Study of clinical, laboratory, and radiological predictors for predicting the difficulty level of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v9n3.15775

Authors

  • Lauve Bhatt Department of General Surgery, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, India
  • Aum Vavadia Department of General Surgery, Narendra Modi Medical College, India

Keywords:

Laboratory, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Radiological

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold-standard treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease. While often a routine procedure, its difficulty can vary, with some cases presenting significant technical challenges. A difficult LC is associated with increased operative time, higher rates of conversion to open surgery, and a greater risk of complications such as bile duct injury. Therefore, accurately predicting the difficulty level before surgery is crucial for patient counseling, surgical planning, and improving outcomes. This article explores the key clinical, laboratory, and radiological factors used to predict the difficulty of LC. Preoperative assessment of the patient’s clinical history, laboratory results, and radiological findings is essential for predicting the difficulty of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. By identifying high-risk patients, surgeons can optimize surgical planning, ensure the availability of experienced staff and appropriate resources, and provide more realistic counseling to the patient. Several studies have developed scoring systems that integrate these factors to provide a more objective prediction of surgical difficulty, thereby enhancing patient safety and improving the overall quality of care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Karmacharya, G., & Karki, S. (2017). Predictive factors for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a study from a tertiary care center. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 15(36), 148-152.

Kasi, M., M., & Kasi, S. P. (2015). A study to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(7), 1672-1676.

Livingston, E. H., & Rege, R. V. (2004). A nationwide study of the incidence of cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery, 188(1), 107-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.013

Nachnani, G., & Kumar, R. (2018). Preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on clinical, laboratory, and sonographic parameters. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 21(3), 118–122.

Sood, P., & Kapoor, R. (2017). Predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of two scoring systems. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(2), PC01-PC04.

Tayeb, M., & El-Lakany, H. (2019). Pre-operative scoring system for predicting difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 38(3), 565-570.

Jain, K. K. (2005). Nanotechnology in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Clinica chimica acta, 358(1-2), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2005.03.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccn.2005.03.014

Puggioni, A., & Wong, L. L. (2003). A metaanalysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 197(6), 921-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.011

Randhawa, M. S., & Singh, K. (2013). Pre-operative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian Journal of Surgery, 75(4), 282–286.

Saba, L., Biswas, M., Kuppili, V., Godia, E. C., Suri, H. S., Edla, D. R., ... & Suri, J. S. (2019). The present and future of deep learning in radiology. European journal of radiology, 114, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.038

Published

10-09-2025

How to Cite

Bhatt, L., & Vavadia, A. (2025). Study of clinical, laboratory, and radiological predictors for predicting the difficulty level of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. International Journal of Health Sciences, 9(3), 883–886. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v9n3.15775

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles