The  use of synchronous and asynchronous teaching methods in pedagogical education in COVID-19 terms

Valentyna Lytvyn; Olena Akimova; Halyna Kuznetsova; Tetiana Zenchenko; Olena Stepanenko; Inna Koreneva

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2681

Authors

Valentyna Lytvyn
mrs.valentynka@gmail.com
Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kharkiv Regional Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Olena Akimova Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kharkiv Regional Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine
Halyna Kuznetsova Oleksandr Dovzhenko Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University, Hlukhiv, Ukraine
Tetiana Zenchenko Oleksandr Dovzhenko Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University, Hlukhiv, Ukraine
Olena Stepanenko Communal institution of higher education Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council, Dnipro, Ukraine
Inna Koreneva Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy of Kharkiv Regional Council, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Keywords:

COVID-19 Terms, educational activities, educational information, educational policies, educational process, higher educational institution, learning conditions, mentoring

Abstract

The purpose of the academic paper lies in determining the ratio of synchronous and asynchronous teaching methods in modern pedagogy on the example of the analysis of the activity of higher education institutions within the conditions of quarantine restrictions. The sociological survey was conducted in two stages. Stage I – July – September 2021 (stage of information collection: opinion poll). The second stage is October 2021 (analytical). The advantages of synchronous teaching and learning have been determined, namely: easy interaction; real-time mode; questioning, instant answers, motivation, and help, immediate feedback from the teacher, group classes, high concentration. The disadvantages of synchronous teaching and learning have been identified, namely: physical compliance with the schedule, poor implementation of individualization, appropriate training, poor content of the digital learning platform, poor organization of various communication channels, and low level of digital alternative. The list of benefits of asynchronous learning has been revealed as follows: flexibility, antilocalization, economy, time mobility, one’s own working pace, the schedule convenience, point definition of the purposes. It has been found that the drawbacks of asynchronous learning are as follows: a decrease in an academic discipline, a decrease in socialization, feedback difficulty, limited contact, isolation, the need for self-discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Attamimi, H. R. ., Lestari, Y. ., Situmorang, B. . H. L. ., Antari, G. Y. ., & Nugrawati, N. . (2020). Application of habituation method in germas interventionsin: the pandemic time COVID-19 . International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 3(1), 98-104.

Bakhtiyorovna, K. N. (2021). Interactive teaching methods: Critical thinking. Academicia: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(1), 1163-1167.

Besser, A., Lotem, S., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2020). Psychological stress and vocal symptoms among university professors in Israel: implications of the shift to online synchronous teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.05.028

Bueno, D. C. (2020). G-SPACE’s guidance on asynchronous teaching and learning via Google Classroom. April), 0–24.

Callejas, A., Lupiánez, J., & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: On their independence and interactions. Brain and cognition, 54(3), 225-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.012

Charidimou, D., Politis, D., & Aleksi?, V. (2020). Multilingual Conversational Communication Tools for Distance Learning.

Etchells, M. J., Brannen, L., Donop, J., Bielefeldt, J., Singer, E. A., Moorhead, E., & Walderon, T. (2020). Synchronous Teaching: Asynchronous Trauma.

Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

Khalil, R., Mansour, A. E., Fadda, W. A., Almisnid, K., Aldamegh, M., Al-Nafeesah, A., ... & Al-Wutayd, O. (2020). The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives. BMC medical education, 20(1), 1-10.

Kistan, K., Malka, S., & Musni, M. (2020). The relationship between knowledge, attitude, and readiness of academic community in Covid-19 spread prevention: Batari Toja Nursing Academy, Watampone. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 3(1), 72-78.

Kusumajaya, A. A. N. (2021). Individual and social environmental factor as risk factor of BMI-for-age in school children. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijhs.v5n2.1242

Lawrence, V. A., Hazuda, H. P., Cornell, J. E., Pederson, T., Bradshaw, P. T., Mulrow, C. D., & Page, C. P. (2004). Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 199(5), 762-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.280

Lee, S. Y., & Winandy, J. (2021). Scientization of professional teacher knowledges and construction of teaching methods. Paedagogica Historica, 1-18.

Mak, A. S., Westwood, M. J., Ishiyama, F. I., & Barker, M. C. (1999). Optimising conditions for learning sociocultural competencies for success. International journal of intercultural Relations, 23(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00026-1

McCann, V. (2021). Synchronous and asynchronous teaching innovations for online introductory geoscience lab courses during covid-19. Joint 55th Annual North-Central / 55th Annual South-Central Section Meeting . 18, 3-5.

Pech, M., Rehor, P., & Slabová, M. (2021). Students Preferences in Teaching Methods of Entrepreneurship Education. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 14(2), 66-78.

Qu, P. (2018). Multimedia Teaching Platform Construction for Fashion Design Based on Simulation and Synchronous Teaching System. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(5).

Ramísio, P. J., Pinto, L. M. C., Gouveia, N., Costa, H., & Arezes, D. (2019). Sustainability Strategy in Higher Education Institutions: Lessons learned from a nine-year case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.257

Roga, R., Lapi?a, I., & Müürsepp, P. (2015). Internationalization of higher education: Analysis of factors influencing foreign students’ choice of higher education institution. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 925-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.506

Schiff, M., Zasiekina, L., Pat-Horenczyk, R., & Benbenishty, R. (2021). COVID-related functional difficulties and concerns among university students during COVID-19 pandemic: A binational perspective. Journal of community health, 46(4), 667-675.

Seifert, T. (2019). Improving involvement through interaction in synchronous teaching/learning in higher education. In Educational Technology and Resources for Synchronous Learning in Higher Education (pp. 229-254). IGI Global.

Shieh, C. J., & Qiang-Jun, Q. I. (2020). An Integration of Internet IPR Synchronous Teaching on Learning Outcomes. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 69, 194.

Sundli, L. (2007). Mentoring—A new mantra for education?. Teaching and teacher education, 23(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.016

Swaran Singh, C., et al. (2021). Using Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Methods during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia: Preservice and In-Service Teachers’ Perspectives, 5, 18-21.

Szeto, E. (2014). A comparison of online/face-to-face students’ and instructor's experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4250-4254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.926

Sztekler, K., & Jod?owski, G. S. (2017). Case Teaching Method-New Teaching Method At Technical Universities. In Conference: 10th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, DOI (Vol. 10).

Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003

Tiburcio, J. M. (2021). Leveraging Technology in Asynchronous and Synchronous Teaching. Leveraging Technology in Asynchronous and Synchronous Teaching, 80(1), 16-16.

Underhill, C. M. (2006). The effectiveness of mentoring programs in corporate settings: A meta-analytical review of the literature. Journal of vocational behavior, 68(2), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.05.003

Velázquez, M. del R. H., Báez, A. A. L., Pérez, A. M., & Luna, A. A. (2021). Educational innovation in the comprehensive training of nursing graduates. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijhs.v5n1.700

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Yang, Y. (2019, October). Application of asynchronous teaching method in College Basketball Course. In 4th International Conference on Modern Management, Education Technology and Social Science (MMETSS 2019) (pp. 348-351). Atlantis Press.

Zounek, J., Zaleska, K., & Juhanak, L. (2020). Teaching with the use of ICT in an international perspective: on the way to modern pedagogy. Lifelong Learning - Lifelong Learning.