Management of HEIs during pandemic

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.3311

Authors

  • Lyubov Kanishevska Institute of Problems on Education of the NAES of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Valentyna Shakhrai Institute of Problems on Education of the NAES of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Svitlana Aleikseieiva Institute of Pedagogy, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Oksana Poyasyk Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • Svitlana Tolochko National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Keywords:

blended learning, distance learning, health camps, health courses, higher education, medical services, mental health

Abstract

This article aims to assess the changes in the HEIs management system elements during the pandemic. The methodology was built on the analysis of management cases of Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko and National University "Lviv Polytechnic". The internal documentation of HEIs management: strategies and development plans, internal documentation of quality management system implementation defining the main challenges of HEIs management were also used for case analysis. Results. It was determined that the pandemic generated significant structural changes in the system of HEIs management caused by changes in students' needs, development, and spread of innovative learning technologies, reduction in the number of international students, closing, merging, and restructuring of universities due to funding cuts. The pandemic has put forward challenges to the core business of higher education in supporting students through a wide range of curricula. These challenges make it much more difficult to implement interactive, person-centered traditional classroom instruction based on years of university experience. To adapt to a long-term pandemic, HEIs require flexible educational methods that will continuously adapt to different stages. COVID-19 led to the activation of long-term pedagogical trends, created a natural experiment to test and evaluate numerous innovations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher education studies, 10(3), 16-25.

Antonopoulou, H., Halkiopoulos, C., Barlou, O., & Beligiannis, G. N. (2021). Transformational leadership and digital skills in higher education institutes: during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging science journal, 5(1), 1-15.

Arora, A. K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the teaching–learning process: A study of higher education teachers. Prabandhan: Indian journal of management, 13(4), 43-56.

Arshad, M., Almufarreh, A., Noaman, K. M., & Saeed, M. N. (2020). Academic Semester Activities by Learning Management System during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case of Jazan University. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 11(5), 213-219.

Attamimi, H. R. ., Lestari, Y. ., Situmorang, B. . H. L. ., Antari, G. Y. ., & Nugrawati, N. (2020). Application of habituation method in germas interventionsin: the pandemic time COVID-19 . International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 3(1), 98-104.

Bao, W. (2020). COVID?19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115.

Blankenberger, B., & Williams, A. M. (2020). COVID and the impact on higher education: The essential role of integrity and accountability. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(3), 404-423.

Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021). COVID-19 and higher education: first-year students’ expectations toward distance learning. Sustainability, 13(4), 1889.

Diachenko, A., Vusyk, H., Bielova, Y., Shurdenko, M., & Titenko, O. (2021). The educational role in COVID-19 terms of ethnodesign graphic function in higher education practical activities. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), 584-593. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2540

García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 196.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Gjellebæk, C., Svensson, A., Bjørkquist, C., Fladeby, N., & Grundén, K. (2020). Management challenges for future digitalization of healthcare services. Futures, 124, 102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102636

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The internet and higher education, 18, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003

Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bézivin, J., & Kurtev, I. (2008). ATL: A model transformation tool. Science of computer programming, 72(1-2), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2007.08.002

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 93, 612-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248

Lytvyn, V., Akimova, O., Kuznetsova, H., Zenchenko, T., Stepanenko, O., & Koreneva, I. (2021). The use of synchronous and asynchronous teaching methods in pedagogical education in COVID-19 terms. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), 617-629. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2681

Manatos, M. J., Sarrico, C. S., & Rosa, M. J. (2017). The integration of quality management in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(1-2), 159-175.

Markova, T., Glazkova, I., & Zaborova, E. (2017). Quality issues of online distance learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.043

Meissner, A., Müller, M., Hermann, A., & Metternich, J. (2018). Digitalization as a catalyst for lean production: A learning factory approach for digital shop floor management. Procedia manufacturing, 23, 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.165

Melo, A. I., Sarrico, C. S., & Radnor, Z. (2010). The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities: the case of an English university. Public Management Review, 12(2), 233-254.

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and higher education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Mufidah, N., Suhron, M., & Wahyudi, R. (2021). Analysis of post-stroke anxiety (PSA) factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1807

Paudel, P. (2021). Online education: Benefits, challenges and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher education. International Journal on Studies in Education, 3(2), 70-85.

Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M., Hernández-Díaz, A. G., López-Sánchez, A. D., & Pérez-León, V. E. (2021). Measuring Online Teaching Service Quality in Higher Education in the COVID-19 Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2403.

Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality & quantity, 55(3), 805-826.

Stensaker, B., Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2011). An in?depth study on the impact of external quality assurance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 465-478.

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).

Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational research review, 6(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003

van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). Multidimensional ranking: a new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 1-26.

Wahab, A., & Tyasari, I. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership for university leaders: A futuristic approach for Pakistani HEIs. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.09.002

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Published

30-01-2022

How to Cite

Kanishevska, L., Shakhrai, V., Aleikseieiva, S., Poyasyk, O., & Tolochko, S. (2022). Management of HEIs during pandemic. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.3311

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles