An intricate estimation of bone levels after immediate dental implant therapy with bone graft at various time periods
An in vivo study
Keywords:
autogenous bone grafts, bone loss, computed tomography, cone beam, immediate implantAbstract
Aim: This in vivo study was conducted to estimate bone levels after immediate dental implant therapy with autogenous bone graft at various time periods. Materials & Methods: Total 10 male and 6 female patients in the range of 27-47 years were included in the study. Patients those reported for immediate rehabilitation of existing single posterior teeth were included. After immediate implant placement with graft, alveolar bone loss was checked by cone beam computed tomography. All participating patients were recalled in post operative phases to see bone losses at all studied sites at all four surfaces mesial, distal, buccal and lingual. Results were entered in table and subjected to basic statistical analysis. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant (p< 0.05). Statistical Analysis and Results: All statistical analysis was completed by using statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. In the age range of 27-29 years, there was one male and one female patient. P value was highly significant for that (0.01). For bone losses seen in two month post operative phase, maximum mean bone loss was there on buccal and distal surfaces. p value was highly significant for mean loss noticed at distal (0.01) and buccal surface (0.02).
Downloads
References
Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A. Effect of laser-microtexturing on bone and soft tissue attachments to dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(4):290-6.
Mustapha AD, Salame Z, Chrcanovic BR. Smoking and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;58(1):39-43.
Sultana R, Raj A, Barbi W, Afridi SK, Mishra BP, Malik R. A Comparative Study Evaluating Implant Success and Bone Loss in Diabetes and Nondiabetes. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 2):S1410-S3.
Park H, Moon IS, Chung C, Shin SJ, Huh JK, Yun JH, Lee DW. Comparison of peri-implant marginal bone level changes between tapered and straight implant designs: 5-year follow-up results. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021;51(6):422-32.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: Immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantology 2010;3:189-205.
Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70.
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
Adell R. Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:251-4.
Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(Suppl.):26-28.
Schulte W, Heimke G. The Tubinger immediate implant (in German). Quintessenz 1976;27:17-23.
Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-343.
Denissen HW, Kalk W, Veldhuis HA, van Waas MA. Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:191-6.
Watzek G, Haider R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Haas R. Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: A retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:561-7.
Tabassum A, Kazmi F, Wismeijer D, Siddiqui IA, Tahmaseb A. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on Radiographic Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants Placed Using Two Different Drilling Protocols: 12-Month Follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(6):e175-e182.
Yang R, Zhang SJ, Song S, Liu XD, Zhao GQ, Zheng J, Zhao WS, Song YL. [Influence of guided bone regeneration on marginal bone loss of implants in the mandible posterior region: a 10-year retrospective cohort study]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021;56(12):1211-6.
Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:820-8.
Covani U, Bortolaia C, Barone A, Sbordone L. Buccolingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. J Periodontol 2004;75:1605-12.
Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-652.
Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl.):186-217.
Cosyn J, Hooghe N, De Bruyn H. A systematic review on the frequency of advanced recession following single immediate implant treatment. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:582-9.
Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73-80.
Atieh MA, Shahmiri RA. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: A finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:123-32.
Suarez F, Chan HL, Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Effect of the timing of restoration on implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review. J Periodontol 2013;84:159-69.
Kim YK, Ahn KJ, Yun PY, et al. Effect of loading time on marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatitecoated implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;39:161-7.
Stafford GL. Different loading times for dental implants - No clinically important differences? Evid Based Dent 2013;14:109-10.
Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:424-32.
Beretta M, Maiorana C, Manfredini M, Signorino F, Poli PP, Vinci R. Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20(3):381-8.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.