An intricate estimation of bone levels after immediate dental implant therapy with bone graft at various time periods

An in vivo study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.4897

Authors

  • Shrimant Raman Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Rama University, Kanpur (UP), India
  • Sumit Aggarwal Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Subharti Dental College & Hospital, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut (UP), India
  • Neha Srivastava Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Rama University, Kanpur (UP), India
  • Himanshu Tiwari Senior Lecturer, Department Of Prosthodontics, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Rama University, Kanpur (UP), India
  • Nazia Qadeer Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Maharana Pratap Dental College, Kanpur (UP), India
  • Nikita Mali Consultant Prosthodontist, Clove Dental, New Delhi, India

Keywords:

autogenous bone grafts, bone loss, computed tomography, cone beam, immediate implant

Abstract

Aim: This in vivo study was conducted to estimate bone levels after immediate dental implant therapy with autogenous bone graft at various time periods. Materials & Methods: Total 10 male and 6 female patients in the range of 27-47 years were included in the study. Patients those reported for immediate rehabilitation of existing single posterior teeth were included. After immediate implant placement with graft, alveolar bone loss was checked by cone beam computed tomography. All participating patients were recalled in post operative phases to see bone losses at all studied sites at all four surfaces mesial, distal, buccal and lingual. Results were entered in table and subjected to basic statistical analysis. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant (p< 0.05). Statistical Analysis and Results: All statistical analysis was completed by using statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. In the age range of 27-29 years, there was one male and one female patient. P value was highly significant for that (0.01). For bone losses seen in two month post operative phase, maximum mean bone loss was there on buccal and distal surfaces. p value was highly significant for mean loss noticed at distal (0.01) and buccal surface (0.02).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A. Effect of laser-microtexturing on bone and soft tissue attachments to dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(4):290-6.

Mustapha AD, Salame Z, Chrcanovic BR. Smoking and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;58(1):39-43.

Sultana R, Raj A, Barbi W, Afridi SK, Mishra BP, Malik R. A Comparative Study Evaluating Implant Success and Bone Loss in Diabetes and Nondiabetes. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 2):S1410-S3.

Park H, Moon IS, Chung C, Shin SJ, Huh JK, Yun JH, Lee DW. Comparison of peri-implant marginal bone level changes between tapered and straight implant designs: 5-year follow-up results. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021;51(6):422-32.

Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: Immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantology 2010;3:189-205.

Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70.

Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.

Adell R. Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:251-4.

Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(Suppl.):26-28.

Schulte W, Heimke G. The Tubinger immediate implant (in German). Quintessenz 1976;27:17-23.

Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-343.

Denissen HW, Kalk W, Veldhuis HA, van Waas MA. Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:191-6.

Watzek G, Haider R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Haas R. Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: A retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:561-7.

Tabassum A, Kazmi F, Wismeijer D, Siddiqui IA, Tahmaseb A. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on Radiographic Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants Placed Using Two Different Drilling Protocols: 12-Month Follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36(6):e175-e182.

Yang R, Zhang SJ, Song S, Liu XD, Zhao GQ, Zheng J, Zhao WS, Song YL. [Influence of guided bone regeneration on marginal bone loss of implants in the mandible posterior region: a 10-year retrospective cohort study]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021;56(12):1211-6.

Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:820-8.

Covani U, Bortolaia C, Barone A, Sbordone L. Buccolingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. J Periodontol 2004;75:1605-12.

Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-652.

Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl.):186-217.

Cosyn J, Hooghe N, De Bruyn H. A systematic review on the frequency of advanced recession following single immediate implant treatment. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:582-9.

Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73-80.

Atieh MA, Shahmiri RA. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: A finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:123-32.

Suarez F, Chan HL, Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Effect of the timing of restoration on implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review. J Periodontol 2013;84:159-69.

Kim YK, Ahn KJ, Yun PY, et al. Effect of loading time on marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatitecoated implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;39:161-7.

Stafford GL. Different loading times for dental implants - No clinically important differences? Evid Based Dent 2013;14:109-10.

Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:424-32.

Beretta M, Maiorana C, Manfredini M, Signorino F, Poli PP, Vinci R. Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20(3):381-8.

Published

20-03-2022

How to Cite

Raman, S., Aggarwal, S., Srivastava, N., Tiwari, H., Qadeer, N., & Mali, N. (2022). An intricate estimation of bone levels after immediate dental implant therapy with bone graft at various time periods: An in vivo study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 1370–1377. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.4897

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)