Efficacy of nano-hydroxyapatite coating on osseointegration of early loaded dental implants

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.4998

Authors

  • Osama Alabed Mela Mansoura University, Faculty of Dentistry, M.Sc
  • Mohamed Abdel-Monem Tawfik Mansoura University, Faculty of Dentistry, Professor and chairman of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Wael Mohamed Ahmed Said Ahmed Mansoura University, Faculty of Dentistry, Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Fakhreldin Hassan Abdel-Rahman Mansoura University, Faculty of Dentistry, Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Keywords:

dental implant surface, nanotechnology-hydroxyapatite, osseointegration, radiographically

Abstract

Background and Objectives:  The success rates of dental implants have been reported as a challenge, especially for early loading in the posterior maxilla area. The surfaces of dental implants are generally modified in an attempt to improve osseointegration. In which Unitite implants with Nano hydroxyapatite coating affect the healing process acceleration, high hydrophilicity, increased bone formation (BIC - Bone Implant Contact ), and the quality improvement of the new bone formed (BAFO - Bone Area Fraction Occupancy), keeping the original implant microtopography. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Nano hydroxyapatite coating osseointegration of early loaded dental implants in the posterior maxilla. Patients and Methods: A clinical trial was carried out on ten patients need  twelve  implants with early loading   were treated in the oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University ;  A root-form implant is the most frequently used type of dental implant today. The basis for dental implants is osseointegration, the HAnano® coating associated with its microtopography generate an increase in the titanium surface energy, making the implant highly hydrophilic, which guarantees the presence of blood and its components in the healing chamber.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Branemark PI, A.R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Ex-perimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstruct Surge 1969; 3: 81 -100.

Christenson EM, A.K. Nano-biomaterial applications in orthopedics. Van den Beucken LJ J Orthop Res 2007; 25: 11–22.

Branemark PI, Albrektsson T. Microcirculation and healing of artificial implants in bone. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress for Microcirculation 1979; 2: 59-60.

Nubesh KT, Swaminathan SK, Viswanathan K, RajasekarS.Osseointegration and more. A review of literature Indian Journal of Dentistry 2012; 3:72-26.

Guehennec Le, Soueidan LA, Layrolle P, AmouriqY.Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 844-854.

Pak HS, Yeo IS, Yang JH. A histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010; 2(4):142–147.

Wennerberg A, Jimbo R, Stubinger S, Obrecht M, Dard M, Berner S. Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25:1041-50.

Anselme K, BM. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. ActaBiomater 2005; 1: 211-222.

John E, Davies B. Understanding Peri-Implant Endosseous Healing. Journal of Dental Education 2003; 67: 932-949.

Kilpadi DV, Lemons JE. Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28: 1419-1425.

Le Guéhennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dental Materials. 2007; 23(7):844–854.

Puleo D, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999; 20:2311-2321.

Klinger MM, Rahemtulla F, Prince CW, Lucas LC, Lemons JE. Proteoglycans at the bone-implantinterface. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998; 9:449-463.

Jimbo R, Coelho PG, Bryington M, Baldassrri I, Albrektsson T. Nano hydroxyapatite coated implants improve bone nanomechanical properties. J Dent Res 2012; 91:1172-1177.

Melin SL, Meirelles L, Franke SV, Kjellin P, Currie F, Andersson M, Wennerberg A. Evaluation of bone healing on sandblasted and acid etched implants coated with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite: an in vivo study in rabbit femur. International Journal of Dentistry 2014; 29:97-104.

Bordin D, Bergamo ETP, Fardin VP, Coelho PG, Bonfante EA .Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extra-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing: In vitro and in silico analysis. MechBehav Biomed Mater 2017; 71:244-249.

Sousa RM, Simamoto-Junior PC, FernandesNeto AJ, Sloten JV, Jaecques SV, Pessoa RS. Influence of connection types and implant number on the biomechanical behavior of mandibular full-arch rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31:750-760.

Pessoa RS, Sousa RM, Pereira LM, Neves FD, Bezerra FJ, Jaecques SV, Sloten JV, Quirynen M, Teughels W, Spin-Neto R. Bone remodeling around implants with external hexagon and morse-taper connections: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth, clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19:97-110.

Bezerra FJ, Ferreira MR, Fontes GN, da Costa Fernandes C Jr; AndiaDC, Cruz NC, da Silva RA; Zambuzzi WF. Nano hydroxyapatite-blasted titanium surface affects pre-osteoblast morphology by modulating critical intracellular pathways. BiotechnolBioeng 2017; 28:868-877.

Michael Bornstein, Christopher N Hart. Early Loading of Nonsubmerged Titanium Implants with a Chemically Modified Sand-Blasted and Acid-Etched Surface: 6-Month Results of a Prospective Case Series Study in the Posterior Mandible Focusing on Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Changes and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) Values.Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2009; 11:338-47.

Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E, Jr., Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbial Immunology 1987; 2:145-151.

Esther M Wilkins. Examination procedures in wilkins EM clinical practice of the dental hygienist. 9thed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott and wilkins 2005; 222-245.

Yoo RH, Chuang SK, Erakat MS, Weed M, Dodson TB. Changes in crestal bone levels for immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2006; 21:253-261.

Editorial. After 40 years: the Mission is Possible. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2005; 20:92-98.

Andersen E, Haanæs HR, Knutsen BM. Immediate Loading of Single-tooth ITI Implants in the Anterior Maxilla: a prospective 5-year pilot study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13:281-287.

Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Ferri V, Viola P, Gelpi F, Esposito M. Immediate loading of single implants inserted flapless with medium or high insertion torque: a 6-month follow-up of a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implanted 2012; 5: 333-342.

Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 572-578.

Schroeder, E. Van der Zypen, Stich H. reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces,” Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery 2011; 22: 135-142.

Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M. “Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review,” Journal of Dental Research 2012; 91: 242-248.

Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U. “Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (II): Etiopathogenesis,” European Journal of Oral Sciences1998; 106: 721-764.

Meirelles L. On Nano Size Structures for Enhanced Early Bone Formation, Department of Prosthodontics/Dental Material Science, Department of Biomaterials, G¨oteborg University, G¨oteborg, Sweden, 2007.

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. “On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions,” The International Journal of Oral andMaxillofacial Implants 2010; 25: 63-74.

Deyneka-Dupriez N, Kocdemir B, Herr U. “Interfacial shear strength of titanium implants in bone is significantly improved by surface topographies with high pit density and microroughness,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials2007; 82: 305-312.

Proussaefs P, Lozada J. Immediate loading of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the maxillary premolar area: Three-year results of a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:228-233.

Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate Functional Loading of Brånemark Single Tooth Implants. An 18 Months‘Clinical Pilot Follow-up Study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000; 11: 26-33.

Mounir GM. Beheiri W. El-Beialy: Assessment of marginal bone loss using full thickness versus partial thickness flaps for alveolar ridge splitting and immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg 2014; 5:021.

Meirelles L, Peltola T, Mellin L, Kjellin P. Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response. Oral Maxillofacial. Surg 2008; 10:245-254.

Jimbo R, Sotres J, Johansson C, Breding K, Currie F, Wennerberg A. “The biological response to three different nanostructures applied on smooth implant surfaces,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 2012; 23:706–712.

Martins LM, Martins LM, Bonfante EA, Zavanelli RA, Freitas AC Jr, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG. Fatigue reliability of three single-unit implant-abutment designs.Implant Dent 2012; 21:67-71.

Suelen CS, Jose CM,Rodrigo R. The Influence of Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite Surface in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: A Multiparameter Animal Study in Low-Density Bon. Int J of Nanomedicine 2020; 15:8803-8817.

Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Zhang K, Wegscheider WA. Inpatient comparison of immediately loaded and nonloaded implants within 6 Months Clin. Oral Impl. Res 2003; 14: 273-279.

Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate Functional Loading of Brånemark Single Tooth Implants. An 18 Months‘Clinical Pilot Follow-up Study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000; 11: 26-33.

Proussaefs P, Lozada J. Immediate loading of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the maxillary premolar area: Three-year results of a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:228-233.

Andersen E, Haanæs HR, Knutsen BM. Immediate Loading of Single-tooth ITI Implants in the Anterior Maxilla: a prospective 5-year pilot study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13:281-287.

Coelho PG, Suzuki M, Guimaraes MV, Marin C, Granato R, Gil JN, et al. Early bone healing around different implant bulk designs and surgical techniques: A study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12(3):202-8.

Leonard G, Coelho P, Polyzois I, Stassen L, Claffey N. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res.2009; 20:232-9.

Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14:251-62.

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:172-84.

Jeffcoat MK. Reddy MS. Advances in measurements of periodontal bone and attachment loss. Monogr Oral Sci 2000; 17: 56 – 72.

Soliman M, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of copolymerized Polylactic/ polyglycolic acids as a bone filler in combination with a cellular dermal matrix graft around immediate implants. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2014; 8(4): 381-92.

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. “On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions,” The International Journal of Oral andMaxillofacial Implants 2010; 25: 63-74.

Reigstad O, Johansson C, Stenport V, Wennerberg A, Reigstad A, Rokkum M. Different patterns of bone fixation with hydroxyapatite and resorbableCaP coatings in the rabbit tibia at 6, 12, and 52 weeks. J Biomed Mater Res B ApplBiomater. 2011; 99:14-20.

Wennstrom JL, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Karlssom S, Lindhe L. implant supported single- tooth resoration- a 5 year prospective study. J clinperiondentol 2005; 32:567-574.

Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin Schaffner T, Marti P& Geering AH. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implant supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5:9-18.

Yoo RH, Chuang SK, Erakat MS, Weed M, Dodson TB. Changes in crestal bone levels for immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2006; 21:253-261.

Payne AG, Tawse-Smith A, Kumara R& Thompson WM. One-year prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark fixtures with mandibular overdentures immediately following surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3: 9-19.

Jimbo R, Coelho PG, Bryington M, Baldassarri M, Tovar N, Currie F, et al. Nano hydroxyapatitecoated implants improve bone nanomechanical properties. J Dent Res 2012; 91(12):1172-7.

Coelho PG, Sudack P, Suzuki M, Kurtz KS, Romanos GE, Silva NR. In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability 53 of different implant systems. Journal of oral rehabilitation 2008; 35(12):917-24.

Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? Journal of periodontology 2002; 73(3):322-33.

Strietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26(3):342-58.

Published

23-03-2022

How to Cite

Mela, O. A., Tawfik, M. A.-M., Ahmed, W. M. A. S., & Abdel-Rahman, F. H. (2022). Efficacy of nano-hydroxyapatite coating on osseointegration of early loaded dental implants. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 696–712. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.4998

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles