Assessment of allograft and bioresorbable xenograft in immediate implant placement

Baburajan Kandasamy; Arshad Jamal Sayed; Sandeep Kalra; Vishwas Kharsan; Jeethu John Jerry; Alisha Thankam Varghese; Piyush Oswal

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5136

Authors

Baburajan Kandasamy Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
Arshad Jamal Sayed Associate Professor & HOS, MDS in Periodontics, Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry inArRass, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Sandeep Kalra Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, MMCDSR, Mullana, Haryana, India
Vishwas Kharsan Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Nair Hospital Dental College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Jeethu John Jerry Professor, Department of Periodontics, Malabar Dental College and Research Centre, Edappal, Malappuram, Kerala, India
Alisha Thankam Varghese Department of conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Venkateswar Dental College and Hospital, Bannerghatta, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Piyush Oswal
piyush_oswal@yahoo.co.in
Associate Professor, Dr. DY Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. DY PatilVidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Allograft, Plaque index, gingival index, Xenograft

Abstract

Background: Use of grafts helps in healing and successful outcome of immediate dental implants. Materials & Methods: The study comprised a total of twenty four individuals in the age groupbetween 20 and 56 years with at least one tooth indicated for extraction. The twenty four subjects were divided into two groups; Group Aallograft with implant and Group B-xenograft with implant. The participantswere evaluated both clinically (plaque, probing depth) and radiographically for 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The level ofsignificance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Xenograft in immediate implant site showed excellent osseointegration around the immediate implant site. However, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both synthetic allograft and bioresorbable xenograft are promising and equally potential in bone formation around the immediate implant site.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Daniel D, Shetty V, Jose J, Kumar A H, Santosh B S, Saikrrupa S P. The efficacy of synthetic allograft and bioresorbablexenograft in immediate implant procedures: A comparative clinical study. J Dent Implant 2020;10:93-8

Sheikh Z,SimaC, GlogauerM. Bone Replacement Materials and Techniques Used for Achieving Vertical Alveolar Bone Augmentation. Materials.2015;8:2953-2993

Adell R, Ericsson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. A long term follow up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347-359.

Brugnami F, Caiazzo A. Efficacy evaluation of a new buccal bone plate preservation technique: A pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:67-73.

Serrano Méndez CA, Lang NP, Caneva M, Lemus GR, Solano GM, Botticelli D. Comparison of allografts and xenografts used for alveolar ridge preservation. A clinical and histomorphometric RCT in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Aug;19(4):608-615.

Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. Immediate implant placement: a procedure without incisions. J Periodontol. 1998;69(7):743-750.

Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol. 2001;72(11):1560-1571.

Shirmohammadi A, Roshanagar L, Chitsazi MT, Pourabbas R, Faramarzie M, Rashmanpour N. Comparative study on the efficacy of anorganic bovine bone (bio oss) and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (ostim) in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. IntSch Res Notice 2014;1:1-7.

Stacchi C, Lombardi T,Oreglia F, AlberghiniMaltoni A,Traini T. Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. BioMed Research International. 2017;Article ID 9489825, 10 pages

Blaggana V, Gill AS, Blaggana A. A clinical and radiological evaluation of the relative efficacy of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft versus anorganic bovine bone xenograft in the treatment of human infrabony periodontal defects: A 6 months follow-up study. J Indian SocPeriodontol 2014;18:601-7.

Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(2):189-199.