Effect of consumer prior knowledge on attitude, behavioural intention and adoption of artificial intelligence enabled products
A study among generation Y and Z
Keywords:
consumer, knowledge, behavioural intention, productsAbstract
Rapid growth in artificial Intelligence technology has propelled the rise of AI enabled intelligent products. The study analysing the impact of consumer prior knowledge on the attitude, behavioural intention and thus leading to the adoption and acceptance of AI enabled products is evaluated. The study is grounded on the basis of Technological Acceptance Model. The data is collected from a sample of 376 respondents belonging to various generation. The Structural Equation Modelling is used to validate the conceptual Model .Findings of the study indicates that, it is the usefulness of the technology , attributes of the product and accuracy in completing the task leads to the purchase of AI enabled products among Generation Y and Z.
Downloads
References
Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A., 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Q 16 (2), 227–247.
Alba, Joseph W. and J. Wesley Hutchinson (1987), "Dimensions of Expertise," Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 411-54. -and-(2000), "Knowledge Calibration," Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (September), 123-56.
Alvermann, D. E., Smith, L. C., and Readence, J. E. (1985). Prior knowledge activation and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Read. Res. Q. 20, 420–436. doi: 10.2307/747852.
Barrenechea,F.(2012), Targeting generation Z.
Bencsik,Andrea, Horvath-Csikos Gabriella,Juhasz Timea,(2016), “Y and Z Generations at Workplace”, Journal of Competitiveness,Vol.8,Issue.3,pp.90-106,
Bettman, James R. and C. Whan Park (1980), "Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis”., Journal of Consumer Research,7(December),234-48
Brucks, Merrie(1985), “ The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June 1985): 1–16
Chuah, S.H.W., Rauschnabel, P.A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., Lade, S., 2016. Wearable technologies: the role of usefulness and visibility in smart watch adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 65, 276–284.
Cohen, J., & Areni, C. (1991). Affect and consumer behavior. In T. S. Robertson & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behaviour (pp. 188–240).Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
D.H. Bassiouni and C. Hackley, “‘Generation z’ children adaptation to digital consumer culture: A critical Literature Review, Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13 (2) (2014), pp. 113-133
Davis, F.D., 1985. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13 (3), 319–339.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35 (8), 982–1003.
Dochy, F. (1992). Assessment of Prior Knowledge as a Determinant for Future Learning. The Use of Prior Knowledge State Tests and Knowledge Profiles. Utrecht: Lemma B.V.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., and Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: the case of research on prior knowledge. Rev. Educ. Res. 69, 145–186. doi: 10.3102/00346543069002145.
Ernst, & Young. (2015). What if the next big disruptor isn't a what but a who? Ernst &Young LLP. Ernst & Young.
Falk, J. H., and Adelman, L. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40, 163–176. doi: 10.1002/tea.10070.
Fishman A Ann (1998): Generational Marketing: Reaching the Hearts and Minds of Consumers, Circulation Management, Jul 1,1998.
Fornell, Claes, and Larcker, David F.: Evaluating Structural Equation Journal of Consumer Psychology 4 (1995): 153–180
Frank, R.F., Chong, D.D., 2002. Generation Y: purchasing power and implications for marketing. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal. Retrieved on June,2010, from http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi 0198-413705/Generation-Ypurchasing-power-and.html
González García, C., Meana Llorián, D., Pelayo García-Bustelo, B.C., Cueva Lovelle, J.M., 2017. A review about smart objects, sensors, and actuators. Int. J. Interact Multimedia Artif Intell.
Grail Research – a division of Integreon (2011): Consumers of Tomorrow: Insights and Observations About Generation
Hansen, Flemming (1972), Consumer Choice Behavior, NewYork: Free Press.
Higgins, E. Tory (2000), "Making a Good Decision: Value from fit”., American Psychologist,55(November).,1217-30
Hong Jiewen, Sternthal Brian(2010), “The Effects of Consumer Prior Knowledge and Processing Strategies on Judgments”., Journal of Marketing Research , April 2010, Vol. 47, No. 2 (April 2010), pp. 301-311., Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. on behalf of American Marketing Association.,Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25674428
Howard, John A. (1977), Consumer Behavior: Applicationof Theory, New York: McGraw Hill. , and Sheth, Jagdish N. (1969), The Theory of BuyerBehavior, New York: John Wiley & Sons,. Inc.
http://www.diariodeunbuzo.com/2012/07/targeting-generation-z.htmBagozzi R. P(2007), The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift, Journal of the Association for Information system,8(4),244-254Business on main:http://businessonmain.msn.com/browseresources/articles/selling.aspx?cp-documentid=26113914#fbid=BNsi4kb9vLC
Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., 1999. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Inf. Manage. 35 (4), 237–250.
Kim, H.W., Chan, H.C., Gupta, S., 2007. Value-based adoption of mobile Internet: An empirical investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 43 (1), 111–126.
Kim, K.J., Shin, D.H., 2015. An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Res. 25 (4), 527–541.
Kim, Y., Park, Y., Choi, J., 2017. A study on the adoption of IoT smart home service: Using value-based adoption model. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. 28 (9–10),1149–1165.
Kulviwat Songpol, Bruner II C Gordon, Kumar Anand, Nasco A Suzanne, Clark Terry(2007)“Towards a Unified Theory of Consumer Acceptance Technology”., Vol. 24(12): 1059–1084, Psychology & Marketing,Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/mar.20196.
Lewandowsky, Stephan and Kim Kirsner (2000), "Knowledge Partitioning: Context-Dependent Use of Expertise”., Memory and Cognition, 28(march),295-305.
Li Liang-yi(2019), “Effect of Prior Knowledge on Attitudes, Behavior, and Learning Performance in Video Lecture Viewing”., International Journal of Human computer Interaction.,Vol.35., https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543086
Muderrisoglu, Aydin (1979), "The Stability of Responses Obtained by Free Elicitation: Implications for Measuring Attribute Salience and Memory Structure," in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 6, ed. William L. Wilkie, Miami: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 269-75
Ooi, K.B., Tan, G.W.H., 2016. Mobile technology acceptance model: An investigation using mobile users to explore smartphone credit card. Expert Syst. Appl. 59,33–46.Olson, Jerry C. (1978), "Theories of Information Encoding and Storage: Implications for Consumer Research, “In the Effect of Information on Consumer and Market Behaviour, ed. Andrew A. Mitchell, Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 49-60.
Palmer, D., 2008. Cracking the Gen Y culinary code. Australian Food News.Retrieved on November 10, 2008, from
Priporas Constantinos-Vasilios, Stylos Nikolaos, K. Fotiadis c Anestis (2017), “Generation Z consumers' expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda”., computers in Human Behaviour,
Punj, G. and Brookes, R. (2001), “Decision constraints and consideration-set formation inconsumer durables”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 18, p. 843.
R. Bernstein(2015), “More over Millenials, here comes generation Z.Ad.age., http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/move-millennials-gen-z/296577/
Raju, P. S., Lonial, S. C., and Mangold, W. G.: Subjective, Objective, Society 17 and Experience-based Knowledge: A Comparison in the Decision making Context. Developments in Marketing Science 16 (1993): 60
Raju, P. S., Lonial, Subhash C., and Mangold, W. Glynn: Differential Effects of Subjective Knowledge, Objective Knowledge, and Usage Experience on Decision Making: An Exploratory Investigation Journal of Consumer Psychology
S. Fister-Gale(2015), “Forget millennials: Are you ready for Generation Z?”
S. Lee(2009), “Mobile internet services from consumers' perspectives”, `International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25 (5) (2009), pp. 390-413.
Schepman Astrid. Rodway Paul(2020), “Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale”., Journalof Computers in Human Behaviour.,
Schlossberg, M. (2016). Teen Generation Z is being called 'millennials on steroids,' and that could be terrifying for retailers. Retrieved 9, 2016, from Business Insider UKhttp://uk.businessinsider.com/millennials-vs-gen-z-2016-2.
Schwarz, Norbert (2004), "Meta-Cognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making”., Journal Of Consumer Psychology ., 14(3),332-48.
Sohn Kwonsang, Kwon Ohbyung(2020), “Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products”., Journal of Telematics and Informatics.,
Sterne, J. Artificial Intelligence for Marketing Practical Application, 1st ed.; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing, China, 2019; pp. 9–15
Subramanian, G.H., 1994. A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decis. Sci. 25 (5–6), 863–874.
Sujan, Mita (1985), "Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments”, Journal of Consumer Research, 12(June), 31-46
Tari, A. (2010). Y generáció. Budapest: Jaffa Kiadó.
Tari, A. (2011). Z generáció. Budapest: Tericum Kiadó Kft.
Tseng, K.C., Hsu, C.L., Chuang, Y.H., 2013. Designing an intelligent health monitoring system and exploring user acceptance for the elderly. J. Med. Syst. 37 (6), 9967.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9967-y.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46 (2), 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Manage. Sci. 27 (3), 425–478.
Wang, C.H., 2016. A novel approach to conduct the importance-satisfaction analysis for acquiring typical user groups in business-intelligence systems. Comput. Hum.Behav. 54, 673–681.
Wang, Y.Y., Luse, A., Townsend, A.M., Mennecke, B.E., 2015. Understanding the moderating roles of types of recommender systems and products on customer behavioural intention to use recommender systems. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 13 (4), 769–799
Wood S(2013), “Generation Z as consumers: Trends and Innovation: Institute for Emerging Issues:NC State University.
Yang, H., Lee, H., Zo, H., 2017. User acceptance of smart home services: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 117 (1), 68–89.
Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., Choi, M., 2016. User acceptance of wearable devices: an extended perspective of perceived value. Telemat. Inform. 33 (2), 256–269.
Yang, K., Jolly, L.D., 2009. The effects of consumer perceived value and subjective norm on mobile data service adoption between American and Korean consumers. J.Retail. Consumer Serv. 16 (6), 502–508.
Zemke R., Raines c, and Filipczak,B.(200), “Generations at work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers and Nexters at your Woorkplace”, American Management Association, Washington DC
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
