Affinity and complexity of biophilia in Cormac McCarthy’s Suttree

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.5261

Authors

  • A. Joshua Sundar Raja Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of English, Bishop Heber College, Tiruchirappalli, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India
  • K. Kaviarasu Assistant Professor, Department of English, Vivekananda College, Agastheeswaram, Kanniyakumari, Affiliated to Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, India

Keywords:

Biophilia, Cormac McCarthy, Suttree, Biophilia Affinity, Biophilia Complexity, Nature, Eco-System, Philia, Phobia

Abstract

Every writer has some intention to reflect themselves in their writings which may be conscious or sometimes it may be happening in the unconscious state of mind. Even the critics and scholars have tried to decode the Author’s writing, seeking the image of the writer. Though decoding the other’s personal life is not a good sense of morality, it has some interesting factors like the feel of detective in detective fiction. Sometimes the decoder failed to decode the author’s image in their writings. Here in this research article, the researcher is not going to decode the author’s personal life but it is mentioned the protagonist of the novel Suttree by Cormac McCarthy has three love affairs that are completely relevant to Cormac McCarthy’s Personal Life because Cormac McCarthy has three wives. Even in Cormac McCarthy’s official website, mentioned that in Suttree, “He is referring to himself” (Todd).   Therefore, it is clearly understood, this particular novel is not like other novels of Cormac McCarthy, instead, it is a semi-autobiographical novel. So, decoding this novel and proving this is semi-autobiographical is not necessary, since it already proved one.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Ecological Devastation.” THE SOULS OF POOR FOLK:, Institute for Policy Studies, 5 Feb. 2017, doi:10.2307/resrep27071.7.

Beavers, Jay Aaron. “‘Stairwell to Nowhere’: The Darkness of God in Cormac McCarthy’s Suttree.” South Atlantic Review, vol. 80, no. 1–2, South Atlantic Modern Language Association, Dec. 2015, pp. 96–114, https://www.jstor.org/stable/soutatlarevi.80.1-2.96.

Chang, Chia chen, et al. “Social Media, Nature, and Life Satisfaction: Global Evidence of the Biophilia Hypothesis.” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60902-w.

Gugler, Josef. African Film Re-Imagining a Continent. Oxford James Currey, 2003.

HAGE, ERIK. Cormac McCarthy A Literary Companion. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2010.

Hand, Kathryn L., et al. “The Importance of Urban Gardens in Supporting Children’s Biophilia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 2, 2017, doi:10.1073/pnas.1609588114.

Kellert, Stephen R., and Edward O. Wilson, editors. “The Biophilia Hypothesis.” Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, Island Press.

McCarthy, Cormac. Suttree. Penguin Random House, 1979.

Peacock, Kent. “The Symbiotic Vision.” Alternatives Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, Alternatives Inc, Feb. 2007, pp. 35–36, http://www.jstor.org/stable/45033310.

Peebles, Stacey. “Suttree’s Soundscapes.” The Cormac McCarthy Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, Penn State University Press, 2003, pp. 168–82, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42909733.

Ramakrishna, Wusirika, et al. “Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in Agriculture: Two Sides of a Coin.” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 138, 2019, pp. 10–18, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.019.

Rothfork, John. “Redemption as Language in Cormac McCarthy’s ‘Suttree.’” Christianity and Literature, vol. 53, no. 3, Sage Publications, Ltd., Dec. 2004, pp. 385–97, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44313328.

Todd, Raymond. “Suttree.” The Cormac McCarthy Society, 1996, p. 1, https://www.cormacmccarthy.com/works/suttree/.

Published

30-03-2022

How to Cite

Raja, A. J. S., & Kaviarasu, K. (2022). Affinity and complexity of biophilia in Cormac McCarthy’s Suttree. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.5261

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles