Assessing the impact on course outcomes using different types of assessment components with varying teaching approaches

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5286

Authors

  • C.M. Vivek Department of Mechanical Engineering, Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science and Technology, Vallam, India
  • P.K. Srividhya Department of Mechanical Engineering, Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science and Technology, Vallam, India
  • G. Thamilvannan Department of Education, Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science and Technology, Vallam, India
  • P. Ram Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankoil, India

Keywords:

Course Outcome, Programme Outcome, Flipped Classroom

Abstract

The concept of measuring the course outcome (CO) is emphasized by the introduction of outcome-based education (OBE). The CO attainment measured depends on various factors such as student’s background, diversity, influence of family members, teaching approaches and evaluation approaches etc.  The attainment of CO directly influences he Programme Outcomes (PO) attainment. In three different approaches is taken, i.e., conventional and flipped classroom approach and blended learning approach with components by conventional written assessment activity-based assessment and case study assessment. The impact of the assessment components was measured in final written exam. The results indicates that the activity-based assessment given in conventional and flipped classroom approach has better CO attainment % in terms of conventional written assessment in teaching approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators, 1801 North Moore Street, Arlington, VA 22209 (Stock No. 21-00488; $18.95 plus postage)

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.

Johnson, G. B. (2013). Student perceptions of the flipped classroom (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).

Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 47(1), 109-114.

Rea-Dickins, P. (2007). Classroom-based assessment: Possibilities and pitfalls. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 505-520). Springer, Boston, MA.

Alonzo, D., Mirriahi, N., & Davison, C. (2019). The standards for academics’ standards-based assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(4), 636-652

Vivek, C. M., Thamilvanan, G., & Mohanasundaram, K. (2019). Influence of activity based assessment in outcome-based education. Test engineering and management, 81, 4524–4528

Sadler*, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 30(2), 175-194

Vivek, C. M., & Ramkumar, P. (2021). Evaluation of course outcome attainment of engineering course with traditional, blended and flipped classroom approaches. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2225-2231.

Published

01-04-2022

How to Cite

Vivek, C., Srividhya, P., Thamilvannan, G., & Kumar, P. R. (2022). Assessing the impact on course outcomes using different types of assessment components with varying teaching approaches. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 2879–2887. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5286

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles