Stereolithography in implant placement

A review

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.5344

Authors

  • Manmeet Singh Gulati Professor And Head Of Department, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, India
  • Manmohit Singh Kumar Professor Dept.of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge Desh Bhagat Dental College And Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, India
  • Jasleen Arora Sr.Lecturer, Dept.of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge Desh Bhagat Dental College And Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, India

Keywords:

stereolithography, photopolymerization reaction, implant placement, 3D objects

Abstract

Stereolithography (SLA), the first form of additive manufacturing, creates 3D objects by selectively solidifying liquid resin via a photopolymerization reaction. Stereolithography has gained popularity due to its ability to fabricate objects with high accuracy and in a wide range of materials. SLA has undergone four generations of major technological innovation since its invention in the 1980s. As a result of these advancements, a diverse range of stereolithography systems with dramatically improved resolution, throughput, and material selection for creating complex 3D objects and devices is now available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• McGivney GP, Haughton V, Strandt JA, et al: A comparisonof computer-assisted tomography and data gathering modalities in prosthodontics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:55-68

• Fjellstrom CA, Strom C: CT of the edentulous maxilla intended for osseo-integrated implants. J CraniomaxillofacSurg 1987;15:45-46

• Andersson L, Kurol M: CT scan prior to installation of osseointegrated implants in the maxilla. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg 1987;16:50-55.

• Petrikowski CG, Pharoah MJ, Schmitt A: Presurgical radiographic assessment for implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:59-64

• Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Chafetz N, et al: Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33:555-597.

• Sethi A: Precise site location for implants using CT scans: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:433-438

• Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, et al: Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol 1993;64:1243-1249

• Gillespie JE, Isherwood I: Three-dimensional anatomical images from computed tomographic scans. Br J Radiol1986;59:289-292

• B. C. Gross, J. L. Erkal, S. Y. Lockwood, C. Chen, and M. D. Spence, “Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 3240–3253, 2014.

• Azari A, Nikzad S. The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyping J 2009; 15: 216-225.

• G. Oberoi, S. Nitsch, M. Edelmayer, K. Janjić, A. S. Müller, and H. Agis, “3D printing-encompassing the facets of dentistry,” Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, vol. 6, article 172, 2018

• Prechtel, M. Reymus, D. Edelhoff, R. Hickel, and B. Stawarczyk, “Comparison of various 3D printed and milled PAEK materials: effect of printing direction and artificial aging on Martens parameters,” Dental Materials, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 197–209, 2020.

• Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 571-577.

• Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spüntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: Optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:709–16.

Published

31-12-2021

How to Cite

Gulati, M. S., Kumar, M. S., & Arora, J. (2021). Stereolithography in implant placement: A review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S2), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS2.5344

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles