Monoblocks in root canals

A review

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.5381

Authors

  • Akshita Mahajan Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh
  • Nimrita Preet Kaur Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh
  • Khushboo Ayoub PG student (2nd year), Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Desh Bhagat Dental College & Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh

Keywords:

monoblocks, MTA, fibre posts, bonding root canal

Abstract

The term “monoblock” has become a familiar term in the endodontic literature with recent interest in the application of dentin adhesive technology to endodontics. Endodontic “monoblocks” have generated controversial discussions among academicians and clinicians as to whether they are able to improve the quality of seal in root fillings and to strengthen roots. The ultimate challenge for successful endodontic therapy is to establish a homogenous unit of the root canals which requires a hermetic seal. Adhesion of root canal sealers to dentin is important to seal the root canal system thoroughly and to prevent microleakage. Bonding of root filling materials to the radicular dentin is known as ‘monoblocks’ which has become more popular after introduction of bonding concept in the root canal system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: A hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod. 2007;33(4):391–98.

Franklin R Tay , David Pashley.Monoblocks in Root Canals : A Hypothetical or a Tangible Goal. Jour Of Endond 2007; 33(4): 391-99 .

Benkel BH, Rising DW, Goldman LB, Rosen H, Goldman M, Kronman JH. Use of a hydrophilic plastic as a root canal filling material. J Endod 1976;2:196–202. [PubMed: 820827]

Chirila TV, Chen YC, Griffin BJ, et al. Hydrophilic sponges based on 2 hydroxyethyl methacrylate, I: effect of monomer mixture composition on the pore size. Polym Int 1993;32:221–32.

Andreasen JO, Munksgaard EC, Bakland LK. Comparison of fracture resistance in root canals of immature sheep teeth after filling with calcium.

Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 2006;32:553–5. [PubMed: 16728249].

Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Brady K, Sweeney R, Curtis RV, Ford TR. The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Mater 2005;21:297–303. [PubMed: 15766576]

Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. X-ray diffraction analysis of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. Int Endod J 2006;39:220–5. [PubMed: 16507076]

Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Moiseyeva R, Kawashima I. Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2005;31:97–100. [PubMed: 15671817]

Bozeman TB, Lemon RR, Eleazer PD. Elemental analysis of crystal precipitate from gray and white MTA. J Endod 2006;32:425–8. [PubMed: 16631841]. 11.Marending M, Bubenhofer SB, Sener B, De-Deus G. Primary assessment of a self-adhesive gutta-percha material. Int Endod J. 2013;46(4):317–22.

Lee KW, Williams MC, Camps JJ, Pashley DH. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and guttapercha. J Endod 2002;28:684–8. [PubMed: 12398164]

Koch K, Min PS, Stewart GG. Comparison of apical leakage between Ketac Endo sealer and Grossmansealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:784–7. [PubMed: 7898911]

Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Herd D, Stephens E. The use of glass ionomer as a root canal sealer -a pilot study. Int Endod J 1992;25:238–44. [PubMed: 1291520].

Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 2006;32:553–5. [PubMed: 16728249].

Li LL, Wang ZY, Bai ZC, Mao Y, Gao B, Xin HT, Zhou B, Zhang Y, Liu B. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006;119:305–11. [PubMed: 16537026].

Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Inage H, Kurokawa H. Determination of elastic modulus of the components at dentin-resin interface using the ultrasonic device. Dent Mater J 2004;23:361–7. [PubMed:15510866.

Lertchirakarn V, Timyam A, Messer HH. Effects of root canal sealers on vertical root fractureresistance of endodontically treated

Shipper G, Ørstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 2004;30:342–7. [PubMed: 15107647]

Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson JY, Trope M. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:646–52. [PubMed: 15202759]

Shipper G, Teixeira FB, Arnold RR, Trope M. Periapical inflammation after coronal microbial inoculation of dog roots filled with gutta-percha or Resilon. J Endod 2005;31:91–6. [PubMed:15671816]

Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson J, Leinfelder KF, Trope M. Dentinal bonding reaches the root canal system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:348–54. [PubMed: 15801340].

Teixeira FB. Ideal obturation using synthetic root-filling systems: coronal sealing and fracture resistance. Prac Proced Aesthet Dent 2006;18:S7–S11.

Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Pashley DH, Mak YF, Lai CN, Raina R, Williams MC. Ultrastructural evaluation of the apical seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2005;31:514–9. [PubMed: 15980711]

Bodrumlu E, Tunga U. Coronal sealing ability of a new root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73(7):623.

Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Monticelli F, Weller RN, Breschi L, Ferrari M, et al. Effectiveness of resin-coated gutta-percha cones and a dual-cured, hydrophilic methacrylate resin-based sealer in obturating root canals. J Endod. 2005;31(9):659–64.

Jensen, SD.; Fischer, DJ. United States Patent & Trademark Office. Method for filling and sealing a root canal. Patent Number 6,811,400, November 2, 2004.

Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing anendodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:243–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M and Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Research. 2005;84:118-32

Koch, K.; Brave, D. Integral gutta percha core/cone obturation technique. United States Patent 7,021,936, 2006

Monticelli F, Sword J, Martin RL, Schuster GS, Weller RN, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Sealing properties of two contemporary single-cone obturation systems. Int Endod J. in press.

Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN and Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod. 2005;31:584-89

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H and Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Research. 2000;79:1385-91.

Mjör IA, Smith MR, Ferrari M and Mannocci F. The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth. Int Endod J. 2001;34:346-53.

Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN and Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod. 2005;31:584-89.

Tagami J, Tao L and Pashley DH. Correlation among dentin depth, permeability, and bond strength of adhesive resins. Dental Materials. 1990;6:45-50.

Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC and Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Ame J dent. 2000;13:255-60.

Kanca J III. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent. 1996;9:273-76.

Yiu CK, Pashley EL, Hiraishi N, King NM, Goracci C, Ferrari M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, TayFR. Solvent and water retention in dental adhesive blends after evaporation. Biomaterials.2005;26:6863–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Yiu CK, Pashley EL, Hiraishi N, King NM, Goracci C, Ferrari M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, TayFR. Solvent and water retention in dental adhesive blends after evaporation. Biomaterials.2005;26:6863–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Hiraishi N, Breschi L, Prati C, Ferrari M, Tagami J, King NM. Technique sensitivity associatedwith air-drying of HEMA-free, single-bottle, one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2006 in press.[PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-salinization Dent Mater. 2005;21(5):437–44.

Wrbas KT, Schirrmeister JF, Altenburger MJ, Agrafioti A, Hellwig E. Bond strength between fibre posts and composite resin cores: effect of post surface silanization. Int Endod J. 2007;40(7):538–43

Published

31-07-2021

How to Cite

Mahajan, A., Kaur, N. P., & Ayoub, K. (2021). Monoblocks in root canals: A review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(S1), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5nS1.5381

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles