Mystery revealed on efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone on post-operative sequelae after 3rd molar surgery

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5490

Authors

  • Adil M Mevawala Post Graduate Trainee, Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College And Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043
  • Shandilya Ramanojam Associate Professor, Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College And Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043
  • Rajshekhar Halli Professor, Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College And Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043
  • Rajesh Kshirsagar Professor And Head Of Department, Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College And Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043
  • Saurabh Khandelwal Assistant Professor, Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College And Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043
  • Vikrant Sane Professor, Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College And Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, 411043

Keywords:

Mandibular 3rd molar surgery, 8mg Dexamethasone, 40mg methylprednisolone, Intravenous route

Abstract

Background: Owing to its potent mode of action and lengthy half-life, dexamethasone has been used in oral surgery for many years. Several dexamethasone delivery methods for third molar surgery have been proposed. Dexamethasone administration has been a source of debate, with studies being unable to agree on the best effective method for reducing post-extraction complications. Aim:  To carry out comparative evaluation of effect of intravenous 8 mg Dexamethasone and 40 mg Methylprednisolone on pain, swelling and trismus post-operatively after mandibular impacted 3rd molar surgery. Methods and Materials: The study used a split mouth technique, in which the impacted mandibular 3rd molars were extracted one at a time, separated by at least 21 days. Following surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar, the patient was given 8mg Dexamethasone intravenously at the first appointment. The surgical removal of the mandibular third molar on the contralateral side was performed on the same patient at the second session after 21 days, and 40 mg Methylprednisolone was administered intravenously post-operatively. Results: For the 2nd, 5th, and 7th day postoperative evaluations, patients showed decreased swelling with the Dexamethasone protocol compared to the Methylprednisolone protocol. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moraschini V, Hidalgo R, Porto Barboza Ed. Effect of submucosal injection of dexamethasone after third molar surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg2016;45:232-40.

Shepherd JP, Brickley M. Surgical removal of third molars. BMJ 1994;309:620-1.

Bamgbose BO, Akinwande JA, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Arotiba GT, Ogunlewe MO. Effects of co-administered dexametha- sone and diclofenac potassium on pain, swel-ling and trismus following third molar surgery. Head Face Med 2005;7:11.

Laureano Filho JR, Maurette PE, Allais M, Cotinho M, Fernandes C. Clinical comparative study of the effectiveness of two dosages of dexamethasone to control postoperative swelling, trismus and pain after the surgical extraction of mandibular impacted third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E129-32.

Chaudhary PD, Rastogi S, Gupta P, Niranjanaprasad Indra B, Thomas R, Choudhury R. Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone injection and consumption on post-operative swelling, pain, and trismus after third molar surgery. A prospective, double blind and randomized study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2015;5:21-7..

Alexander RE, Throndson RR. A review of perioperative corticosteroid use in dentoal-veolar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:406–15.

Baxendale BR, Vater M, Lavery KM. Dex-amethasone reduces pain and swelling fol-lowing extraction of third molar teeth. Anaesthesia 1993;48:961–4.

Vegas-Bustamante E, Mico´-Llorens J, Gar-gallo-Albiol J, Satorres-Nieto M, Berini- Ayte´s L, Gay-Escoda C. Efficacy of methyl-prednisolone injected into the masseter mus-cle following the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:260–3.

Beirne OR, Hollander B. The effect of methylprednisolone on pain, trismus, and swelling after removal of third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;61:134–8.

Laureano Filho JR, Maurette PE, Allais M, Cotinho M, Fernandes C. Clinical compara-tive study of the effectiveness of two dosages of dexamethasone to control postoperative swelling, trismus and pain after the surgical extraction of mandibular impacted third molars. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E129–32.

U¨stu¨n Y, Erdogan O, Esen E, Karsli ED. Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:535–9.

Alcântara CE, Falci SG, Oliveira-Ferreira F, Santos CR, Pinheiro ML. Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone on pain, swelling,and trismus after third molar surgery: A split-mouth randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg2014;43:93-8.

Published

04-04-2022

How to Cite

Mevawala, A. M., Ramanojam, S., Halli, R., Kshirsagar, R., Khandelwal, S., & Sane, V. (2022). Mystery revealed on efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone on post-operative sequelae after 3rd molar surgery. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 3352–3362. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5490

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)