Clinical and radiological assessment of adjacent segment degenerative changes in cervical spine after instrumentation in indian scenerio

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5743

Authors

  • Swapnil S Patil Consultant Neurosurgeon Institute of Neuroscience, Medanta Gurgoan, Haryana, India
  • Ajaydeep Singh Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Maharashi Mahakandeshwar Institute of Medical Science and Research, Mullana, Haryana India
  • Arvinpreet Kour Assistant Professor Department of Anaesthesia, Maharashi Mahakandeshwar Institute of Medical Science and Research, Mullana, Haryana, India

Keywords:

Cervical spine fusion, spondylotic myelopathy, adjacent segment changes, fusion surgeries

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Over the last 50 years many authors have used cervical spine fusion as a treatment for degenerative spondylotic conditions, and it has become the standard of care for numerous pathologic conditions of the spine. However, since over the past two decades spinal fusion has been performed on younger patients and the rates of cervical spine surgery have increased. Here we have studied the incidence of the adjacent segment disease and the radiological changes of cervical cord at the level of previous operation and at the adjacent segment. METHODS: Non randomised, open level study done at territory care centre for a period of three years a total 51 operated cervical spine patients were studied. MRI of cervical spine was done in symptomatic patients. All the patients were followed up clinically and radiologically. RESULTS:  Fifty one patients were followed up for minimum of 2 years (average 72.82 months) after cervical spine instrumentation. 23 patients had single or multiple co- morbidities. 29 (56.86%) patients developed adjacent segment degeneration following the primary surgery. Rate of re- surgery for the symptomatic ASD was 9.8% , Development of radiological or clinical ASD 54.9%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hilibrand A S et al, radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis, J bone joint surg Am, 1999 Apr; 81 (4): 519- 28

David A Levin et al, Adjacent segment degeneration following spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease, Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for joint diseases: 2007; 65(1); 29-36

Sabri Cem et al, assessment of adjacent segment degeneration in and between patients treated with anterior or posterior cervical simple discoidectomy, Turkish Neurosurgery 2010, vol:20, No:3, 334- 340

Xiao-Peng Xia et al, Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery, SPINE, Vol 38, Number 7, 597-608

Goffin et al, Long term follow up after inter body fusion of cervical spine, Journal of spine disorders and techniques,Apr-2004,vol-17,issue-2

Baohui Yang et al, The incidence of adjacent segment degeration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials, PLoS ONE, Apr 2012, Vol 7, Issue 4,

R D Donk, R H Bartels et al: Adjacent Disc Degeneration In The Cervical Spine: Personal Data And A Critical Reappraisal Of Literature. The Internet Journal Of Spine Surgery2012, Vol-6, Issue-2.

Gonugunta et al, anterior cervical plating, Neurology India/Dec 2005/Vol 53/Issue 4/424-432Yasutaka Matsuda et al, Increased MR signal intensity due to cervical myelopathy, Analysis of 29 surgical cases, Journal of neurosurgery, June 1991, Vol-74, No-6.

Gonugunta et al, anterior cervical plating, Neurology India/Dec 2005/Vol 53/Issue 4/424-432Yasutaka Matsuda et al, Increased MR signal intensity due to cervical myelopathy, Analysis of 29 surgical cases, Journal of neurosurgery, June 1991, Vol-74, No-6.

Hiroshi Nakamura et al, Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion, The Spine Journal, 4 (2004) 624- 628

Hiroshi Nakamura et al, Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion, The Spine Journal, 4 (2004) 624- 628

Chunhou An et al,Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery,2008,vol-22,Issue-4,pages-390-393

Pierce D Nunley et al, Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re- examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria, The Spine Journal 13 (2013), 5- 12

Jaewan Soh et al, Analysis of risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration occurring more than 5 years after fusion with pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spine, Asian Spine J 2013; 7 (4): 273-281

Yasutaka Matsuda et al, Increased MR signal intensity due to cervical myelopathy, analysis of 29 surgical cases, Journal of neurosurgery, Jun 1991, Vol- 74, No-6.

Eck J C,Drew J,Effect of magnetic resonance imaging signal changes in myelopathic patients: a meta analysis, Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2010 nov 1;35 (23) E1306-9.

T Alafifi et al, Clinical and MRI predictors of out come after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, Journal of neuroimaging, Oct-2007, Vol-17, Issue-4.

Avadhani A et al ,Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classification of signal intensity changes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy,Spine J,2010;10 (6),475-485

ZHANG peng, SHEN yong et al, Prognosis value of the ratio of signal intensity on MRI in cervical sopndylotic myelopathy, Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, 2011, vol 31, issue 8:825-828

Rui Gao, Lili Yang, Huajiang Chen et al,Long term result of anterior Corpectomy and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, PLoS ONE, 7(4):e34811:10.1371/journal. Pone 00348

Published

09-04-2022

How to Cite

Patil, S. S., Singh, A. ., & Kour, A. (2022). Clinical and radiological assessment of adjacent segment degenerative changes in cervical spine after instrumentation in indian scenerio. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 4035–4048. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.5743

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)