A comparative study to evaluate use of apache ii and sofa score in sepsis patients in intensive care unit of a tertiary level hospital in western Maharashtra
Keywords:
Sepsis, Intensive care, APACHE II score, SOFA score, ComparisonAbstract
Background: Intensive care units (ICU) in most settings consume very high cost and sophisticated devices but mortality rates are still very high. There is no specific literature comparing APACHE II score and SOFA score in sepsis patient and this research topic will help to identify the score more appropriate to predict the seriousness, outcome and mortality of patients suffering from sepsis, which has been evaluated in our study. Methodology: This was a single centre hospital based cross sectional, observational, descriptive study conducted in patients in ICUs of our institute. 100 patients over age 16 years old admitted in intensive care unit who have fulfilled the criteria for sepsis were included in our study. Their clinical profile, APACHE II and SOFA scores were evaluated and compared with respect to patients’ outcome in the form of survival. Results: The mean age was 56.71 ± 16.77 years. Majority of patients were males (69%). 52 of patients were survivors (52%) and non-survivor were 48%. The mean SOFA score of survived patients was 3.54 ± 2.57 lower than non-survivor patients of 6.02 ± 3.17.
Downloads
References
Lewandowski K, Lewandowski M. Scoring systems in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesist. 2003;52(10): 965-987.
Le Gall JR. The use of severity scores in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31: 1618-1623.
Ridley S. Severity of illness scoring systems and performance appraisal. Anaesthesia. 1998;53: 1185-1194.
Rothen HU, Takala J. Can outcome prediction data change patient outcomes and organizational outcomes? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14: 513-519.
Woodhouse D, Berg M, van der Putten J, Houtepen J. Will benchmarking ICUs improve outcome? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15: 450-455.
Kramer AA, Zimmerman JE. Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited. Crit Care Med. 2007;35: 2052-2056.
Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, et al. Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a systematic review. JAMA 2009;301:2362-75.
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008;36:296-327.
Halim DA, Murni TW, Redjeki IS. Comparison of Apache II, SOFA, and modified SOFA scores in predicting mortality of surgical patients in intensive care unit at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital. Crit Care Shock. 2009;12(4):157-69.
Anjana D. A Comparative Study of APACHE II and SOFA Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis. International Journal of Health Research and Medico Legal Practice. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):20-2.
Türe M, Memiş D, Kurt IM, Pamukçu Z. Predictive value of thyroid hormones on the first day in adult respiratory distress syndrome patients admitted to ICU: comparison with SOFA and APACHE II scores. Annals of Saudi medicine. 2005 Nov;25(6):466-72.
Kim YH, Yeo JH, Kang MJ, Lee JH, Cho KW, Hwang S, Hong CK, Lee YH, Kim YW. Performance assessment of the SOFA, APACHE II scoring system, and SAPS II in intensive care unit organophosphate poisoned patients. Journal of Korean medical science. 2013 Dec 1;28(12):1822-6.
Zhang XM, Zhang WW, Yu XZ, Dou QL, Cheng AS. Comparing the performance of SOFA, TPA combined with SOFA and APACHE-II for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill surgical patients: A secondary analysis. Clinical Nutrition. 2020 Sep 1;39(9):2902-9.
Hantke M, Holzer K, Thöne S, Schmandra T, Hanisch E. The SOFA score in evaluating septic illnesses. Correlations with the MOD and APACHE II score. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen. 2000 Oct 1;71(10):1270-6.
Tsaousi GG, Pitsis AA, Ioannidis GD, Pourzitaki CK, Yannacou-Peftoulidou MN, Vasilakos DG. Implementation of EuroSCORE II as an adjunct to APACHE II model and SOFA score, for refining the prognostic accuracy in cardiac surgical patients. The Journal of cardiovascular surgery. 2014 Feb 13;56(6):919-27.
Sushil Kumar, Lew CC, Wong GJ, Tan CK, Miller M. Performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) in the prediction of hospital mortality in a mixed ICU in Singapore. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare. 2019 Sep;28(3):147-52.
Abhinandan, K.S. and Vedavathi, R., 2013. Usefulness of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score in analysing patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in sepsis. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2(49), pp.9591-9606.
Jain A, Palta S, Saroa R, Palta A, Sama S, Gombar S. Sequential organ failure assessment scoring and prediction of patient's outcome in Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):364-8.
Safari S, Shojaee M, Rahmati F, Barartloo A, Hahshemi B, Forouzanfar MM, Mohammadi E. Accuracy of SOFA score in prediction of 30-day outcome of critically ill patients. Turkish journal of emergency medicine. 2016 Dec 1;16(4):146-50.
Naqvi IH, Mahmood K, Ziaullaha S, Kashif SM, Sharif A. Better Prognostic Marker in ICU-Apache Ii, Sofa or Sap Ii!. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2016 Sep;32(5):1146.
Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25(7):686-696.
Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent JL. How changes in SOFA score can predict outcome. Critical Care Medicine. 1999 Dec 1;27(12):A50.
Vosylius S, Sipylaite J, IvaskeviciusJ. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score as the Determinant of Outcome for Patient with Severe Sepsis. Croat Med J. 2004 Dec; 45(6):715-20.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.