Permanent commission to female officers of armed forces in India

Negating all biological stereotypes & towards transformative constitutionalism 2.0

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.5752

Authors

  • Sherry Pant Assistant Professor, Law College Dehradun, Uttaranchal University
  • Sachin Bhardwaj Assistant Professor, Law College Dehradun, Uttaranchal University

Keywords:

armed forces, transformative constitutionalism, gender equality, judicial review, permanent commission, equal opportunity

Abstract

In the past decade, the State via its three organs has unarguably shown an immense enthusiasm for social change, and the most revered of all the media to achieve the same has been ‘judicial review’. In 2020, President Ram Nath Kovind at the International Judicial Conference themed ‘Judiciary and the Changing World’ also applauded the proactive pivotal role of the Supreme court in bringing progressive and dramatic social transformation through radical reforms. One of such instances was where the Apex court exercising its power of judicial review gave a boost to this social revolution, invoked the idea of transformative constitutionalism and tarmacked the road for female officers to permanent commission in the Armed Forces whilst promoting the idea of gender equality and removing gender bias. This article analyses the transformative character of the Indian constitution in the light of the judgements of the Supreme Court in “The Sectt. Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya (2020)” and, “Union of India v. Ltd. Cdr. Annie Nagaraja (2020)” which endorsed the ‘principle of non-discrimination’ on ground of sex thereby eradicating the gender stereotyes which associate women with ‘weaker sex’.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Joseph Shine v. UOI, (2018) 4 MLJ (Crl) 369 (SC)

Baxi Upendra, (2001) “Saint Granville's Gospel: Reflections” Economic and Political Weekly Vol. 36, No. 11, pp 921.

Austin Granville (1999): The Indian Constitution : Cornerstone of a nation: Oxford University Press

Baxi Upendra, (1999-2000) “Constitutionalism as a Site of State Formative Practices” Cardozo Law Review Vol. 21, pp 1183.

Hermeneutics : the branch of knowledge that deals with theory and methodology of interpretation of texts

Bhatia Gautam (2019): The Transformative Constitution: A Radical Biography in Nine Acts: Harper Collins Publishers

Joseph Shine v. UOI, (2018) 4 MLJ (Crl) 369 (SC)

Presently, for a total of fourteen years, (i.e. ten years extendable by four more years)

Rule 203, The Naval Ceremonial, Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Regulations, 1963

section 12, Air Force Act, 1950 No. 45 Acts of Parliament, 1950

section 12, Army Act, 1950 No. 46 Acts of Parliament, 1950

section 9(2), Navy Act, 1957 No. 62 Acts of Parliament, 1957

The Sectt. Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, Civil Appeal No. 9367-9369/2011, d/d 17.02.2020

OA No. 143 of 2016

Union of India v. Ltd. Cdr. Annie Nagaraja, SLP (C) No. 30791-96/2015, d/d 17.03.2020

The Sectt. Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, Civil Appeal No. 9367-9369/2011, d/d 17.02.2020

OA No. 143 of 2016

The Sectt. Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, Civil Appeal No. 9367-9369/2011, d/d 17.02.2020

Union of India v. Ltd. Cdr. Annie Nagaraja, SLP (C) No. 30791-96/2015, d/d 17.03.2020

Radha Charan Patnaik v. State Of Orissa, AIR 1969 Ori 237

Mary Roy v. State of Kerala, AIR 1986 SC 1011

C. B. Muthamma v. UOI, AIR 1979 SC 1868

U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)

Joseph Shine v. UOI, (2018) 4 MLJ (Crl) 369 (SC)

R. Viswan v. Union of India (1983) 3 SCC 401

The Sectt. Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, Civil Appeal No. 9367-9369/2011, d/d 17.02.2020

Published

08-04-2022

How to Cite

Pant, S., & Bhardwaj, S. (2022). Permanent commission to female officers of armed forces in India: Negating all biological stereotypes & towards transformative constitutionalism 2.0. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.5752

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles