A randomised prospective comparative study of hemodynamic variables using propofol versus sevoflurane for induction and maintanence of anaesthesia in adult nasal surgeries
Keywords:
Single agent anaesthesia, TIVA, VIMA, FESSAbstract
Introduction: Intravenous agents are commonly used for induction of anaesthesia in adults followed by inhalational agents for maintenance. A problem with this technique is transition phase from induction to maintenance. Rapid redistribution of Intravenous agent could lead to lightening of anaesthesia before adequate depth is attained with inhalational agent. As nasal surgeries like FESS requires a blood less field with minimal hemodynamic variability, present study is undertaken to compare hemodynamic variability and induction time using Propofol versus Sevoflurane for both induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in adult nasal surgeries. Materials and Methods: This Quasi Experimental study was conducted in Department of Anaesthesia, Yenepoya Medical College Hospital, Mangalore during the period between October 2015 and October 2017. 60 patients were randomly divided into one of the two groups by envelope method in which Group P patients (n = 30) was induced with Propofol 2 mg/kg and maintained with Propofol infusion at 100 mcg/kg/min and Group S patients (n = 30) was induced with Sevoflurane 8% and maintained with Sevoflurane 2%. Induction time was noted.
Downloads
References
Bobby A. Tajudeen, David W. Kennedy. Thirty years of endoscopic sinus surgery: What have we learned?. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2017 (3), 115-121.
Sivaci R, Yilmaz MD, Balci C, Erincler T, Unlu H.Comparison of Propofol and Sevoflurane anaesthesia by means of blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery. Saudi Med J. 2004 Dec; 25(12):1995-8.
Sarika S Naik, Sudhir M Naik. Advantages of Propofol, Anaesthesia in Endonasal Endoscopic Surgeries. RGUHS Journal of Medical Sciences, October 2012 ,2 (4) 207-211.
Bharti Neerja, Chari Pramila, Thingnam Shyam K S, Arora Suman, Comparison of Hemodynamic and Cardiovascular Effects of VIMA with Sevoflurane Versus TIVA with Propofol in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , Indian journal of anaesthesia 2008, 52(6): 805-80.
K.R Watson, M.V. Shah, Clinical comparison of ‘single agent’ anaesthesia with Sevoflurane versus target controlled infusion of Propofol , British Journal of Anaesthesia2000, 85, 4, 541-546.
Ahn HJ, Chung SK, Dhong HJ, Kim HY, Ahn JH, Lee SM, Hahm TS, Kim JK. Comparison of surgical conditions during Propofol or Sevoflurane anaesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery, Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):50-4.
Saravanan P Ankichetty, Manickam Ponniah, VT Cherian, Sarah Thomas, Kamal Kumar, L Jeslin, K Jeyasheela, Naveen Malhotra. Comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using Propofol and inhalational anaesthesia using Isoflurane for controlled hypotension in functional endoscopic sinus surgery , Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 2011, 27(3), 328-332.
Thrivikrama Padur Tantry, BG Muralishankar, Karunakara Kenjar Adappa, Sudarshan Bhandary, Pramal Shetty, Sunil P Shenoy. Target-controlled infusion (Propofol) versus inhaled anaesthetic (Sevoflurane) in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery, Indian Journal of Anaesthesiology 2013 ,57 (1)35-40.
Selen Osmanagaoglu, Hulya Ulusoy, Mehmet Salih Colak, Nesrin Erciyes. Comparison of the Effects of Sevoflurane, Desflurane and Totally Intravenous Anaesthesia with Propofol on Hemodynamic Variables Using Transesophageal Doppler, 2008 ,52(5) 527.
A. Thwaites, S. Edmends, I. Smith. Inhalation induction with Sevoflurane: a double-blind comparison with Propofol, British Journal of Anaesthesia ,1997; 78: 356–361.
Thompson S, Drummond GB. Loss of volition and pain response during induction of anaesthesia with Propofol or Sevoflurane, British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2001 August ;87(2):283-6.
Muzi M, Robinson BJ, Ebert TJ, O’Brien TJ. Induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation with Sevoflurane in adults. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 536-543.
O’Brien K, Kumar R, Morton NS. Sevoflurane compared with halothane for tracheal intubation in children. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 452-455.
Sayyid SMS, Aouad MT, Taha SK, Daaboul DG, Deeb PG, Massouh FM, Muallem MRA, Baraka AS. A comparison of Sevoflurane-Propofol versus Sevoflurane or Propofol for laryngeal mask Airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1204-1209.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
