FG comparative study between antigen-antibody complex vaccine and traditional vaccine of infectious bursal disease in commercial broiler

Mohammed Lateef Abdulhadi; Nawal S. Jaafer

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.6398

Authors

Mohammed Lateef Abdulhadi Office of Veterinary, Ministry of Agriculture
Nawal S. Jaafer College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad

Keywords:

complex vaccine, traditional vaccine, infectious bursal disease, commercial broiler

Abstract

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is a viral disease causes increased mortality and severe immunosuppressionin commercial chickens. The virus infects the bursa of Fabricius of particularly the actively dividing and differentiating lymphocytes of the B-cellslineage of young chickens, resultant in morbidity, mortality, and immunosuppression. Immunosuppression enhances the susceptibility of chickens to other infections and interferes with vaccination against other diseases. Immunization is the most important measure to control IBD; however, wild usage of live vaccines has resulted in the evolution of new strains. Although the immunosuppression caused by IBDV is more directed toward the B lymphocytes, the protective immunity in birds depends on inducement of both humeral and cell-mediated immune responses. Currently vaccination mainly used to control IBD. In this study, Group 1(n = 50) received the immune complex vaccine (Bursa-Plex®) s/c at 1 day of age. Group 2 (n = 50) received the GUMBORO (D78)(intervet)vaccine by drinking water and Group 3 (n = 50) were non IBD vaccinated birds. The aim of study: Evaluation between two types of IBD vaccines, immune-complex IBD vaccine (Bursaplex®) with the use of GUMBORO D78(intervet) vaccine. Depending on:At 7,14,21, 28^th day P.V. • Serology (IBD ELISA (INFY)- cellular immunity).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd El-Alim, G. A. and KawKab, A. Ahmed (2006). Efficacy and pathogenicity of three live infectious bursal disease vaccines (intermediate plus strains) in commercial native chickens breed in Egypt. Vet. Med. J., Giza. 54, (3): 649-669.

Bolis, D.A., Paganini, F.J., Simon, V.A., Zuanaze, M.F., Scanavini, Neto H., et al. (2003). Gumboro disease, evaluation of serological and anatomopathological responses in vaccinated broiler chickens challenged with very virulent virus strain. RevistaBrasileira de CięnciaAvícola 5: 137-146.

Briggs, D. J.; Whitfill, C. E.; Skeeles, J. K.; Story, I. and Reed, K. D. (1986). Application of positive negative ratio method of analysis to quantitative antibody response to infectious bursal disease virus using a commercially available ELISA. Avian Dis., 30 (1): 216-218.

Delmas, B., Kibenge, F., Leong, J., Mundt, E., Vakharia, V., et al. (2004). Birnaviridae. In: Fauquet, C.M., Mayo, M.A., Maniloff, J. (ed). Virus Taxonomy Eighth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 561-569.

Dey, S., Pathak, D.C., Ramamurthy, N., Maity, H.K. and Chellappa, M.M. (2019). Infectious bursal disease virus in chickens: prevalence, impact, and management strategies. Volume: 10 Pages 85 - 97.

Ignjatovic, J., Gould, G., Trinidad, L. and Sapats, S. (2006). Chicken recombinant antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus are able to form antibody-virus immune complex. Avian Pathology, 35 (4), 293-301.

Ignjatovic, J., Sapats, S. and Gould, G. (2001). Detection of vvIBDV strains and Australian variants in poultry: A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC Publication No. 01/147, Project No. CSA-2J, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, Australia.

Iva´n, J., Velhner, M., Ursu, K., Germa´n, P., Mato´, T., Dre´n, C.N. and Me´sza´ros, J. (2005). Delayed vaccine virus replication in chickens vaccinated subcutaneously with an immune complex infectious bursal disease vaccine: quantification of vaccine virus by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, 69 (2), 135-142.

Jeurissen, S.H., Janse, E.M., Lehrbach, P.R., Haddad, E.E., Avakian, A. and Whitfill, C.E. (1998). The working mechanism of an immune complex vaccine that protects chickens against infectious bursal disease. Immunology, 95, 494-500.

Marquardt, W. W; Johnson, R. B; Odenwald, W. and Schlottober, B. A. (1980). An indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measuring antibodies in chickens with infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis., 24: 375-385.

Naqi, S. A.; Millar, D. L. and Grumbles, L. C. (1980). An evaluation of 3 commercially available infectious bursal disease vaccines. Avian Dis., 24 (1): 233-240.

Orakpoghenor, O., Oladele, S.B. and Abdu, P.A. (2020). Infectious Bursal Disease: Transmission, Pathogenesis, Pathology and Control - An Overview World's Poultry Science Journal. Volume 76, Issue 2. Pages 292-303.

SAS. (2012). Statistical Analysis System, User's Guide. Statistical. Version 9.1th ed. SAS. Inst. Inc. Cary. N.C. USA.

Solano, W.; Giambrone, J. J.; Williams, J. C.; Lauerman, L. H; Panagala, V. S. and Garces, C. (1986). Effect of maternal antibodies on timing of initial vaccination of young white leghorn chickens against infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis., 30: 648-652.

van den Berg, T.P. and Meulemans, G. (1991). Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry; protection afforded by maternally derived antibodies and interference with live vaccine. Avian Pathol. 20(3): 409-421.

Wagari, A. (2021). A Review on Infectious Bursal Disease in Poultry. Health Econ Outcome Res Open Access, Vol.7, Issue 2: 167(018-023).

Whitfill, C.E., Haddad, E.E., Ricks, C.A., Skeeles, J.K., Newberry, L.A., Beasley, J.N., Andrews, P.D., Thoma, J.A. and Wakenell, P.S. (1995). Determination of optimum formulation of a novel infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) vaccine constructed by mixing bursal disease antibody with IBDV. Avian Diseases, 39, 687- 699.