Limited incision and traditional open carpal tunnel release: Comparison of clinical and neurological outcomes

L Chethan; Gaba Sunil; Parashar Atul; Manish Modi

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6431

Authors

Chethan L
chethan.doctru@gmail.com
Assistant professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, JSS medical college and hospital, mysore, Karnataka - 570015
Gaba Sunil Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Parashar Atul Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Manish Modi Professor, Department of Neurology, PGIMER, Chandigarh

Keywords:

Carpal tunnel syndrome, traditional open approach, limited incision approach, Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire, Vancouver scar scale, Nerve conduction study

Abstract

Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy of the upper extremity. Even though traditional open release has been considered as standard approach for median nerve decompression, various other techniques are gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and neurological outcomes between traditional open approach and limited incision approach. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with isolated CTS have included in this study of which four patients had bilateral CTS thus constituting 32 hands (19-right; 13-left). The patients were divided for treatment into two groups, Group A included 21 hands underwent limited incision release, and Group B included 11 hands released by traditional open incision. Patient's were evaluated preoperatively and in six weeks and six months postoperatively, namely, (a) clinical outcomes including Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire (BCTQ), postoperative scar tenderness, hypertrophic scar, pillar pain & quality of scar by Vancouver scar scale (VSS). (b) sensory testing using two-point discrimination (TPD) (c)motor testing using grip and pinch dynamometer, (d) neurological outcome measurement using nerve conduction study (NCS). Results: In each section of BCTQ outcomes, patients in group A showed significant improvement than in group B at both six weeks and six months follow up.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gelberman HR. Carpal tunnel release. In: Gelberman RH, North ER, editors. Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. 2 vol. Philadelphia (PA): JB Lippincott. 1991;900-11.

Young HA. Surgical management of peripheral entrapment neuropathy. In: Schmidek HH, Sweet WH, editors. Operative neurosurgical techniques. Indications, methods, and results. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders. 1988;1583-98.

Brown RA, Helbernan RH, Seiler JG, et al. Carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75:1265-75.

Sever C, Kulahci Y, Oksuz S, Sachin C. The mini-incision technique for carpal tunnel decompression using nasal instruments. Turkish Neurosurg. 2010;20:353-7.

Lida J, Hirabayashi H, Nakase H, Sakaki T. Carpal tunnel syndrome: electrophysiological grading and surgical results by minimum incision open carpal tunnel release. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008;48:554-9.

Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology. 2002;58:289-94.

Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Gandolfo N, Valle M, Simonetti S, Derchi LE. US of Nerve Entrapments in Osteofibrous Tunnels of the Upper and Lower Limbs. Radiographics. 2000;20:S199-217.

Phalen GS. The carpal tunnel syndrome. Clinical evaluation of 598 hands. Clin Orthop. 1972;83:29-40.

Aydin K, Cokluk C, Piskin A, Kocabicak E. Ultrasonographically checking the sectioning of the transverse carpal ligament during carpal tunnel surgery with limited uni skin incisions. Turkish Neurosurg. 2007;17:219-23.

Shi Q, MacDermid JC. Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome? A systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6:17.

Hui AC, Wong S, Leung CH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of surgery vs steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology. 2005;64:2074-8.

Kuschner SH, Brien WW, Johnson D, Gellman H. Complications associated with carpal tunnel release. Orthop Rev. 1991;20:346–52.

Okada M, Tsubata O, Yasumoto S, Toda N, Matsumoto T. Clinical study of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: Open versus endoscopic technique. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2000;8:19–25.

Lee WP, Strickland JW. Safe carpal tunnel release via a limited palmar incision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:418-24.

Avci S, Sayli U. Carpal tunnel release using a short palmar incision and a new knife. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25:357–60.

Bensimon RH, Murphy RX. Midpalmar approach to the carpal tunnel: An alternative to endoscopic release. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36:462–5.

Agee JM, McCarroll HR, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA. Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17:987–95.

Concannon MJ, Gainor B, Petroski GF, Puckett CL. The predictive value of electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1452–8.

Nath RK, Mackinnon SE, Weeks PM. Ulnar nerve transection as a complication of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a case report. J Hand Surg (Am). 1993;18:896-8.

Del Pinal F, Cruz-Camara A, Jado E. Total ulnar nerve transection during endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:235-7.

Palmer AK, Toivonen DA. Complications of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg (Am). 1999;24:561-5.

Stancic MF, Micovic V, Potoenjak M. The anatomy of the Berrettini branch: implications for carpal tunnel release. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:1027-30.

Bromley GS. Minimal incision open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 1994;19:119–20.

Abouzahr MK, Patsis MC, Chiu DT. Carpal tunnel release using limited direct vision. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:534–8.

Cseuz KA, Thomas JE, Lambert EH, Love JG, Lipscomb PR. Long-term results of operation for carpal tunnel syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 1966;41:232-41.

Kuschner SH, Brien WW, Johnson D, Gellman H. Complications associated with carpal tunnel release. Orthop Rev. 1991;20:346-52.

Ludlow KS, Merla JL, Cox JA, Hurst LN. Pillar pain as a postoperative complication of carpal tunnel release: a review of the literature. J Hand Ther. 1997;10:277-82.

MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Roth JH, et al. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: A randomized trial. J Hand Surg. 2003;28A:475–80.

Zyluk A and Strychar J. A comparison of two limited open techniques for carpal tunnel release. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume). 2006;31B:5:466–472.

Murthy PG, Goljan P, Mendez G, Jacoby SM, Shin EK, Osterman AL. Mini-open versus extended open release for severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2015;10:34-9

Cellocco P, Rossi C, Bizzarri F, Patrizio L, Costanzo G, Aquila L. Mini-Open Blind Procedure Versus Limited Open Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release: A 30-Month Follow-Up Study. J Hand Surg. 2005;30A:493–499.

Tarallo M, Fino P, Sorvillo V, Parisi P, Scuderi N. Comparative analysis between minimal access versus traditional accesses in carpal tunnel syndrome: A perspective randomized study. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2014;67:237.

Gaba S, Bhogesha S, Singh O. Limited incision carpal tunnel release. Indian J Orthop. 2017; 51:192-198.

MacDonald RI, Lichtman DM, Hanlon JJ, Wilson JN. Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3:70–6.

Mackinnon SE, McCabe S, Murray JF, et al. Internal neurolysis fails to improve the results of primary carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 1991;16:211-18.

Hunter JM. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, epineural fibrous fixation, and traction neuropathy. Hand Clin. 1991;7:491-504.

Jones NF, Ahn HC, Eo S. Revision surgery for persistent and recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and for failed carpal tunnel release. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:683-92.