One-year clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns restoring endodontically treated molars with two finish line designs

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.6496

Authors

  • Alaa Samir El-Ashkar Researcher, MS, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
  • Omnia Nabil Ahmed Lecturer at Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
  • Maha Ahmed Taymour Associate Professor at Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt | Assistant Professor at Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, New Giza University, Egypt
  • Adel Mohamed El-Tannir Professor at Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt

Keywords:

Zirconia crowns, feather edge finishline, rounded shoulder finishline, USPHS criteria, endotreated posterior teeth

Abstract

The study's objective was to assess the clinical behavior of monolithic zirconia crowns with two different margin designs in terms of fracture during a one-year period. Forty-four posterior endodontically treated molars received full coverage monolithic crowns. The teeth were separated into two groups depending on the margin design: the control group (RS) had a rounded shoulder finish-line while the intervention group (F) had a feather-edge finish-line. An intra-oral scan was used for the full coverage restorations, which were designed using open source software and machined on a 5 axis machine. The crowns were sandblasted and cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement. The modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to assess clinical behavior in terms of fracture following cementation. The grades were immediately taken after cementation and at three consecutive three-month follow-up assessments over the course of a year. In terms of restoration fractures, all three follow-up examinations yielded a perfect Alpha score of 100 percent for each group. (P<0.05) There was no statistically significant difference between the control (RS) and intervention (F) groups. In this one-year randomized clinical investigation, all of the crowns assessed were clinically successful, with no signs of fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khoroushi, M., Tavakol, F., Mojtahedi, N., Ziaei, S., & Mosleh, H. (2017). Influence of Root Canal Irrigants on Fracture Resistance of Teeth: A Narrative Review. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science, 5(5), 108.‏

Monaco, C., Caldari, M., & Scotti, R. (2013). Clinical evaluation of 1,132 zirconia-based single crowns: a retrospective cohort study from the AIOP clinical research group. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 26(5).‏

Zhang, Y. (2014). Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dental materials, 30(10), 1195-1203.‏

Zhang, Y., & Kelly, J. R. (2017). Dental ceramics for restoration and metal veneering. Dental Clinics, 61(4), 797-819.‏

Beuer, F., Stimmelmayr, M., Gueth, J. F., Edelhoff, D., & Naumann, M. (2012). In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dental materials, 28(4), 449-456.‏

Johansson, C., Kmet, G., Rivera, J., Larsson, C., & Vult von Steyern, P. (2014). Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 72(2), 145-153.‏

Schmitz, J. H., Cortellini, D., Granata, S., & Valenti, M. (2017). Monolithic lithium disilicate complete single crowns with feather-edge preparation design in the posterior region: A multicentric retrospective study up to 12 years. Quintessence International, 48(8).‏

Findakly, M. B., & Jasim, H. H. (2019). Influence of preparation design on fracture resistance of different monolithic zirconia crowns: A comparative study. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 11(6), 324-330.‏

Habib, S. R., Al Ajmi, M. G., Al Dhafyan, M., Jomah, A., Abualsaud, H., & Almashali, M. (2017). Effect of margin designs on the marginal adaptation of zirconia copings. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 51(3), 179-187.‏

Kasem, A. T., Sakrana, A. A., Ellayeh, M., & Özcan, M. (2020). Evaluation of zirconia and zirconia‐reinforced glass ceramic systems fabricated for minimal invasive preparations using a novel standardization method. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 32(6), 560-568.‏

Wiskott, H. A. (2011). Fixed prosthodontics. Principles and Clinics. London: Quintessence.‏

Nabil, O., Halim, C. H., & Mokhtar, A. H. (2021). Fracture resistance and 3D finite element analysis of machined ceramic crowns bonded to endodontically treated molars with two planes versus flat occlusal preparation designs: an in vitro study. F1000Research, 8, 1020.‏

Ferrari Cagidiaco, E., Discepoli, N., Goracci, C., Carboncini, F., Vigolo, P., & Ferrari, M. (2019). Randomized Clinical Trial on Single Zirconia Crowns with Feather-Edge vs Chamfer Finish Lines: Four-Year Results. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 39(6).‏

Sadid-Zadeh, R., Sahraoui, H., Lawson, B., & Cox, R. (2021). Assessment of Tooth Preparations Submitted to Dental Laboratories for Fabrication of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. Dentistry Journal, 9(10), 112.‏

Sidhu, S. K., & Nicholson, J. W. (2016). A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. Journal of functional biomaterials, 7(3), 16.‏

Chirumamilla, G., Goldstein, C. E., & Lawson, N. C. (2016). A 2‐year retrospective clinical study of enamic crowns performed in a private practice setting. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry, 28(4), 231-237.‏

Guilardi, L. F., Pereira, G. K. R., Gündel, A., Rippe, M. P., & Valandro, L. F. (2017). Surface micro-morphology, phase transformation, and mechanical reliability of ground and aged monolithic zirconia ceramic. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 65, 849-856.‏

Kwon, S. J., Lawson, N. C., McLaren, E. E., Nejat, A. H., & Burgess, J. O. (2018). Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 120(1), 132-137.‏

Kolakarnprasert, N., Kaizer, M. R., Kim, D. K., & Zhang, Y. (2019). New multi-layered zirconia: Composition, microstructure and translucency. Dental Materials, 35(5), 797-806.‏

Konstantinidis, I., Trikka, D., Gasparatos, S., & Mitsias, M. E. (2018). Clinical outcomes of monolithic zirconia crowns with CAD/CAM technology. a 1-year follow-up prospective clinical study of 65 patients. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(11), 2523.‏

Leitão, C. I. M. B., de Oliveira Fernandes, G. V., Azevedo, L. P. P., Araújo, F. M., Donato, H., & Correia, A. R. M. (2021). Clinical performance of monolithic CAD/CAM tooth-supported zirconia restorations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthodontic Research.

Jubhari, E. H., & Lesal, E. (2021). Finish line for full coverage crown: A systematic review.‏ Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(1):1–4.

Oyar, P., Ulusoy, M., & Eskitaşçıoğlu, G. (2014). Finite element analysis of stress distribution in ceramic crowns fabricated with different tooth preparation designs. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 112(4), 871-877.

Published

25-04-2022

How to Cite

El-Ashkar, A. S., Ahmed, O. N., Taymour, M. A., & El-Tannir, A. M. (2022). One-year clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns restoring endodontically treated molars with two finish line designs. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 1960–1967. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.6496

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles