Temporalis fascia versus areolar temporalis fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty

A randomized comparative study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6522

Authors

  • Yarlagadda Lakshmi Sravya Resident, Department of ENT,KIMS, karad
  • A. D. Havle Prof & Hod, Department of ENT, KIMS, Karad
  • Kaenat Ahmed Resident, Department of ENT, KIMS, Karad

Keywords:

areolar temporalis fascia, temporalis fascia, tympanoplasty

Abstract

To study outcome of various autologous grafts used in cases of type-1 tympanoplasty. To compare between temporalis fascia and areolar temporalis fascia (Fool's fascia) used as a graft materials in type-1 tympanoplasty.Tympanoplasty is the commonest surgery of the middle ear carried out to improve hearing in patients with conductive hearing loss. Wullstein first coined the term tympanoplasty in 1953(1). Myringoplasty or type 1 tympanoplasty is an operation for reconstruction of a tympanic membrane perforation. Type I tympanoplasty refers to restoration normal anatomy of middle ear. Although the different graft materials are being used for closure of tympanic membrane perforation the most ideal material is unknown yet. Of the autologous materials, temporals fascia is the most frequently used for all perforations due to its easy availability, the abundance of tissue. Various other autologous materials have been used. They are either locally accessible such as periosteum, perichondrium either alone or with attached cartilage, subcutaneous tissue, skin from the external auditory canal (EAC) or elsewhere and also the fat. The fat is harvested usually from ear lobule or post auricular region though it can be from any other site. Fascia lata and vein are distantly located autograft. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wullstein H. Die Tympanoplastik als gehorverbessernde Operation bei Otitis Media chronica und ihr Resultate. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Otorhinolaryngology,1953.

Glasscock ME lll, Jackson CG, Nissen AJ, Schvaber MK. Postauricular undersurface tympanic membrane grafting: A follow-up report. Laryngoscope 1982;92(7 Pl 1):718-27. Sheehy JL, Anderson H.G. Myringoplasty. A review of 4 7 2 cases.Ann Oto! Rhino! Laryngol 1980;89(4 Pt 1):331-4.

Gibb AG, Chang SK. Myringoplasty (A review of 365 operations). J Laryngol Otol 1982;96:915-30.

Cueva RA, Areolar temporalis fascia: a reliable graft for tympanoplasty Am J Otol1999 Nov;20(6):709-11

Acuin J. World Health Organization. Chronic suppurative otitis media: Burden of illness and management options. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.

World Health Organisation/CIBA Foundation workshop reports, Prevention of Hearing Impairment from chronic otitis media, 1996.

Rupa V, Jacob A, Joseph A.Chronic suppurative otitis media: prevalence and practices among rural South Indian children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1999 May 25; 48(3):21721

Monasta L, Ronfani L, Marchetti F, et al.Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates. PLoS One 2012; 7: e36226.

Wright D, Safranek S. Treatment of otitis media with perforated tympanic membrane. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Apr 15. 79(8):650, 654. [Medline].

Mudry A. History of myringoplasty and tympanoplasty type I. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 139(5): 613–14.

Wullstein, H. Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1956; 66: 1076–93.

Aggarwal R, Saeed SR, Green KJ.Myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120(6): 429–32.

Karkanevatos A, De S, Srinivasan VR, et al. Day-case myringoplasty: five years’ experience. J Laryngol Otol 2003; 117(10): 763–5.

Gibb AG, Chang SK. Myringoplasty (A review of 365 operations). J Laryngol Otol 1982;96:915-30.

Glasscock ME lll, Jackson CG, Nissen AJ, Schvaber MK. Postauricular undersurface tympanic membrane grafting: A follow-up report. Laryngoscope 1982;92(7 Pl 1):718-27. Sheehy JL, Anderson H.G. Myringoplasty. A review of 4 7 2 cases.Ann Oto! Rhino! Laryngol 1980;89(4 Pt 1):331-4.

Zhang ZG, Huang QH, Zheng YQ, et al.Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32(8): 1234–8.

Saliba I. Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 2008; 33(6): 610–14.

Ringenberg JC. Closure of tympanic membrane perforations by the use of fat. Laryngoscope 1978; 88(6): 982–93.

King PF. The use of vein homografts in tympanoplasty. Ann Otol R Coll Surg Engl 1965; 37: 367–71.

Parekh A, Mantle B, Banks J, et al. Repair of the tympanic membrane with urinary bladder matrix. Laryngoscope 2009;119(6): 1206–13.

Rahman A, Olivius P, Dirckx J, et al.Stem cells and enhanced healing of chronic tympanic membrane perforation. Acta Otolaryngol 2008; 128(4): 352–9.

Fayad JN, Baino T, Parisier SC. Preliminary results with the use of AlloDerm in chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope 2003; 113(7): 1228–30.

Albera R, Dagna F, Lacilla M, Canale A. Equine versus bovine pericardium in transmeatal underlay myringoplasty. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009; 118(4): 287–91.

Myringoplasty: impact of perforation size on closure and audiological improvement. Wasson JD, Papadimitriou CE, Pau H J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Sep; 123(9):973-7.

Findings in revision myringoplasty.Vartiainen E Ear Nose Throat J. 1993 Mar; 72(3):201-4.

Bhardwaj, B., Singh, J. Comparative Study of Hearing Improvement of Type 1 Tympanoplasty Using Temporalis Fascia and Conchal Cartilage as Graft Material. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71, 1174–1178 (2019).

Neeraj et al, Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (November 2019) 71(Suppl 2):S1069–S1074.

Kadir Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and tragal cartilage perichondrium in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty with limited elevation of tympanomeatal flapBraz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(4):483---489.

R A Cueva et al(101),Areolar temporalis fascia: a reliable graft for tympanoplasty, Am J Otol, 1999 Nov;20(6):709-11

Published

25-04-2022

How to Cite

Sravya, Y. L., Havle, A. D., & Ahmed, K. (2022). Temporalis fascia versus areolar temporalis fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: A randomized comparative study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 3543–3550. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6522

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles