Occupational health and safety risk perception

Comparison between permanent and temporary workers

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6971

Authors

  • Lukman Handoko Doctoral Student of Public Health Faculty, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia | Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Tri Martiana Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sri Gunani Partiwi Industrial Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia

Keywords:

risk perception, temporary employees, deliberative, affective, experiential

Abstract

The perception of risk is an important element of many theories about changing safety behavior. Perceived risk is often subject to survival behavior change interventions. The perception of risk to occupational safety and health is an important factor in the success of the work accident prevention program. Risk perception is an important determinant of safety behavior, although the nature of the relationship between risk perception and safety behavior may depend on the profile of different types of risk perception and the accuracy of the perception. The perception of workers, both permanent and non-permanent workers, on occupational safety and health and accident prevention with risk perceptions is an important factor in the success of this accident prevention program. This study aims to find out more about adapting the TRIRISK model for intentionally perceived risk in the context of perception. By assessing the role of the deliberative, affective, and experiential dimensions of safety and health risks in the workplace. Quantitative research was conducted by means of a survey with a questionnaire. The survey was conducted from November to December 2021 and obtained as many as 102 respondents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almani, H. et al. (2014) ‘PERSEPSI KARYAWAN TERHADAP PENERAPAN SISTEM MANAJEMEN KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA DI PT. SEMEN TONASA Employees Perceptions towards the Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety Management System at PT. SemenTonasa’, pp. 43–50.

Barber, B. M. and Odean, T. (2005) ‘Boys will be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment’, SSRN Electronic Journal, (September). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.139415.

Basha, S. A. and Maiti, J. (2013) ‘Relationships of demographic factors , job risk perception and work injury in a steel plant in India’, Safety Science. Elsevier Ltd, 51(1), pp. 374–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.005.

Chin, W. W. (1998) ‘The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling.’, Modern methods for business research, (April), pp. 295–336.

Deaves, G. B. and R. (2006) ‘Behavioral Finance: Back on the Road Again’, Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(1), pp. 58–58. doi: 10.1207/s15427579jpfm0701_6.

Ferrer, R. A. et al. (2016) ‘The Tripartite Model of Risk Perception (TRIRISK): Distinguishing Deliberative, Affective, and Experiential Components of Perceived Risk’, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(5), pp. 653–663. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9790-z.

Ferrer, R. A. et al. (2018) ‘When does risk perception predict protection motivation for health threats? A person-by-situation analysis.’, PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0191994.

Ferrer, R. A. and Klein, W. M. P. (2015) ‘Risk perceptions and health behavior’, Current Opinion in Psychology. Elsevier Ltd, 5, pp. 85–89. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012.

Jeong, J. Y., Crompton, J. L. and Lee, K. Y. (2022) ‘Applying the TRIRISK model to COVID-19 in tourism: A comparison between 2020 and 2021’, Tourism Management Perspectives. Elsevier Ltd, 41(January), p. 100936. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100936.

Pramana, C. et al. (2020) ‘KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND PRACTICES OF USING MASKS BY THE COMMUNITY DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN INDONESIA’, PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(9), pp. 4800–4808.

Riedinger, C. et al. (2022) ‘Analysis of the components of cancer risk perception and links with intention and behaviour: A UK-based study’, PLoS ONE, 17(1 January), pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262197.

Riley, W. B. and Chow, K. V. (1992) ‘Asset Allocation and Individual Risk Aversion’, Financial Analysts Journal, 48(6), pp. 32–37. doi: 10.2469/faj.v48.n6.32.

Rizkiyah, E., Susanto, N. and Nugroho, S. (2016) ‘Perbedaan Persepsi Risiko Ditinjau Dari Gender Pada Kegiatan Pendakian Gunung’, Industrial Engineering Online Journal, 5(4), pp. 1–5. Available at: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/ieoj/article/view/14115.

Short, S. E. et al. (2004) ‘The Relationships Among Three Components of Perceived Risk of Injury, Previous Injuries and Gender in Contact Sport Athletes’, Athletic Insight, 6(3), pp. 38–46.

Siburian, A. (2012) ‘Gambaran Penggunaan Alat Pelindung Diri (APD) Terhadap Keselamatan Kerja Perawat IGD RSUD Pasar Rebo Jakarta’, Skripsi, pp. 1–56. Available at: lontar.ui.ac.id.

Susilawaty, A. et al. (2021) ‘Attitude, Risk Perception and Public Acceptance against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Indonesia’, Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(E SE-Public Health Legislation), pp. 717–721. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6635.

Wang, J., Zou, P. X. W. and Li, P. P. (2016) ‘Critical factors and paths influencing construction workers’ safety risk tolerances.’, Accident Analysis & Prevention. Pergamon, pp. 267–279. doi: 10.1016/J.AAP.2015.11.027.

Published

06-05-2022

How to Cite

Handoko, L., Martiana, T., & Partiwi, S. G. (2022). Occupational health and safety risk perception: Comparison between permanent and temporary workers. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 4852–4861. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.6971

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)