Comparing the efficacy of movement with mobilization in respect to graded mobilization in adhesive capsulitis of shoulder
Keywords:
adhesive capsulitis, passive movement, mobilization, range motion, painAbstract
Adhesive Capsulitis is a clinical syndrome with painful restriction of both active and passive movements. The conSSdition is aggravated by systemic problems like diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Prolonged activity causes small scapular and biceps muscles to waste faster, load on joint increases and degenerative changes sets in. capsule is fibrosed and shoulder movements are decreased. If the movements are continued, then the fibrosis gradually breaks, movement returns but never come back to normal. Thus, we hypothesize that there will be no significant difference between movement with mobilization and graded mobilization on functional performance in adhesive capsulitis. Total 60 subjects were taken for this study as per inclusion & exclusion criteria. Each group consists of 30 subjects. Treatment in both the groups was given for 15 days continuously. Group A received Movement with mobilization technique whereas Group B received graded mobilizations. The outcome measures used were VAS scale for measuring pain, ROM of the shoulder joint movements using goniometer, power of the muscle assessed through MMT, quality of sleep assessed through Pittsburgh sleep quality Index and Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI). T
Downloads
References
Gray H: Anatomy of the human body. Lea and Febiger Philadelphia and New York (P) LTD, Twentieth edition 2007: 317-320
Drake RL, Vogl AW, Mitchell AWM: Gray’s Anatomy. Elsevier publication (P) LTD, Fourth edition, 2020: 695-698
Chaurasia BD: Human anatomy. CBS publication and Distributions (P) LTD, Sixth edition, 2013;1: 144
Neumann DA: Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system. Elsevier publication (P) LTD, Third edition, 2017.124-147
Shrivastava A, Shyam A, Sancheti P: Randomized controlled study of Mulligan’s Versus Maitland’s Mobilization Technique in Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder joint. Indian journal of physiotherapy and Occupational therapy 2011; 5: 12-15.
Mulligan B: 2nd international mulligan concept conference. F.N.Z.S.P (Hon.) 2011: 6-9.
Arshad HS, Shah IH, Nasir RH: Comparison of Mulligan Mobilization with movement and end range mobilization following Maitland Techniques in patient with frozen shoulder in improving range of motion. International journal of Science and research 2015; 4: 2761-2767.
Kumar, S. (2022). A quest for sustainium (sustainability Premium): review of sustainable bonds. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Vol. 26, no.2, pp. 1-18
Rathod D, Priyanka G, Palkar A: Comparative study of Kaltenborn Mobilization versus Mulligan Mobilization in patient with Frozen Shoulder. International journal of Health Sciences and Researches 2019; 9: 320-324.
Kazmi SAM et al. Comparative study on the efficacy of Maitland technique (grade IV) and mulligan technique, in the treatment of frozen shoulder. Pakistan Journal of rehabilitation 2013; 2: 10.
Haider R et al. To compare effect of Maitland and Mulligan’s mobilization techniques in the treatment of frozen shoulder. Annals 2014; 20: 257-263.
Shamsi S: An analysis upon comparison of Mulligan’s Vs. Maitland’s mobilization techniques in improving Neck pain, Disability, ROM in Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder Joint. Journal of advances in Sciences and Technology 2015; 8: 1-4.
Noten S et al. The efficacy of different types of mobilization techniques in patients with primary adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a systematic review. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2015: 1-30.
Machado M: The effect of mobilization with movement versus Maitland mobilizations on range of motion and shoulder function in patients with adhesive capsulitis: A meta- analysis. 2017: 1-72.
R.K. Minerva et al. To compare the effectiveness of Maitland versus Mulligan Mobilization in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis of shoulder. International journal of Health Sciences and Researches 2016; 6: 236-244.
Reddy BC and Metgud S: A randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of Mulligan MWM and Conventional therapy in stage -2 in adhesive capsulitis. Indian Journal of physical therapy 2015; 3: 55-59.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
