Various prosthetic rehabilitation for mucormycosis

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.7183

Authors

  • Bhupender Yadav Professor, Department of prosthodontics, Faculty of dental sciences SGT University, Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Taniya Malhotra PG Student, Department of prosthodontics, Faculty of dental sciences SGT University, Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Pankaj Ritwal Senior lecturer Department of prosthodontics, Faculty of dental sciences SGT University, Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Omkar Shetty Dean and Professor of prosthodontics, Faculty of dental sciences SGT University, Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Abhishek Nagpal Professor and Head Department of prosthodontics, Faculty of dental sciences SGT University, Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India
  • Diksha Singh Senior lecturer Department of prosthodontics, Faculty of dental sciences SGT University, Budhera, Gurugram, Haryana, India

Keywords:

mucormycosis, prosthodontic rehabilitation, surgical resection

Abstract

Mucormycosis is a form of fungal infection that is invasive and rapidly progressive, thereby including nose and paranasal sinuses of the head and neck region with high mortality and morbidity. Compromised immunity such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, Leukaemia, long-term use of steroids are the most common causes of the disease. Acute surgical resection is performed that involves the resectioning of the affected maxillofacial structures such as orbit, maxilla and / or nose in such conditions. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of these large maxillofacial defects is challenging. Lack of retention due to dislodging forces exerted by scarred post-surgical soft tissues, lack of bony base, missing structures of the posterior palatal seal area, multiple defect sites and compromised medical status due to comorbidities are the numerous problems are encountered during the rehabilitation of such defects. The basic principle of any prosthetic rehabilitation design includes the preservation of the remaining natural tissues along with retention, stability, support, and aesthetics. Fixed or Removable Prosthodontic rehabilitation can be performed depending on the available supporting structures.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Margo CE, Linden C, Strickland-Marmol LB, Denietolis AL, McCaffrey JC, Kirk N, et al. Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis With Perineural Spread. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23(4):326–7.

Reddy SS, Rakesh N, Chauhan P, Sharma S. Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis Among Diabetic Patients: An Emerging Trend. Mycopathologia. 2015;180(5-6):389–96.

Etienne OMG, Taddei AMI. Case report. Use of bar-clip attachments to enhance the retention of a maxillofacial prosthetic obturator: a clinical report. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:618-21.

Dichamp J, Razouk O, Sidibe CA, et al. An obturator prosthesis in a patient with perfect dentition. Functional, esthetic approach. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1994;95:195-6.

Etienne OMG, Taddei AMI. Case report. Use of bar-clip attachments to enhance the retention of a maxillofacial prosthetic obturator: a clinical report. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:618-21.

Blair FM, Hunter NR. The hollow box maxillary obturator. Br Dent J 1998;184:484-7.

Ortegon SM, Martin JW, Lewin JS. A hollow delayed surgical obturator for a bilateral subtotal maxillectomy patient: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:14-8.

Chiapasco M, Biglioli F, Auteliano L, et al. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006;17:220-8.

Gowda ME, Mohan MS, Verma K, Roy ID. Implant rehabilitation of partial maxillectomy edentulous patient. ContempClinDent.2013;4(3):393-396.

Ueda M, Hibino Y, Niimi A. Usefulness of dental implants in maxillofacial reconstruction. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1999;9:349-66.

Riley MA, Walmsley AD, Harris IR. Magnets in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:137-42.

Gaur V, Patel K, Palka L An implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a bilateral subtotal maxillectomy defect secondary to rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis: A clinical report of a graftless approach,J Prosthet Dent 2021

Sakuraba M, Kimata Y, Ota Y, et al. Simple maxillary reconstruction using free tissue transfer and protheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:594-8.

Yoshinaka M, Yoshinaka MF, Ikebe Y, et al.: Factors associated with taste dissatisfaction in the elderly. J Oral Rehabil. 2007, 34:497-502.

Published

11-05-2022

How to Cite

Yadav, B., Malhotra, T., Ritwal, P., Shetty, O., Nagpal, A., & Singh, D. (2022). Various prosthetic rehabilitation for mucormycosis. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 8501–8509. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.7183

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles