Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of different endodontic sealers against Enterococcus Faecalis

An in-vitro study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7295

Authors

  • Pallavi Post graduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, India
  • Abhishek Bansal Proffessor, MDS, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, India
  • Navneet Kukreja Professor and Head, MDS, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, India
  • Narinder Kaur Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, MM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, India
  • Swati Chhabra Assistant Professor, MDS, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, India
  • Jasika Ahuja Post Graduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M College of Dental Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, India

Keywords:

Agar diffusion test, Enterococcus faecalis, inhibition zone

Abstract

Aim: The aim and objective of this invitro study was to determine antimicrobial activity of root canal sealer (AH Plus, Sealapex, MTA Fillapex) against Enterococcus faecalis. Materials and Methods: Three different commercially available root canal sealers namely - AH-Plus (Dentsply), MTA Fillapex (Angelus, bioceramic sealer) and Sealapex sealer (Kerr) were evaluated for their antimicrobial potential against Enterococcus faecalis (E.faecalis )using agar diffusion method. Wells were formed in the agar plates by removing agar at equal distance and then, filled with the endodontic sealers- AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex. Standard antibiotic disc of co-trimoxazole was kept as a control. Petri dishes were inoculated at 37 ℃ at a time interval of 24 and 48 hours. The diameter of growth of inhibition zone were measured by using Antibiotic zone scale (HIMEDIA). The difference between the groups were evaluated by one -way ANOVA and intergroup evaluation was done by Tukey’s post hic test. Result: AH-Plus sealer showed larger zone of inhibition as compared to sealapex and MTA Fillapex sealer against E.faecalis at 24 and 48 hours. Co- trimoxazole used as control exhibited the highest antimicrobial efficacy against E.faecalis at 24 and 48 hour. MTA Fillapex showed least antimicrobial action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arora R, Rawat P, Bhayya DP. A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of three endodontic sealers: Endoflas FS, AH Plus and sealapex against Enterococcus faecalis-an in vitro study. J Dent Med Sci. 2014; 13(3): 90-93.

Seelan RG, Kumar AA, Sam RJ, Maheswari SU. Antimicrobial efficacy of different root canal sealers by using real-time polymerase chain reaction: An ex vivo study. J Conserv Dent 2015; 18(6):474-478.

Cohen’s Pathways of the pulp, ELSEVIER. 2013, first south asia ed: 292

Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U. Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radio Endodontology. 1998; 85(1): 86-93.

Geetha RV, Veeraraghavan VP. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of five root canal sealants against enterococcus faecalis-an in vitro study. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2016; 40(2): 221-223.

Oh S, Perinpanayagam H, Kum DJ, Lim SM, Yoo YJ, Chang SW, Lee W, Baek SH, Zhu Q, Kum KY. Evaluation of three obturation techniques in the apical third of mandibular first molar mesial root canals using micro-computed tomography. J Den Sci 2016; 11(1): 95-102

Vibha H, Rathod R. Assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of bioceramic sealer, epiphany self-etch sealer, and AH-Plus sealer against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. J. Endod. 2017; 29(2): 151-155.

Zhang H, Shen Y, Ruse ND, Haapasalo M. Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2009; 35(7): 1051-1055

Kayaoglu G, Ørstavik D. Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: relationship to endodontic disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004; 15: 308-320.

Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ: Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2003, 36:1-11

Chhabra S, Manu, Bansal A, Kukreja N, Sharma A, Singh G: evaluating antibacterial efficacy of antibiotic, antiinflammatory non antibiotics and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcous faecalis in an endodontic model: an in-vitro study. Turk J Physiother Rehabil.2021, 32(3):13980-13986.

Singh H: Microbiology of endodontic infections. J Dent Oral Hyg 2016; 2:1-4.

Jhajharia K, Parolia A, Shetty KV, Mehta LK: Biofilm in endodontics: a review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015; 5:1-12.

Narayanan LL, Vaishnavi C: Endodontic microbiology. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13:233-239

Poggio C, Trovati F, Ceci M, Colombo M, Pietrocola G. Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis. J clin exp dent 2017; 9(6): 743

Trivedi S, Chhabra S, Bansal A, et al. Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2020;21(3):291–295.

Al-Haddad A, Ab Aziz C, Zeti A. Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: a review. Int J Biomater 2016; 2016.

Estrela C, Bammann LL, Pimenta FC, Pécora JD. Control of microorganisms in vitro by calcium hydroxide pastes. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 341 5.

Published

13-05-2022

How to Cite

Pallavi, P., Bansal, A., Kukreja, N., Kaur, N., Chhabra, S., & Ahuja, J. (2022). Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of different endodontic sealers against Enterococcus Faecalis: An in-vitro study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 9838–9845. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7295

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)