A study to compare the efficacy of two different doses of esmolol to attenuate the hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7297

Authors

  • Sagana MBBS 2nd year postgraduate, College - Vinayaka mission kirupanda variyar medical college and hospital, Department of anesthesiology
  • Poorna Avadhani MBBS MD, College - Vinayaka mission kirupanda variyar medical college and hospital, Department of anesthesiology
  • Brindha MBBS DA MD, College - Vinayaka mission kirupanda variyar medical college and hospital, Department of anesthesiology

Keywords:

Induction, Anaesthesia, Blood Pressure, Hemodynamic Stability

Abstract

Background: General anaesthesia is an altered physiological state characterized by reversible loss of consciousness, amnesia ,analgesia and some degree of muscle relaxation.no single agents can produce these desired effects.It involves inhalational anaesthetics,induction agents, opioids, neuromuscular blockers. Combination of all these drugs will produce the optimal anaesthesia which is known as balanced anaesthesia. Airway management is an integral part of general anaesthesia, which includes direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Objective: To compare the efficacy of two different doses of esmolol to attenuate the hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Methodology: The present comparative cross sectional study was conducted by the Department of Anaesthesia at Vinayaka Missions KirupanandaVariyar Medical College and Hospital, Salem from December 2019 – May 2021. The comparative study was done between two study groups with Group A receiving 50 mg of IV Esmolol and Group B Receiving 100 mg of IV Esmolol, A total of 60 study patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the Study and divided into 30 subjects in each group. Results: The mean age of the patients in Group A was 37.3 (12.0) years with a minimum of 18 years and a maximum of 60 years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. CARDIOVASCULAR AND CATECHOLAMINE RESPONSES TO LARYNGOSCOPY WITH AND WITHOUT TRACHEAL INTUBATION. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1987 Mar;59(3):295–9.

Hassan HG, el-Sharkawy TY, Renck H, Mansour G, Fouda A. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs. without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Jul;35(5):442–7.

Kn G, Mallappa K, Gl R. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation by intravenous esmolol. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014;2(3):866.

Bucx MJL, Geel RTMV, Scheck P a. E, Stijnen T. Cardiovascular effects of forces applied during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1992;47(12):1029–33.

yshire, D. R., Chmielewski, A., Fell, D., Vater, M., Achola, K., and Smith, G.. Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation. Br. J. Anaesth.1983; 55: 855-862.

Reid LC, Brace DE. Irritation of the respiratory tract and its reflex effect upon heart. Surg Gynaec&Obst; 1940; 70: 157-62.

Ebert TJ, Bernstein JS, Stowe DF, Roerig D, Kampine JP. Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to rapid sequence induction and intubation in healthy patients with a single bolus of esmolol. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 1990 Jul 1;2(4):243–52.

Goodman & Gilman’s: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 13e | AccessMedicine | McGraw-Hill Medical [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 12]. Available from: https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/book.aspx?bookID=2189

Henderson J. In: Airway management in the adult. Miller's Anaesthesia. 7th ed. Miller RD, editor. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. pp. 1573–610.

Menkhaus PG, Reves JG, Kissin I, Alvis JM, Govier AV, Samuelson PN, et al. Cardiovascular effects of esmolol in anesthetized humans. AnesthAnalg. 1985;64:327–34.

Cucchiara RF, Benefiel DJ, Matteo RS, DeWood M, Albin MS. Evaluation of esmolol in controlling increases in heart rate and blood pressure during endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology. 1986;65:528–31

Miller DR, Martineace J. Esmolol for control of haemodynamic responses during anesthetic induction. Can J Anaesth. 1989;36:S165–6.

Sheppard S, Eagle CJ, Strunin L. A bolus dose of esmolol attenuates tachycardia and hypertension after tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37:202–5.

Gupta S, Tank P. A comparative study of efficacy of esmolol and fentanyl for pressure attenuation during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5(1):2–8.

Mulimani SM, Talikoti DG, Vastrad VV, Sorganvi VM. Efficacy of a Bolus Dose of Esmolol and Bolus Dose of Lignocaine for Attenuating the Pressor Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in General Anesthesia: A Comparative Study. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13(2):292–6

Helfman SM, Gold MI, DeLisser EA, Herrington CA. Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation: lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol? AnesthAnalg. 1991 Apr;72(4):482–6.

.Feng CK, Chan KH, Liu KN, Or CH, Lee TY. A comparison of lidocaine, fentanyl, and esmolol for attenuation of cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1996;34:61–7.

Published

13-05-2022

How to Cite

Sagana, S., Avadhani, P., & Brindha, B. (2022). A study to compare the efficacy of two different doses of esmolol to attenuate the hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 11446–11454. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7297

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles