To evaluate the crestal bone loss in mandibular implant overdenture via locator and ball socket attachments

An in - vivo study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.7633

Authors

  • Madhav Post Graduate 3-year Student) Shree Bankey Bihari dental college, Ghaziabad (U.P.)
  • Sukant Sahoo Head of the Department, Shree Bankey Bihari dental college, Ghaziabad (U.P.)
  • Aakarshan Dayal Gupta Reader, Shree Bankey Bihari dental college, Ghaziabad (U.P.)
  • Yukti Sharma Senior lecturer, Shree Bankey Bihari dental college, Ghaziabad (U.P.)
  • Aparana Sharma Senior lecturer, Shree Bankey Bihari dental college, Ghaziabad (U.P.)
  • Shaik Arafath Post Graduate 2-year Student, Shree Bankey Bihari dental college, Ghaziabad (U.P.)

Keywords:

implants, edentulism, crestal bone loss, ball socket attachment, locator attachment, overdenture

Abstract

Edentulism is a debilitating and irreversible condition and is described as final marker of disease burden for oral health. Rehabilitating edentulous  patients with residual ridge resorption has improved  tremendously because of Implant dentistry . Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the crestal bone loss in mandibular implant over denture via locator and ballsocket attachments: An In - Vivo study. Material and method: This study was undertaken in the Department of Prosthodontics and Crown &Bridge Methodology • According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, twenty subjects were selected for this study. OPG radiographs were recorded for each subject. They were divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. • Group A subjects (10) received ball and socket retained mandibular implant overdenture against a maxillary complete denture with ball diameter of 2.25mm and gingival height of 3mm while Group B subjects (10) received locator retained mandibular implant overdenture. Results The result obtained was subject to comparison by ANOVA statistical analysis. It was found that for ball and socket attachment, highest crestal bone was observed on the mesial aspect of the right implant followed by the distal aspect of the same implant. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carlsson G E. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1998 Jan 1;79(1):17-23.

Boerrigter E M, Geertman M E, Van Oort R P, Bouma J, Raghoebar G M, Van Waas Ma, Van't Hof Ma, Boering G, Kalk W. Patient Satisfaction with ImplantRetained Mandibular Overdentures. A Comparison with New Complete Dentures Not Retained by Implants—A Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1995 Oct 1;33(5):282-8.

Varshney N, Gupta S, Aggarwal S, Kumar S, Sadish M, Khan M. Hard and SoftTissue Evaluation of Bar-Clip, Ball-Socket, And Kerator Attachments in Mandibular Implant Overdenture Treatment: An In Vivo Study. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2019 Oct 1;19(4):296

Tymstra N, Raghoebar G M, Vissink A, Meijer H J. Maxillary Anterior and Mandibular Posterior Residual Ridge Resorption in Patients Wearing a Mandibular Implant‐Retained Overdenture. Journal Of Oral Rehabilitation. 2011 Jul;38(7):509-16.

Assunção W G, Barão V A, Delben J A, Gomes E A, Tabata L F. A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: a literature review. Gerodontology. 2010 Jun;27(2):154-62.

Wright P S. Two Implants for All Edentulous Mandibles. British Dental Journal. 2006 Apr;200(8):469-.

Boerrigter E M, Geertman M E, Van Oort R P, Bouma J, Raghoebar G M, Van Waas Ma, Van't Hof Ma, Boering G, Kalk W. Patient Satisfaction with ImplantRetained Mandibular Overdentures. A Comparison with New Complete Dentures Not Retained by Implants—A Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1995 Oct 1;33(5):282-8.

Heydecke G, Thomason J M, Lund J P, Feine J S. The Impact of Conventional and Implant Supported Prostheses on Social and Sexual Activities in Edentulous Adults: Results from A Randomized Trial 2 Months After Treatment. Journal Of Dentistry. 2005 Sep 1;33(8):649-57.

. Chung K H, Chung C Y, Cagna D R, Cronin J R R. Retention Characteristics of Attachment Systems for Implant Overdentures. Journal Of Prosthodontics: Implant, Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. 2004 Dec;13(4):221-6.

Kim H Y, Lee J Y, Shin S W, Bryant S R. Attachment Systems for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2012 Nov;4(4):197.

Ma S, Tawse‐Smith A, Thomson W, Payne A. Marginal bone loss with mandibular two‐implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2010; 23:321-32.

Published

21-05-2022

How to Cite

Madhav, M., Sahoo, S., Gupta, A. D., Sharma, Y., Sharma, A., & Arafath, S. (2022). To evaluate the crestal bone loss in mandibular implant overdenture via locator and ball socket attachments: An in - vivo study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 10084–10096. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.7633

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles