Mechanical properties and clinical performance of different brands of nickel titanium archwires following intraoral use

A prospective clinical trial

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.7698

Authors

  • Omar A. E. Salama Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt
  • Amira Aboalnaga Lecturer in Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
  • Rania Salama Lecturer in Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
  • Fouad A. El-Sharaby Professor of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt
  • Essam Nassif Professor of Orthodontics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt

Keywords:

nickel titanium, plateau slope, dentaurum, American orthodontic, IMD orthodontic

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of intraoral use of three brands of nickel titanium archwires on their mechanical properties and crowding relief ability. Methods: Three groups (n=39) of 0.016” round NiTi archwires: Dentaurum (A), American Orthodontics (B) and IMD Orthodontics (C) were subdivided according to the intervention (n=13) into: As-received, no intervention (subgroup 1), in-vivo (subgroup 2), and in-vitro (subgroup 3). Plateau slope, resilience, and elastic modulus of all wires were tested using a universal testing machine. The relief of crowding following intraoral use for 8 weeks was assessed using Little’s irregularity index. Results were significant at p ≤ 0.05. Results: For all NiTi brands, the highest plateau slope value; among the subgroups, was recorded following the intraoral use (in-vivo). For the in-vivo wires (subgroup 2), the Dentaurum wires revealed the lowest plateau slope value (0.258 N/mm ±0.032) while the IMD wires revealed the lowest resilience values (36.24 J.mm-3 ±0.6). There was no significant difference in the modulus of elasticity of wires between all 3 subgroups. The Little’s irregularity index decreased over time, and the difference between the groups was not significant. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of inter-canine width. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Hamanaka H. The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1986; 90(1):1-10.

Lombardo L, Toni G, Mazzanti V, Mollica F, Spedicato GA, Siciliani G. The mechanical behavior of as received and retrieved nickel titanium orthodontic archwires. Prog Orthod. 2019; 20(1):1.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2016). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. J Mater Environ Sci. 2007; 39(2):175-91.

Sri A, Amal S, Hussain S, Amin Jalaluddin M. Preparation of Artificial Saliva Formulation. Proceeding - ICB Pharma II . 2015;(October 2015):7.

Berzins D, Brantley W. Adverse effects from orthodontic alloys. In: Orthodontic Applications of Biomaterials. 2017.

Harris EF, Newman SM, Nicholson JA. Nitinol arch wire in a simulated oral environment. Changes in mechanical properties. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988; 93(6):508-13.

LaMorte W. Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies. Bost Univ Coll Public Heal. 2013;

Bakar NA, Mcdonald F, Tan L. Comparison of Mechanical Properties between Different Orthodontic Stainless Steel Archwires. 2017;3(8).

Burstone CJ, Qin B, Morton JY. Chinese NiTi wire--a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod. 1985 Jun;87(6):445–52.

JM O, MGD J, J G, RS N, GF C. Stiffness-deflection behavior of selected orthodontic wires. Angle Orthod. 1997;67(3):209–2018.

Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J. 2000 Jul;33(4):297–310.

Amaya S, Pérez A, Guzmán H, Espinosa A, Motta G, Mojica J, et al. Changes in the mechanical properties of two nickel-titanium archwires after 3 months of clinical usage. J World Fed Orthod. 2020;9(4):175–180.

Nakano H, Satoh K, Norris R, Jin T, Kamegai T, Ishikawa F, et al. Mechanical properties of several nickel-titanium alloy wires in three-point bending tests. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115(4):390-5.

Santoro M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Pseudoelasticity and thermoelasticity of nickel-titanium alloys: A clinically oriented review. Part I: Temperature transitional ranges. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001; 119(6):587-93.

Ferreira M do A, Luersen MA, Borges PC. Nickel-titanium alloys: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(3):71–82.

Lombardo L, Ceci M, Mollica F, Mazzanti V, Palone M, Siciliani G. Mechanical properties of multi-force vs. conventional NiTi archwires. J Orofac Orthop = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie Organ/official J Dtsch Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie. 2019 Mar;80(2):57–67.

Garrec P, B T, L J. Evolution of flexural rigidity according to the cross- sectional dimension of a superelastic nickel titanium orthodontic wire. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(4):402–7.

Walker MP, White RJ, Kula KS. Effect of fluoride prophylactic agents on the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium-based orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2005 Jun;127(6):662–9.

Holec D, Bojda O, Dlouhý A. Ni4Ti3 precipitate structures in Ni-rich NiTi shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;

RM L. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1975;68(5):554–63.

Evans TJ, Durning P. Aligning archwires, the shape of things to come?--a fourth and fifth phase of force delivery. Br J Orthod. 1996; 23(3):269-75

Proffit W, Fields H, Sarver D. The Orthodontic Problem. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis. 2013.

Arnold DT, Dalstra M, Verna C. Torque resistance of different stainless steel wires commonly used for fixed retainers in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2016 Jun;43(2):121–9.

Evans TJ, Jones ML, Newcombe RG. Clinical comparison and performance perspective of three aligning arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 1998 Jul;114(1):32–9.

Kapila S, Sachdeva R. Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 1989 Aug;96(2):100–9.

M R, D B. A systematic review of clinical trials of aligning archwires. J Orthod. 2009;36(1):42–51.

Jain S, Sharma P, Shetty D. Comparison of two different initial archwires for tooth alignment during fixed orthodontic treatment-A randomized clinical trial. J Orthod Sci. 2021; 10:13.

Published

22-05-2022

How to Cite

Salama, O. A. E., Aboalnaga, A., Salama, R., El-Sharaby, F. A., & Nassif, E. (2022). Mechanical properties and clinical performance of different brands of nickel titanium archwires following intraoral use: A prospective clinical trial. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 2620–2634. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.7698

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)