Dense connected convolution neural network for land cover classification

K. Ragul; K. Karthikeyan

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.7729

Authors

K. Ragul Research Scholar, Department of Computer Science, Pioneer College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, India
K. Karthikeyan Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Pioneer College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, India

Keywords:

dense model, hyperspectral image, classification, principle component analysis, discriminate convolution neural network

Abstract

Hyperspectral Imaging is employed to monitor the earth regions on basis of spectral continuous data ranges initializing from visible wave infrared region to short wave infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum. It authorizes the detailed recognition and classification of land cover on account of spectral feature space. Hyperspectral images seemed to be presented by employing traditional unsupervised and supervised classifier with regards to classification. Various problems seemed to cause Hughes phenomenon as it represents the curse of dimensionality issues. In spite of mitigating those challenges, a deep ensemble classification model seemed to be proposed in this work. It process the data features using various convolution layers of the network along modelling the activation function as a simple structure for classification of the hyperspectral data based on the spectral values using Softmax layer and error function to minimize the losses. Dense Connected Convolution Neural Network projected in this work as it has high potential to effectively classify the spectral features with learnt weights from one individual convolution layer to convolution layers. The main idea of Dense Convolution Neural Network is to produce discriminative classification results and to enhance the accuracy and diversity of a classifier simultaneously.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Fauvel, J. A. Benediktsson, J. Chanussot, and J. R. Sveinsson, “Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 3804–3814, Nov. 2008

L. He, Y. Li, X. Li, and W. Wu, “Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral images via spatial translation-invariant wavelet-based sparse representation,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 2696– 2712, May 2015

P. Ghamisi et al., “New frontiers in spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification: the latest advances based on mathematical morphology, markov random fields, segmentation, sparse representation, and deep learning,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Mag., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 10–43, Sep. 2018.

B. Waske, S. van der Linden, J. Benediktsson, A. Rabe, and P. Hostert, “Sensitivity of support vector machines to random feature selection in classification of hyperspectral data,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 2880–2889, Jul. 2010

J. Muñoz-Marí, F. Bovolo, L. Gómez-Chova, L. Bruzzone, and G. Camp-Valls, “Semisupervised one-class support vector machines for classification of remote sensing data,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 3188–3197, 2010.

J. Xia, M. D. Mura, J. Chanussot, P. Du, and X. He, “Random subspace ensembles for hyperspectral image classification with extended morphological attribute profiles,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 4768–4786, Sep. 2015.

Y. Y. Tang, H. Yuan, and L. Li, “Manifold-based sparse representation for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 7606–7618, Dec. 2014

P. Du, J. Xia, W. Zhang, K. Tan, Y. Liu, and S. Liu, “Multiple classifier system for remote sensing image classification: A review,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 4764–4792, 2012.

J. Xia, P. Ghamisi, N. Yokoya, and A. Iwasaki, “Random forest ensembles and extended multiextinction profiles for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 202–216, Jan. 2018.

B. Rivard, J. Feng, A. Gallie, and A. Sanchez-Azofeifa, “Continuous wavelets for the improved use of spectral libraries and hyperspectral data,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 112, pp. 2850–2862, 2008.

Schmalz, M.S., Ritter, G.X., Urcid, G.: Autonomous single-pass endmember approximation using lattice auto-associative memories. In: 10th Joint Conference on Information Sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam (preprint, 2008) (Special Issue)

Yookesh, T. L., et al. "Efficiency of iterative filtering method for solving Volterra fuzzy integral equations with a delay and material investigation." Materials today: Proceedings 47 (2021): 6101-6104

O. E. Malahlela, M. A. Cho, and O. Mutanga, “Mapping the occurrence of chromolaena odorata (L.) in subtropical forest gaps using environmental and remote sensing data,” Biol. Invasions, vol. 17, pp. 2027–2042, Jul. 2015.

Y. Qian, M. Ye, and J. Zhou, “Hyperspectral image classification based on structured sparse logistic regression and three-dimensional wavelet texture features,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 2276–2291, Apr. 2013.

Y. Tarabalka, M. Fauvel, J. Chanussot, and J. A. Benediktsson, “SVMand MRF-based method for accurate classification of hyperspectral images,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 736–740, Oct. 2010.

K. Jia, B. Wu, Y. Tian, Y. Zeng, and Q. Li, “Vegetation classification method with biochemical composition estimated from remote sensing data,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 32, pp. 9307–9325, 2011.