Analysis on ergonomic factors and workload of female civil government employees in the local government offices of Sorong

Febry Talakua; Baktianita Ratna Etnis; Ivana Ribka Nasedum; Yulinda Margaret Bambungan; Exaudian F. Lerebulan

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.7791

Authors

Febry Talakua Lecturer of the Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Public Health Sciences, Papuan College of Health Science
Baktianita Ratna Etnis Lecturer of the Department of Public Health Sciences
Ivana Ribka Nasedum Lecturer of the Department of Nursing Sciences, Papuan College of Health Science
Yulinda Margaret Bambungan Lecturer of the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Papuan College of Health Science
Exaudian F. Lerebulan Lecturer of the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Papuan College of Health Science

Keywords:

Ergonomic Factors, Workloads, Female Civil Government Employee

Abstract

Background: Based on the initial survey conducted by researchers, ergonomic problems were found in the female Civil Government Employees (Pegawai Negeri Sipil, PNS), including the fact that most female Civil Government Employees are old. Most female Civil Government Employees went to the office without having breakfast. The desks and chairs at work were not designed ergonomically. The work station was located in the fourth floor without an escalator, causing fatigue. The room temperature and lighting are unfitting. These problems are disadvantageous for their workloads. Objectives: The objective of this research is to find out the influence of ergonomic factors on female Civil Employees’ workloads in the Local Government Offices of Sorong City. Methods: The method applied in this research is the analytical survey with a cross-sectional design. The applied sampling method was random sampling stratification, with 104 samples. The data is collected using questionnaires. The data analysis includes univariate, bivariate, and multivariate, applying the Chi Square (X²) test and multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Research Results: The bivariate test result shows that workloads are influenced by the following factors: age (p=0.002), nutritional status (p=0.002), working behavior (p=0.003), tools layout (p=0.001), working environment (p=0.001).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Santosa, G. 2013. Ergonomi Terapan. Jakarta: Prestasi pustaka.

Handayani, E. 2009. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja. http://www.fone indoskripsi.com: Diakses Tanggal 28 Perbuari 2015.

Biro Pusat Statistik. 2013. Propinsi Papua Barat dalam Angka Tahun 2013. Manokwari.

BKD Kota Sorong. 2015. Data Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Sorong: Badan Kepegawaian Daerah.

As’ad, M. 2003. Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Suma’mur, P.K. 2011. Higiene Perusahaan dan Kesehatan Kerja (Hiperkes). Jakarta: Sagung Seto.

Fitri, A.M. 2013. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kejadian Stres Kerja pada Karyawan Bank ( Studi pada Karyawan Bank Bmt). Jurnal Kesehtan Masyarakat. Semarang: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat . UNDIP. Vol 2 (1). Hal 1-10.

Yusnita. 2000. Faktor-faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Keluhan Nyeri Pinggang Bawah pada Pedagang Pasar Terong Kota Makassar Tahun 2000. Makassar: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Hasanuddin.

Matulessy, P.F., & Rachmat, A.R.S. 1997. Gizi Kerja dan Panatalaksanaannya.Jakarta; Yayasan Penerbitan Iklan Dokter Indonesia.

Mangwani J, Giles C, Mullins M, Salih T, Natali C. 2010. Obesity and recovery from lower back pain: a prospective study to investigate the effect of body mass index on recovery from lower back pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. Vol. 92(1): Pp. 23–26.

Ayu, F. 2012. Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kelelahan Kerja pada Operator SPBU Pasti Pas! di Kecamatan Tamalanrea Kota Makassar Tahun 2012. Makassar: Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Hasanuddin.

Widyastoeti, R.D. 2009. Analisa pengaruh aktivitas kerja dan beban angkat terhadap kelelahan musculoskeletal. (Online) http://www. download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=17839&val=1096 Gema Teknik Vol 2.(1), Hal. 28-29 Diakses tanggal 12 Mei 2016.

Tissot, K. Messing & S. Stock. 2005. Standing, Sitting And Associated Working Condition In The Quebec population in 1998 ergonomic, Taylor and Francise, Canada. Vol.48(3).

Suprapta & I Gusti Made Oka. 2009. Sikap dan Beban Kerja Petani Padi di Tabanan Bali. Semarang; Jurnal Seminar Nasional Ergonomi.Vol 9, No.9, Hal 24-30.

Kotowski, S.E. 2007. Understanding The Ergonomic Risk for Musculoskeletal Disorders in The United States Agricultural Sector. (Online) http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17506508 Am J Ind Med July 2007 . Vol. 50 . Pp. 501-511 Diakses tanggal 12 Mei 2016.

Solomon, C. 2002. Accidental Injuries in Agriculture in The UK. (Online) http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/314038/. Occupational Medicine Vol. 52.(8), Pp. 461-466. Diakses tanggal 13 Mei 2016.

Siagian, S.P. 1994. Patologi Birokrasi, Analisis, Identifikasi dan Terapinya. Jakarta. Ghalia Indonesia

Sanjaya, N. 2011. Pengaruh Evektivitas Tata Ruang Kantor Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Biro Umum dan Perlengkapan Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Banten. Banten: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa.

Tjan, H., Lintong, F., & Supit, W. 2013. Efek Bising Mesin Elektronika Terhadap Gangguan Fungsi Pendengaran pada Pekerja di Kecematan Sario Kota Manado, Silawesi Utara. Jurnal e-Biomedik (eBM). V0l.1 (1). Pp 34-39.

Grandjean, E. 1993. Fitting The Task To The Man. 4th edition, London: Taylor & Francis.

Ruliati. L.P. 2006. Hubungan Stres Kerja, Suhu di Ruang Kerja, dan Kadar Hb Terhadap Kelelahan Kerja Pagawai di Instalasi Binatu Rumah Sakit DR. Sardjito Yogyakarta. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.