CLIL for the undergraduate students of engineering in teaching business English

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.8014

Authors

  • Shirley Abisak Iswarya D Research Scholar, Department of English, School of Science, Arts, Media and Management Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
  • Sundarsingh J Former Professor, Department of English School of Science, Arts, Media and Management Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India

Keywords:

CLIL, tertiary level, speaking skills, language acquisition, communicative competency

Abstract

The present study is an experiment on the effectiveness of CLIL methodology for teaching Business English to undergraduate students. The experimental classroom adopted CLIL learning strategy at tertiary level so as to enable the learners to achieve proficiency in both subject knowledge and communication skills simultaneously. The aim is to facilitate the learners’ global carrier opportunities and internationalized higher studies gateways which can be achieved by concentrating on the content specific knowledge and communicative competency. A group of 60 students are taken into consideration and divided into two groups as control group and experimental group. The experimental group students are taught with CLIL methodology and the speaking skill of the learners are assessed after the periodical 5 hours of teaching. The speaking skills of both the groups were assessed based on their language production. It is found that CLIL students showed more interest in learning the subject and had an improved language style, fluency and high deliverance potential along with confidence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bloom, B. S., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (First Edition; L. W. Anderson, B. S. Bloom, & D. R. Krathwohl, Eds.). New York: Longman.

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. In abdn.pure.elsevier.com.https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/content-and-language-integrated-learning

Fitriani, I. (2016). Grass Roots’ Voices on the CLIL Implementation in Tertiary Education. DINAMIKA ILMU, 16(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i2.320

Hurajova, A. (2019). Contribution of CLIL Methodology to the Development of Bilingualism and Bilingual Language Competence of Slovak Secondary-School Students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.905

Klimova, B. F. (2012). CLIL and the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(42), 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.698

Korpela, L. (2013). Learning English Grammar in Content and Language Integrated Learning: Comparing the Grammatical Proficiency of CLIL Students and Students Receiving Mainstream EFL Instruction (Postgraduate Dissertation; pp. 1–96).

Liubiniene, V. (2009). Developing Listening Skills in CLIL. Studies about Languages, 15, 89–93.

Rohrmeier, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). Implicit Learning and Acquisition of Music. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01223.x

Published

28-05-2022

How to Cite

Shirley Abisak Iswarya, D., & Sundarsingh, J. (2022). CLIL for the undergraduate students of engineering in teaching business English. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), 11171–11177. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.8014

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles