Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large, impacted calculi in upper and mid ureter

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8282

Authors

  • Naveed Khan Consultant, Urology, Kidney Hospital, Sonwar, Srinagar, J & K 19000
  • Shabir Ganie Consultant, Urology, Kidney Hospital, Sonwar, Srinagar, J & K 190001
  • Farah Mushtaq Consultant, Anaesthesia, Kidney Hospital, Sonwar, Srinagar, J & K 190001
  • Mohamad Ommid Consultant, Anaesthesia, Kidney Hospital, Sonwar, Srinagar, J & K 190001
  • Muneer Khan Consultant, Urology, Kidney Hospital, Sonwar, Srinagar, J & K 190001

Keywords:

Retroperitoneal, ureterolithotomy, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureterorenoscopy, hydronephrosis

Abstract

Background: Urolithiasis is a common recurrent condition in which the stones are formed within the urinary tract and lead to symptoms when they cause obstruction in the renalpelvicalyceal system, ureters, bladder and the urethra.Most cases of urolithiasis can be managed with non-invasive strategies, however, urolithiasis associated with infections, obstructions, and renal failure may require interventional measures such as ureteroscopy (URS), Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Although open surgeries arealmost obsolete in urological centers, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) is required in the special group of patientsand also as a salvage procedure for failed URS &/or SWL. It is also widely used as a primary procedure for large stones at centers that do not have access to URS and SWL. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and complication rates of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of large, impacted proximal, and mid ureteric calculi. Methodology: Thirty patients who underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy between February 2010 to May 2012 were enrolled in the study.Proximal and mid ureteric stones were removed retroperitoneally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

LopesNeto AC,Korkes F, Silva JL 2nd, Amarante RD, Mattos MH, Tobias-Machado M, Pompeo AC. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy. J Urol. 2012, 187:164-8. 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.054.

Basiri A,Simforoosh N,Ziaee A,Shayaninasab H,Moghaddam SM,Zare S. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2008, 22:2677-80. 10.1089/end.2008.0095.

Lee YH, Tsai JY,Jiaan BP, Wu T, Yu CC. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones. Urology. 2006, 67:480-4. 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.067.

Zhu H, Ye X, Xiao X, Chen X, Zhang Q, Wang H. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study. J Endourol. 2014, 28:100-3. 10.1089/end.2013.0391.

Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Niţă G, Mirciulescu V, Cauni V. Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigidureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol. 2006, 20:179-85. 10.1089/end.2006.20.179.

Goel A,Hemal AK. Upper and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective unrandomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic and open ureterolithotomy. BJU Int. 2001, 88:679-82. 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.00150. x.

Fan T, Xian P, Yang L, Liu Y, Wei Q, Li H. Experience and learning curve of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral calculi. J Endourol. 2009, 23:1867-70. 10.1089/end.2008.0536.

El-Moula MG, Abdallah A, El-AnanyF, Abdelsalam Y, Abolyosr A, Abdelhameed D, Izaki H, Elhaggagy A, Kanayama HO. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: our experience with 74 cases. Int J Urol. 2008, 15:593-7. 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02065. x.

Huri E,Basok EK, Uğurlu O, Gurbuz C, Akgül T, Ozgök Y, Bedir S. Experiences in laparoscopic removal of upper ureteral stones: multicenter analysis of cases, based on the TurkUroLapGroup. J Endourol. 2010, 24:1279-82. 10.1089/end.2009.0536.

Farooq Qadri SJ, Khan N, Khan M. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy--a single centre 10-year experience. Int J Surg. 2011, 9:160-4. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.10.012.

Khan M, Khan F. Innovative technique for ureteral stenting during retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Endourol. 2005, 19:994-6. 10.1089/end.2005.19.994.

Karami H,Javanmard B,Hasanzadeh-HadahA, Mazloomfard MM, Lotfi B, Mohamadi R, Yaghoobi M. Is it necessary to place a Double J catheter after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy? A four-year experience. J Endourol. 2012, 26:1183-6. 10.1089/end.2012.0082.

Mitchinson MJ, Bird DR. Urinary leakage and retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Urol. 1971, 105:56-8. 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61458-7.

Bove P,Micali S,MianoR, Mirabile G, De Stafani S, Botteri E, Giampaolo B, Vespasiani G. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a comparison between the transperitoneal and the retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve. J Endourol. 2009, 23:953-7. 10.1089/end.2008.0055.

El-Feel A,Abouel-Fettouh H, Abdel-Hakim AM. Laparoscopic transperitonealureterolithotomy. J Endourol. 2007, 21:50-4. 10.1089/end.2006.0141.

Published

01-06-2022

How to Cite

Khan, N., Ganie, S., Mushtaq, F., Ommid, M., & Khan, M. (2022). Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large, impacted calculi in upper and mid ureter. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 13078–13086. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8282

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles