Empirical study of consumer behaviour in health insurance sector
Keywords:
health, insurance, dimension, WHO, policy, sectorAbstract
This article devoted to the analysis of consumption of services held under Health Insurance, which pertains to utilization of health services. Health utilization behaviour of the sampled households was observed by obtaining information on different health variables like monthly health expenditure, health risk, health status, types of morbidity and hospitalization. It also encompasses information about choice of treatment and choice of type of health facility -public/private. A comparison of insured and uninsured households was made in the study so as to comprehend the difference in their health utilization behaviour. An earnest effort has been made to examine the level of satisfaction regarding Health Insurance policy among the insured household and also focused on the two major issues of Health Insurance sector related to the presence of information asymmetries viz Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard. Due to better private information about their health status, the insured may have a positive association between health risk and purchase of Health Insurance (Adverse Selection). Besides, the consumers might have a tendency to over utilize the health services because they are available at lower cost due to purchase of Health Insurance (Moral Hazard). Presence of both these problems is empirically tested in this paper.
Downloads
References
Ahlin,T., & Nichter, M., & Pillai, G. (2016). Health insurance in India: what do we know and why is ethnographic research needed, Anthropology & Medicine, 23:1, 102-124, DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2015.1135787.
Amaya, J. L., Ruiz, F., Trujillo, A. J., & Buttorff, C. (2016). Identifying barriers to move to better health coverage: preferences for health insurance benefits among the rural poor population in La Guajira, Colombia. The International journal of health planning and management, 31(1), 126-138.
Bhargava, S., Loewenstein, G., & Sydnor, J. (2018). Do individuals make sensible health insurance decisions? Evidence from a menu with dominated options (No. w 21160). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1991). The role of income and health risk in the choice of health insurance: evidence from Australia. Journal of Public Economics, 45(1), 1-28.
Chithirai, S. & Shanmugapriya (2015). Rural policyholders‘ preference on health insurance, Asian Journal of Management Research, 5(4), 470 -480.
Cutler, D. M., Finkelstein, A., & McGarry, K. (2008). Preference heterogeneity and insurance markets: Explaining a puzzle of insurance. American Economic Review, 98(2), 157-62.
Dasgupta, R., Nandi, S., Kanungo, K., Nundy, M., Murugan, G., &Neog, R. (2013). What the good doctor said: A critical examination of design issues of the RSBY through provider perspectives in Chhattisgarh, India. Social Change, 43(2), 227-243.
Devadasan, N., Criel, B., Van Damme, W., Manoharan, S., Sarma, P. S., & Van der Stuyft, P. (2019). Community health insurance in Gudalur, India, increases access to hospital care. Health policy and planning, 25(2), 145-154.
Dixon, J. (2014). Determinants of Health Insurance Enrolment in Ghana's Upper West Region. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3488 &context=etd.
Dror, D. M., Hossain, S. S., Majumdar, A., Koehlmoos, T. L. P., John, D., & Panda, P. K. (2016). What factors affect voluntary uptake of community-based health insurance schemes in low-and middle-income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(8), https://dx.doi.org/10.1371% 2Fjournal. pone.0160479
Polyakova, M. (2018). Risk selection and heterogeneous preferences in health insurance markets with a public option. Journal of health economics, 49, 153- 168.
Prinja, S., Kaur, M., & Kumar, R. (2012). Universal Health Insurance in India: Ensuring equity, efficiency, and quality. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 37(3), 142–149.
Sheth, K. (2017). The distributional consequences of micro health insurance: can a pro-poor program prove to be regressive? Micro-insurance Innovation Facility, Research Paper, 38, 1-29.
Sundari, M. M., Vidhyapriya, P.,(2016) Changing Face of Indian Health Insurance Industry (With Special Reference with Chief Minister Comprehensive Health Insurance Scheme(CMCHIS)). Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. 6, 310-326. doi : 10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00118.0.
Varghese, T. (2013). Determinants of consumer purchase decisions of health insurance in Kerala. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Cochin University of Science and Tecnology, Kerala.
Wagstaff, A., Lindelow, M., Jun, G., Ling, X., & Juncheng, Q. (2009). Extending health insurance to the rural population: an impact evaluation of China's new cooperative medical scheme. Journal of health economics, 28(1), 1-19.
Yellaiah, J., & Ramakrishna, G. (2018). Socio economic determinant of HI in India: the case of Hyderabad city. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 1(2), 111-119.
Yip, W., & Berman, P. (2019). Targeted health insurance in a low income country and its impact on access and equity in access: Egypt's school health insurance. Health Economics, 10(3), 207-220.
Shetty, G. (2014). Health Insurance Evolution in India: An Opportunity to Expand Access. Cognizant 20-20 insights. Retrieved from http://www.cognizant.ch/ InsightsWhitepapers/Healthcare-Insurance-Evolution-in-India-An- Opportunity-to-Expand-Access.pdf on March 16,2014.
Shahi, A. K., & Dr. Gill, H. (2013). Origin, Growth Pattern and Trends: A Study of Indian Health Insurance Sector. Journal of Humanities And Social Science, 12(3), 01-09.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of health sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.








