Ileostomy closure

Single institute study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8774

Authors

  • Jenit P. Gandhi Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Smt. B.K.Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth deemed to be university (an Institution), Pipariya Vadodara
  • Rakesh Jasani Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Smt. B.K.Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth deemed to be university (an Institution), Pipariya Vadodara
  • Aditya Shah Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, Smt. B.K.Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth deemed to be university (an Institution), Pipariya Vadodara
  • Ohang Chaudhari Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Smt. B.K.Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth deemed to be university (an Institution), Pipariya Vadodara

Keywords:

Ileostomy, institute study, closure, postoperative

Abstract

Introduction: Faecal diversion is an effective procedure to protect bowel anastomosis at high risk for leak. Loop ileostomy is more or less acceptable method for faecal diversion. Some concerns still exist regarding the risk for a significant morbidity and complications associated to ileostomy creation itself and moreover to its closure. Surgical expertise and closure techniques are considered potential factors influencing mortality. Aim of the study is to present a single institutional experience with ileostomy closures, in a high-volume training hospital, where ileostomy reversal is mainly performed by young surgeons. Methods: A retrospective study was done to evaluate data of patients who underwent loop ileostomy and ileostomy closure between June 2017 to June 2021 at Dhiraj Hospital Sumandeep Vidyapeeth , Pipariya , vadodara. Ileostomy closure was always done in hand-sewn fashion, performing either a direct closure (DC) or a resection plus end-to-end anastomosis (EEA). Postoperative morbidity was graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Outcomes after both methods were compared by Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: Hundred and four patients were included. Ileostomy reversal was performed by EEA in 86 patients (82.69%) and by DC in 18 patients (17.30%). Surgery was performed with a peristomal access in 93 cases (89.42%). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shah S, Gandhi JP: Role of ileostomy in enteric perforation. IJSS Journal of Surgery. 2015, 1:10-15. 10.17354/SUR/2015/04

Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ, Heald RJ (1991: Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg. 78:196-198. 10.1002/bjs.1800780221.

Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2012: Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colectomy. Dis Colon rectum. 55:569-575. 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182423c0d.

Biondo S, Parés D, Kreisler E, Ragué JM, Fraccalvieri D, Ruiz AG, Jaurrieta E (2005: Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies. Dis Colon rectum. 48:2272-2280. 10.1007/s10350-005-0159-9.

Shogan BD, Carlisle EM, Alverdy JC, Umanskiy K (2013: Do We really know why colorectal anastomoses leak?. J Gastrointest Surg. 17:1698-1707. 10.1007/s11605-013-2227-0.

Löffler T, Rossion I, Bruckner T, et al.: Strunk R, Henkel K, Bunse J, Jaschke G, Politt D, Heistermann HP, Fuer M, Lange C, Stamm A, Vosschulte A, Holzer R, Partecke LI, Burdzik E, Hug HM, et al. 2012, 256:828-836. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318272df97.

Callin MD, Bălălău C, Papa F, Voiculescu S, Scăunașu RV: Colic anastomotic leakage risk factors. J Med Life. 2013, 6:420-423.

Wong K-S, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio VW (2005: Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon rectum. 48:243-250. 10.1007/s10350-004-0771-0.

Pokorny H, Herkner H, Jakesz R, Herbst F (2005) Mortality and complications after stoma closure. Arch Surg 140: 956-960 discussion 960. 10.1001/archsurg.140.10.956

Mowschenson PM, Critchlow JF, Peppercorn MA (2000: Ileoanal pouch operation: long-term outcome with or without diverting ileostomy. Arch Surg 135: 463-465 discussion 465-6. 10.1001/archsurg.135.4.463

Luglio G, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Cima RR, Nelson H (2011: Loop ileostomy reversal after colon and rectal surgery: a single institutional 5-year experience in 944 patients. Arch Surg. 146:1191-1196. 10.1001/archsurg.2011.234

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 240:205-213. 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, et al.: Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum. 45:1164-1171. 10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9

Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H (2005: Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 92:1137-1142. 10.1002/bjs.5045

Haga Y, Wada Y, Takeuchi H, Ikejiri K, Ikenaga M (2011: Prediction of anastomotic leak and its prognosis in digestive sur- gery. World J Surg. 35:716-722. 10.1007/s00268-010-0922-5

Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J, Friess H (2008: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 248:52-60. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65

Sartelli M, Chichom-Mefire A, Labricciosa FM, et al.: The management of intra-abdominal infections from a global perspective: 2017 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections. World J EmergSurg 12. 29:10.1186/s13017-017-0141-6.

Anandan PK, Hassan MMN, Mathew M: Pre-operative hypoalbuminemia is a major risk factor for anastomotic leak in emergency gastrointestinal resection and anastomosis. Int Surg J. 2017, 4:1405-8. 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171151

Flikier-Zelkowicz B, Codina-Cazador A, Farrés-Coll R, Olivet- Pujol F, Martín-Grillo A, Pujadas-de Palol M (2008: Morbidity and mortality associated with diverting ileostomy closures in rectal cancer surgery. Cirugíaespañola. 84:16-19. 10.1007/s10350-006-0541-2]

Koperna T (2003): Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking. Arch Surg. 138:1334-1338. 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1334

Giannakopoulos GF, Veenhof AAFA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJHJ, Cuesta MA (2009: Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. 11:609-612. 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01690.x

Löffler T, Rossion I, Gooßen K, et al.: Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of random- ized controlled trials. 400:193-205. 10.1007/s00423-014-1265-8

Hasegawa H, Radley S, Morton DG, Keighley MR (2000: Stapled versus sutured closure of loop ileostomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 231:202-204. 10.1097/00000658-200002000-00008

Amin SN, Memon MA, Armitage NC, Scholefield JH (2001: Defunctioning loop ileostomy and stapled side-to-side closure has low morbidity. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 83:246-249.

Suh YJ, Park JW, Kim YS, Park SC, Oh JH (2014: A beneficial effect of purse-string skin closure after ileostomy takedown: a ret- rospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 12:615-620. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.008

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al.: The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 250:187-196. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Gandamayu, I. B. M., Antari, N. W. S., & Strisanti, I. A. S. (2022). The level of community compliance in implementing health protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n2.1897

Suryasa, I.W., Sudipa, I.N., Puspani, I.A.M., Netra, I.M. (2019). Translation procedure of happy emotion of english into indonesian in kṛṣṇa text. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 738–746

Suryasa, W. (2019). Historical Religion Dynamics: Phenomenon in Bali Island. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(6), 1679-1685.

Published

10-06-2022

How to Cite

Gandhi, J. P., Jasani, R. ., Shah, A., & Chaudhari, O. (2022). Ileostomy closure: Single institute study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 11633–11641. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8774

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)