Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Yuseal and Fissurit F Pit and Fissure Sealants in permanent teeth

An in-vitro study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8827

Authors

  • Bhagyashree Bhagwanrao Salunkhe MDS, Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Reader, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Vadgaon Bk., Pune - 411041, Maharashtra, India
  • Prasad Narayan Jathar MDS, Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Reader, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Vadgaon Bk, Pune - 411041, Maharastra, India
  • Subodh Subhash Purohit MDS, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Surgeon, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College & Hospital, Nagpur
  • Devendrapratap Mrityunjay Singh MDS, Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Dental Consultant
  • Aniket Rajaram Desai MDS, Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Lecturer, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sinhgad Dental College and hospital Vadgaon BK, Pune – 411041, Maharashtra, India
  • Pratima Rajendra Mokashi MDS, Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Tutor, Department of Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Sinhgad dental college and hospital Vadgaon BK, Pune- 411041, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

fissurit F, yuseal, microleakage, Pit, fissure sealant

Abstract

Background: Deep pits and fissures may cause food retention and lead to caries. For prevention of this, the fissures are sealed using sealants. For successful outcome, the ability of sealants to seal margins is important. The purpose of this in vitro study, is to compare microleakage of YuSeal and Fissurit F sealants. Aim and Objectives: To compare the microleakage around Yuseal and Fissurit F sealants in permanent teeth. 1) To assess degree of microleakage around Yuseal used as sealant. 2) To assess degree of microleakage around Fissurit F used as sealant. 3) To compare microleakage around Yuseal and Fissurit F used as sealant. Materials & Methods: 30 selected teeth were designated to groups A and B, with each group consisting of 15 samples. Nail lacquer was coated on all the surfaces except occlusal surface and teeth were inserted in acrylic. 37% phosphoric acid was applied on both the groups. Fissurit F and Yuseal was applied to the teeth in (group A) and (group B), respectively. For 24 hours, the teeth were kept in 1 % methylene blue dye at 37°C. Through the sealed fissures, the teeth were sectioned buccolingually. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babu G,Mallikarjun S,Wilson B, Premkumar C. Pit and fissure sealants in Pediatric dentistry. SRM J Res Dent Sci 2014;5:253-7.

Naaman R, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi N. The use of pit and fissure sealants - A literature review. Dent J 2017;5(4):E34.

Sridhar, L. P., Moses, J., Rangeeth, B. N., & Sivakumar, S.Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Sealing Ability of two Commercially Available Pit and Fissure Sealants. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2016;10(9):ZC01–ZC04.

Sridhar L, Moses J, Rangeeth B, Sivakumar S. Comparative Evaluation of the MarginalSealing Ability of two Comercially Available Pit and Fissure Sealants. J ClinDiagn Res. 2016;10(9):ZC01-ZC04.

Salunkhe B, Lele G. Effect of polishing on the microleakage of two different restorative materials in primary teeth: An in vitro study. J Dent Allied Sci 2014;3:2-7.

Rani BK, Viswambharapanicker S, Mattumathody S, Muralidharan A, Dinsha AR, Saluja P. Assessment of Shear Bond Strength and Marginal Sealing Ability of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018;19(6):642-646.

Ovrebö RC and Raadal M. Microleakage in fissures sealed with resin or glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:66-69.

Pardi V, Sinhoreti M, Pereira M, Ambrosano G, Meneghim M. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit and fissure sealants. Braz Dent J 2006;17(1):49-52.

Ganss C, Klimek S, Gleim A. One year clinical evaluation of the retention and quality of two fluoride releasing sealants. Clinical oral investigations. December 1 999;3(4):188-193.

Thomson JL, Main C, Gillespie FC, Stephen KW. The effect of salivary contamination on fissure sealant—enamel bond strength. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. January 1981;8(1):11–18.

Hicks MJ, Silverstone LM. Internal Morphology of Surface Zones from

Acid-etched Caries-like Lesions: A Scanning Electron microscope study.

Journal of Dental Research 1985;64(11):1296-1301.

Simonsen R.J. Pit and fissure sealant: Review of the literature. PediatrDent. 2002;24:393–414.

Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938

Published

12-06-2022

How to Cite

Salunkhe, B. B., Jathar, P. N., Purohit, S. S., Singh, D. M., Desai, A. R., & Mokashi, P. R. (2022). Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Yuseal and Fissurit F Pit and Fissure Sealants in permanent teeth: An in-vitro study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S3), 10727–10733. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.8827

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles