Culture and conduct of fatherhood in India
Are they in synchrony?
Keywords:
fatherhood, India, culture, conductAbstract
The paper aims to add to the scant fatherhood literature in Asia and focuses on the link between culture and conduct of fatherhood in India. The specific objectives of the research are to: (1) explore men’s perception of an ideal father (culture), (2) study men’s participation in parenting (conduct), and (3) examine whether men’s behaviour is in accordance with the beliefs. Using data gathered through semi-structured interviews with 350 fathers of children aged zero to 10 years in Mumbai, India, the results indicate that although the notion of fatherhood is changing, a sizeable proportion of men still see ‘ideal’ fathers in the traditional role of surety, economic provider and/or role model. The actual role performance of fathers is not always consistent with their perception of ideal fatherhood. Identifying the gap between fatherhood ideology and practice and, its correlates may help motivate fathers for increased involvement in day-to-day family work.
Downloads
References
Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cabrera, N.J. (2010). Father involvement and public policies. In M.E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 517-550). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Carpenter, B. (2002). Inside the portrait of a family: The importance of fatherhood. Early Childhood Development and Care, 172, 195–202.
Carstairs, G. Morris (1967). The twice born: A study of a community of high caste Hindus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Coltrane, S. (1995). The future of fatherhood: Social, demographic, and economic influences on men’s family involvements. In W. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood, contemporary theory, research and social policy, (pp.119-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Datta, D. (2007). Overstretched dads. India Today, June 11, 2007.
Fernandes, R. (2010). Fatherhood redefined. The Times of India, June 20, 2010.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro. (2000). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99: India. India, Mumbai: IIPS.
Jahn, A. and Aslam, A. (1995). Fathering and acculturation: Immigrant Indian families with young children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 873–883.
Jain, D., and Banerjee, N. (Eds.) (1985). Tyranny of the household: Investigative essays on women’s work. New Delhi: Shakti Books.
Jeffery, P. (1979). Frogs in a well: Indian women in Purdah. London: Zed Press.
Kakar, S. (1978). The inner world: A psychoanalystical study of childhoodand society in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Kakar, S. (2000). In defense of the inner world. International Journal of Group Tensions, 29 (3-4), 371-378.
Kakar, S. (2010). Father and son: The equation is changing. The Times of India,Februray13, 2010
Kurtz, S. (1992). All the mothers are one: Hindu India and the cultural reshaping of psychoananalysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
LaRossa, R and Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Continuity and change in middle calss fatherhood, 1925-1939: The culture-conduct connection, Journal of Marriage and Family, 55 (2), 455-468.
LaRossa, R. (1988). Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations, 37, 451–457.
Lateef, S. (1990). Muslim women in India – Political and private realities: 1890s-1980s. London: Zed Books Ltd.
Lupton, D., and Barclay, L. (1997). Constructing fatherhood: Discourses and experiences. London: Sage.
McBride, B. A. (1991). Parental support programs and parental stress? An exploratory study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 137-149.
Minturn, L., and Hitchcock, J. T. (1966). The Rajput of Khalapur, India. In Whiting, B.B. (Ed.), Six Cultures: Studies of Child Rearing, (pp. 301-345). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Ogilvie, D.M. (1987). The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 379-385.
Pleck, J. H. (1987). American fathering in historical perspective. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity. (pp. 83-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Raheja, G. G., & Gold, A. G. (1994). Listen to the heron’s words: Reimagining gender and kinship in North India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ramu, G. N. (1987). Indian husbands: Their role perceptions and performance in single and dual- earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 903–915.
Ramu, G. N. (1989). Women, Work and Marriage in Urban India: A Study of Dual and Single Earner Couples. New Delhi: Sage, pp. 206.
Ranson, G. (2001). Men at work: Change or no change in the era of the “new father.” Men and Masculinities, 4: 3-26.
Roland, A. (1988). In search of self in India and Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roland, A. (1991). Sexuality, the Indian extended family, and Hindu culture. Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 19, 595-605.
Roopnarine, J. L and Suppal, P. (2003). Kakar’s psychoanalytic interpretation of Indian Childhood: The need to emphasize the father and multiple caregivers in the socialization equation, in Sharma, D (Ed.) Childhood, Family, and Sociocultural Change in India: Reinterpreting the Inner World, (pp.115-137). Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Roopnarine, J. L., Talukder, E., Jain, D., Joshi, P., and Srivastav, P. (1990). Characteristics of holding, patterns of play, and social behaviours between parents and infants in New Delhi, India. Developmental Psychology, 26, 667–673.
Roopnarine, J. L., Talukder, E., Jain, D., Joshi, P., and Srivastav, P. (1992). Personal well-being, kinship tie, and other-infant interactions in single-wage and dual-wage families in New Delhi, India. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 293–301.
Ross, A. D. (1967). The Hindu family in its urban setting. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Saraff, A. and Srivastava, H. C. (2010). Envisioning fatherhood: Indian fathers’ perceptions of an ideal father. Population Review, 47 (1), 41-55. DOI: 10.1353/prv.0.0002
Saraff, A. and Srivastava, H. C. (2010). Pattern and determinants of paternal involvement in childcare: An empirical investigation in a metropolis of India. Population Research and Policy Review, 29, 249–273.
Saseendran, P. (2000). Factors associated with perceived paternal involvement in childrearing. Sex Roles, 46, 99–111.
Seymour, S. (1975). Child rearing in India: a case study in change and modernization. In T. R. Williams, (Ed.), Socialization and communication in primary groups, (pp.1-58). The Hague: Mouton.
Seymour, S. (1999). Women, Family and Childcare in India: A World in Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shimoni, R., and Baxter, J. (1996). Working with families: Perspectives for early childhood professionals. Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.
Shwalb, D. W., Nakazawa, J., Yamamoto, T., and Hyun, Jung-Hwan (2010). Fathering in Japan, China, and Korea. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The Role of the Father in Child Development, 5th Edition (pp. 341-387). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Sriram, R. and Navalkar, P. (2012). Who is an ideal father? Fathers, mothers and children’s views, Psychology and Developing Societies. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133361202400206
United Nations Population Fund , UNFPA (1997). A new role for men: Partners of women’s empowerment. New York: UNFPA.
Wall, G., and Arnold, S. (2007). How Involved Is Involved Fathering? An Exploration of the Contemporary Culture of Fatherhood. Gender & Society, 21, 508–527.
Weiss, J. 1999. “A drop-in catering job”: Middle class women and fatherhood, 1950-1980. Journal of Family History, 24: 374–90.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of health sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.