Incidence of post-operative pain using three different endodontic preparation instruments

An in vivo study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.9163

Authors

  • Aashish Handa Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Sri Guru Ram das institute of dental sciences and research. Sri Amrtisar
  • Kanwalpreet Kaur Bhullar Professor and head of department, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Sri Guru Ram das institute of dental sciences and research. Sri Amrtisar
  • Garish Bhagat Post- Graduate student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Sri Guru Ram das institute of dental sciences and research. Sri Amrtisar
  • Shantun Malhotra Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Sri Guru Ram das institute of dental sciences and research. Sri Amrtisar
  • Rupam Kaur Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Sri Guru Ram das institute of dental sciences and research. Sri Amrtisar
  • Arshdeep Kaur Post- Graduate student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Sri Guru Ram das institute of dental sciences and research. Sri Amrtisar

Keywords:

post-operative pain, visual analog scale, wave one file, protaper gold file, protaper universal files

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of post-operative pain after cleaning and shaping with three file system using Hand, Rotary and Reciprocating motion in maxillary and mandibular molars. Materials and Method: A total 60 patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: in group 1 (n=20) teeth were prepared with hand protaper file system till F2 size. In group 2 (n=20) teeth were prepared with primary wave one gold and in group 3(n= 20) teeth were prepared with protaper gold file system till F2 size. The pre and post-operative pain score was noted using visual analog scale at 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after preparation. Results: all the pre instrumentation pain values were higher than post-instrumentation. There was significant difference among the groups with highest post-operative incidence in wave one gold followed by hand protaper and protaper gold files after 12 hours. Conclusion: Post- operative pain was significantly lower in patients treated with rotary protaper gold as compared to wave one gold and hand protaper file systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988; 14:346-51.

Singh N. Comparison of hand K-files and NiTi rotary files in Biomechanical Preparation Of Root Canals. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research.2019; 7(1):142-5.

Gautam V, Halwai HK. Comparative Analysis of Efficacy of Mtwo NiTi Rotary Files and Hand K-files. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2017; 1; 5(12):133-6.

Gorduysus M, Nagas E, Torun OY, Gorduysus 0. A comparison of three rotar'1 systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecali from the root canal. Australian Endodontic Journal, 2011; 37 :128-33.

Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2016 1;27(1):37.

Peters OA, Paqué F. Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical use: a review. Quintessence International. 2010;41(6).

Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keleş A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold reciprocating instruments. Journal of endodontics. 2017; 43(8):1360-3.

Krithikadatta J, Sekar V, Sudharsan P, Velumurugan N. Influence of three Ni–Ti cleaning and shaping files on postinstrumentation endodontic pain: A triple-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD.2016; 19(4):311.

Nekoofar MH, Sheykhrezae MS, Meraji N, Jamee A, Shirvani A, Jamee J, Dummer PM. Comparison of the effect of root canal preparation by using WaveOne and ProTaper on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of endodontics.2015; 41(5):575-8.

Jeevanandan G, Ravindran V, Subramanian EM, Kumar AS. Postoperative pain with hand, reciprocating, and rotary instrumentation techniques after root canal preparation in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial .International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 13(1):21.

Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. Journal of endodontics. 2011; 37(4):429-38.

Holdgate A , Asha S, Craig J, Thompson J. Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med (Fremantle):2003; 15:441-6.

Harrison JW, Baumgartner JC, Svec TA. Incidence of pain associated with clinical factors during and after root canal therapy. Part 1. Inter appointment pain. Journal of endodontics.1983; 9(9):384-7.

Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare‐up in single‐and multiple‐visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. International endodontic journal. 2008; 41(2):91-9.

Amudhalakshmi K, Gokulnath M, Ranjani MS, Shakunthala P. Comparative evaluation of post instrumentation pain using Protaper Gold and WaveOne Gold in mandibular molars–a randomized controlled trial. IOSR J Dent Med Sciences. 2019; 18(3):28-33.

Webber J. Shaping canals with confidence: WaveOne GOLD single-file reciprocating system. Roots. 2015; 1(3):34-40.

Saha SG, Gupta RK, Bhardwaj A, Misuriya A, Saha MK, Nirwan AS. Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using a continuous rotary system, a reciprocating system, and a Self-Adjusting File system in single-visit endodontics: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2018; 21(3):333.

Logani A, Shah N. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: An ex vivo comparative study. Indian Journal of Dental Research .2008; 19(3):182.

Kustarci A, Akpinar KE, Er K. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2008; 105: 257- 62.

Burklein S, Schafer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Ended 2012; 38: 850-2.

Tinoco JM, De-Deus G, Tinoco EM, et al. Apical extrusion of bacteria when using reciprocating single-file and rotary multifile instrumentation systems. lntEndod J 2014; 47: 560-6.

Caviedes-Bucheli J, Moreno JO, Carreno CP, et al. The effect of single-file reciprocating systems on substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in human periodontal ligament. Int Endod J 2013; 46 :419- 26.

Nakamura-Craig M, Smith TW. Substance P and peripheral inflammatory hyperalgesia. Pain1989;38:91-8.

Rinartha, K., & Suryasa, W. (2017). Comparative study for better result on query suggestion of article searching with MySQL pattern matching and Jaccard similarity. In 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Rinartha, K., Suryasa, W., & Kartika, L. G. S. (2018). Comparative Analysis of String Similarity on Dynamic Query Suggestions. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) (pp. 399-404). IEEE.

Herman, H., Ardani, I. G. A. I., Aryani, L. N. A., Windiani, I. G. A. T., Adnyana, I. G. N. S., & Setiawati, Y. (2022). Signs and symptoms of depression in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A case report. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 150-153. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1861

Published

17-06-2022

How to Cite

Handa, A., Bhullar, K. K., Bhagat, G., Malhotra, S., Kaur, R., & Kaur, A. (2022). Incidence of post-operative pain using three different endodontic preparation instruments: An in vivo study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 4682–4691. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.9163

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles