Efficacy and safety of dynamic fixation by Tightrope versus static fixation by conventional 3.5 mm cortical screw in patients with acute syndesmosis injuries

Ahmed Maher Aboul Fadl  Elsheikh; Mohamed Samir Gobba; Ahmed Mohamed Khedr; Mohamed Gamal Taher Hegazi; Ahmed Hassan Ibrahim Alsayyad; Mohamed Omar Ahmed Soliman

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.9900

Authors

Ahmed Maher Aboul Fadl Elsheikh
ahmed24maher@gmail.com
Egyptian ministry of health - bolak general hospital
Mohamed Samir Gobba Assistant professor of orthopaedic surgery Cairo University, Egypt
Ahmed Mohamed Khedr Assistant professor of orthopedic surgery Cairo University, Egypt
Mohamed Gamal Taher Hegazi New Mowasat Hospital - Kuwait
Ahmed Hassan Ibrahim Alsayyad Morriston Hospital, swansea bay health board, NHS Wales
Mohamed Omar Ahmed Soliman Professor of orthopedic surgery, Cairo University, Egypt

Keywords:

Ankle fracture, Ankle injury, syndesmosis, tightrope, screw

Abstract

Background: About 18% of all fractures are ankle fractures. Injury of the ankle with syndesmotic ligaments usually causes instability and may require specific intervention beyond the fixation of the fracture. The syndesmotic injuries, that are isolated without displacement, are not treated surgically. But those with concomitant fractures should be treated surgically. Aim of the study: To assess the outcomes of dynamic fixation by tightrope and static fixation by conventional 3.5 mm cortical screw in patients with acute syndesmosis injuries. Patients and methods: this is a clinical trial conducted on 40 patients with acute syndesmosis injuries recruited from January 2018 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of treatment. The first group were treated with a conventional 3.5 mm conventional cortical screw (Group A) and the other group were treated by ORIF using an Arthrex tightrope (group B). Results: The average age of the included patients was 26.8±4.67 in Group A and 28.2±6.3 in Group B. The overall AOFAS score was significantly higher in patients in Group B than patients in Group A after 3 months of follow-up (64.75±10.9 versus 58.5±12.9, respectively) P=0.05 and at 24 weeks follow-up (94.15±5.35 versus 86.95±11.45, respectively) P=0.005.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Waterman BR, Owens BD, Davey S, Zacchilli MA, Belmont PJ. The epidemiology of ankle sprains in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg. 2010;

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006.

Miller AN, Paul O, Boraiah S, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;

Edwards GS, Delee JC. Ankle Diastasis without Fracture. Foot Ankle Int. 1984;

Norkus SA, Floyd RT. The Anatomy and Mechanisms of Syndesmotic Ankle Sprains. J Athl Train. 2001;

Brosky T, Nyland J, Nitz A, Caborn DN. The ankle ligaments: consideration of syndesmotic injury and implications for rehabilitation. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 1995.

Purvis GD. Displaced, unstable ankle fractures. Classification, incidence, and management of a consecutive series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;

Vosseller JT, Karl JW, Greisberg JK. Incidence of syndesmotic injury. Orthopedics. 2014;

Swiontkowski MF. Syndesmotic Instability in Weber B Ankle Fractures: A Clinical Evaluation. Yearb Orthop. 2008;

Tornetta P, Axelrad TW, Sibai TA, Creevy WR. Treatment of the stress positive ligamentous se4 ankle fracture: Incidence of syndesmotic injury and clinical decision making. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;

Patel A, Charles L, Ritchie J. A Complication of Posterior Malleolar Fracture Fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;

Raasch WG, Larkin JJ, Draganich LE. Assessment of the posterior malleolus as a restraint to posterior subluxation of the ankle. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1992;

Williams C, Momenzadeh K, Michalski M, Kwon JY, Nazarian A, Miller CP. Anatomic and Radiographic Safe Zone for Posterior Malleolar Screw Placement. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;

Strenge KB, Idusuyi OB. Technique tip: Percutaneus screw fixation of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;

Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M. Posterior Malleolar Fractures: Changing Concepts and Recent Developments. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 2017.

O’Connor TJ, Mueller B, Ly T V., Jacobson AR, Nelson ER, Cole PA. “A to P” screw versus posterolateral plate for posterior malleolus fixation in trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;

Verhage SM, Leijdesdorff A, Schipper IB, Hoogendoorn JM. Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior malleolus fragment via the posterolateral approach is radiologically superior to ‘A to P’ screw fixation. Foot. 2022;

Bell DP, Wong MK. Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries-should the screw be removed before weight bearing? Injury. 2006;

Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Beriet GC. Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex TightropeTM: A report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;

Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical Rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux, and Lesser Toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;

Malviya A, Makwana N, Laing P. Correlation of the AOFAS Scores with a Generic Health Qualy Score in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2007 Apr 17;28(4):494–8. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3113/FAI.2007.0494

D’souza JJ. American Orthopedic Foot-and-Ankle Society Score, Where Are We Now? – A Narrative Review of Quality of Life Measures in Foot-and-Ankle Surgery. Open Access Maced J Med Sci [Internet]. 2020 Jun 30;8(F):133–6. Available from: https://oamjms.eu/index.php/mjms/article/view/3914

Bava E, Charlton T, Thordarson D. Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;

Franke J, Von Recum J, Suda AJ, Grützner PA, Wendl K. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries. J Bone Jt Surg. 2012;

Davidovitch RI, Weil Y, Karia R, Forman J, Looze C, Liebergall M, et al. Intraoperative syndesmotic reduction: Three-dimensional versus standard fluoroscopic imaging. J Bone Jt Surg. 2013;

Mukhopadhyay S, Metcalfe A, Guha AR, Mohanty K, Hemmadi S, Lyons K, et al. Malreduction of syndesmosis - Are we considering the anatomical variation? Injury. 2011;

Dikos GD, Heisler J, Choplin RH, Weber TG. Normal tibiofibular relationships at the syndesmosis on axial CT imaging. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;

Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW. The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;

Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N. Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: Comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med. 2012;

Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bédard L, Van Den Bekerom MPJ, Glazebrook M, Pelet S. A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(5):216–23.

Egol KA, Pahk B, Walsh M, Tejwani NC, Davidovitch RI, Koval KJ. Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: Effect of syndesmotic stabilization. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2010.

van den Bekerom MPJ, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW, van Dijk CN. Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: Review of current concepts. Injury. 2008;

Seitz WH, Bachner EJ, Abram LJ, Postak P, Polando G, Brooks DB, et al. Repair of the tibiofibular syndesmosis with a flexible implant. J Orthop Trauma. 1991;

Miller RS. Comparison of tricortical screw fixation versus a modified suture construct for fixation of ankle syndesmosis injury: A biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;

Seyhan M, Donmez F, Mahirogullari M, Cakmak S, Mutlu S, Guler O. Comparison of screw fixation with elastic fixation methods in the treatment of syndesmosis injuries in ankle fractures. Injury. 2015;

Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney A-M, Hession P, Masterson E. Suture-Button Syndesmosis Fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;

Kocadal O, Yucel M, Pepe M, Aksahin E, Aktekin CN. Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864