Clinical and radiological comparison of a dynamic implant valve vs a hydraulic maxillary sinus lift augmentation technique with simultaneous implant insertion

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.11198

Authors

  • Abdel Aziz Baiomy Abdullah Baiomy Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assuit, Egypt
  • Amany Khalifa El-Sayed Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine, Modern University for Technology & Information, Cairo, Egypt
  • Abeer Gawish Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sinai University, Sinai, Egypt
  • Shadia A. Elsayed Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University Cairo, Egypt

Keywords:

sinus membrane, bone height, crestal approach, direct implant valve, balloon technique

Abstract

The study aimed to compare between dynamic implant valve (DIVA) and the crestal ballooning techniques in elevating the maxillary sinus membrane (MSM) in conjunction with simultaneous implantation. Patients and methods: 20-patient prospective clinical cohort study. Ages ranged from 42 to 53 years, and had atrophic edentulous maxillae in the posterior region. To determine maxillary sinus status, patients were investigated utilizing intraoral clinical photographs and CBCT series.  Closed Sinus Lifting done and compared between DIVA and ballooning techniques on patients who were randomly separated into two equal groups. The predicted research variables were intraoperative primary stability and level of sinus membrane lift. The main outcome factors were secondary implant Osseointegration stability (ISQ) and the amount of bone height gain. Results: Before surgery, the DIVA and Balloon groups had mean bone heights of 5.8 ± 0.67mm and 6.8 ± 0.86mm , which increased significantly to 12.8± 0.53 and 10.8± 0.67 after 6 months postoperatively. ISQ for DIVA and Balloon groups were 39.0± 2.16 and 40.0±2.16 preoperatively, respectively, and increased to 71.7±1.60 and 70.4±1.27 nine months postoperatively which was significantly higher at 3 months in DIVA group.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelqader Altaweel A, Aziz Baiomy Abdullah Baiomy A, Abdel-Hameed Elsayed S. Effect of Nano-hydroxyapatite and platelet-rich fibrin covered by the amniotic membrane on osseointegration after mandibular piezoelectric ridge splitting. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(1):27-33. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.008

Al-Moraissi EA, Alkhutari AS, Abotaleb B, Altairi NH, Del Fabbro M. Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(1):107-120. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.004

Aprianto, D. R., Parenrengi, M. A., Utomo, B., Fauzi, A. A., & Subagyo, E. A. (2022). Autograft and implant cranioplasty in pediatric patients. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1852

Bernardello F, Massaron E, Spinato S, Zaffe D. Two-stage crestal sinus elevation by sequential drills in less than 4 mm of residual ridge height: A clinical and histologic case report. Implant Dent. 2014;23(4):378-386. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000120

Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38(8):613-616. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/6993637.

El-Prince O, Ragab H. Comparison Between Maxillary Sinus Lifting in Combination With Implant Placement With Versus Without Bone Grafts (Clinical and Radiographic Study). Egypt Dent J. 2020;66(1):113-122. doi:10.21608/edj.2020.77522

Elsayed SA, Alolayan AB, Alahmadi A, Kassim S. Revisited maxillary sinus pneumatization narrative of observation in Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(2):212-218. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.11.002

Guo T, Gulati K, Shen Z, Han P, Fan Z. Therapeutic outcomes of non-grafted and platelet concentrations-grafted transcrestal maxillary sinus elevation (TSFE): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-12. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62407-y

Hazzaa HHA, El-Kilani NS, Elsayed SAE, Abd El Massieh PM. Evaluation of Immediate Implants Augmented with Autogenous Bone/Melatonin Composite Graft in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e637-e642. doi:10.1111/jopr.12631

Heinemann F, Hasan I, Bourauel C MT. Bone stability around dental implants: Treatment related factors. Ann Anato. 2015;199:3-8.

Helal R, Elsayed S, Mohamed F, Saleh H, Khalifa F. Evaluation of the Effect of Bovine Bone Graft on the Preservation of Buccal Plate of Extracted Socket. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls. 2016;3(1):17-22. doi:10.21608/adjg.2016.5065

Jin H-Y, Teng M-H, Wang D, et al. Modified Disk-Up Sinus Reamer for Sinus Floor Elevation and Simultaneous Implant Placement: An Animal Study with Miniature Pigs. J Investig Surg. 2020;33(6):520-529. doi:10.1080/08941939.2018.1545881

Maspero C, Farronato M, Bellincioni F, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus changes in growing subjects: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(4). doi:10.3390/ma13041007

Nahlieli O, Zagury A, Michaeli E, Bruck N, Nahlieli DD, Casap N. Four-years’ experience with dynamic implants with internal port for minimally invasive sinus elevation. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2016;47(8):669-675.

Nandal S, Ghalaut P, Nandal D. Inadequate vertical bone dimension managed by indirect sinus grafting technique and simultaneous implant placement. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2016;7(2):213. doi:10.4103/0975-5950.201355

Peñarrocha-Diago M, Rambla-Ferrer J, Perez V, Pérez-Garrigues H. Benign paroxysmal vertigo secondary to placement of maxillary implants using the alveolar expansion technique with osteotomes: a study of 4 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):129-132. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18416423.

Ritter A, Rozendorn N, Avishai G, Rosenfeld E, Koren I, Soudry E. Preoperative Maxillary Sinus Imaging and the Outcome of Sinus Floor Augmentation and Dental Implants in Asymptomatic Patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;129(3):209-215. doi:10.1177/0003489419883292

Saker M, Ogle O. Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Subsequent to Sinus Lift via Closed Technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1385-1387. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.296

Song DS, Kim CH, Kim BJ, Kim JH. Tenting effect of dental implant on maxillary sinus lift without grafting. J Dent Sci. 2020;15(3):278-285. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.008

Sonoda T, Yamamichi K, Harada T, Yamamichi N. Effect of staged crestal maxillary sinus augmentation: A case series. J Periodontol. 2020;91(2):194-201. doi:10.1002/JPER.18-0632

Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15(2):152, 154-156, 158 passim; quiz 162. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/8055503.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Health and treatment of diabetes mellitus. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n1.2864

Tarun Kumar A, Anand U. Maxillary sinus augmentation. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ. 2015;7(3):81. doi:10.4103/2231-0754.172935

Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: A retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-32

Yassin Alsabbagh A, Alsabbagh MM, Darjazini Nahas B, Rajih S. Comparison of three different methods of internal sinus lifting for elevation heights of 7 mm: an ex vivo study. Int J Implant Dent. 2017;3(1). doi:10.1186/s40729-017-0103-5

Published

31-07-2022

How to Cite

Baiomy, A. A. B. A., El-Sayed, A. K., Gawish, A., & Elsayed, S. A. (2022). Clinical and radiological comparison of a dynamic implant valve vs a hydraulic maxillary sinus lift augmentation technique with simultaneous implant insertion. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 10605–10617. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.11198

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)