Effect of maxillary molar intrusion on surrounding bone density during treatment of anterior open bite

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11461

Authors

  • Maha Mostafa Mohamed Ali Lecturer, Department of Orthodontic, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, AL-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Mohsena Ahmed Abderrazik Lecturer, Department of Orthodontic, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, AL-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
  • Safa Jambi Dental College and Hospital, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammed Khalid A. Badri Dental College and Hospital, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia
  • Shadia A. Elsayed Lecturer, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, AL-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt | Dental College and Hospital, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, Saudi Arabia
  • Amany Mohammed Ibrahim Diab Lecturer, Department of Orthodontic, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, AL-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Keywords:

anterior open bite, intrusion, miniplates, alveolar bone density

Abstract

The aim of the current work is to estimate the impact of posterior maxillary intrusion on the surrounding bone intensity during correction of anterior open bite (AOB). The sample was 14 patients suffering from mild to moderate (3-5mm) anterior open bite with increased posterior maxillary vertical height. This study sample was allocated  into two groups according to the corticotomy the approach. Buccal miniplates and palatal mini screws were used as skeletal anchorage for maxillary molars’ intrusion. The density of the alveolar bone related to right and left maxillary first permanent molars were measured 4.5 months after intrusion commencement. The study revealed that the alveolar bone density of right and left first permanent molars had statistically significant decreases. In the right side, buccal and palatal cortical density had statistically significant decrease, however it was non significant for left both cortical bone. Absolute molar intrusion could be attained by skeletal anchorage miniplates and mini screws in patients with frontal open bite malocclusion. The variation of bone intensity between buccal and palatal sides may account for the variance bone thickness changes after intrusion from the buccal to the palatal sides.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akay. MC. Corticotomy and miniplate anchorage for treating severe anterior open bite: Current clinical applications. A textbook of advanced oral and maxillofacial surgery, InTech publisher 2013, p.714-59.

Akl, H.; Abouelezz, A.; El Sharaby, F.; El-Beialy, A.; AbdEl-Ghafour,. M. Root resorption associated with maxillary buccal segment intrusion using variable force magnitudes. Angle Orthod 2021,91,733- 742.

Akl. HE; Abouelezz. AM; El Sharaby. FA; El-Beialy. AR; El- Ghafour. MA. Force magnitude as a variable in maxillary buccal segment intrusion in adult patients with skeletal open bite. Angle Orthod 2020, 90,507–15.

Baccetti, T.; Franchi, L.; Schul,. SO.; McNamara, JA. Treatment timing for an orthopedic approach to patients with increased vertical dimension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008, 133,58-64.

Beycan. K ; Erverdi N. Anterior open-bite treatment by means of zygomatic miniplates: a case report. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent 2017, 51, 52-6.

Cemile Uysal1, Burcu Baloş Tuncer2* and Cumhur Tuncer2. Maxillary posterior intrusion with corticotomy-assisted approaches with zygomatic anchorage. Progress in Orthod 2019, 20,1-12.

Cozza, P.; Baccetti, T.; Franchi, L.; Mucedero, M. Comparison of 2 early treatment protocols for open-bite malocclusions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthoped. 2007, 132, 743-747.

Defraia. E; Marinelli. A; Baroni. G; Franchi. L; Baccetti. T. Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal open-bite malocclusion with the open-bite bionator: a cephalometric study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2007, 132, 595-8.

Deguchi. T; Kurosaka. H; Oikawa. H; Kuroda. S; TakahashiI; Yamashiro. T. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in adults with skeletal open bite between conventional edgewise treatment and implant-anchored orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011, 139,60-8.

Deguchi. T;Nasu. M; Mukarami. K; Yabuuchi. T; Kamioka. H; Takano-Yamamoto. T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 129, 7-12.

Ding. Wh; Li. W;Chen. F; Zhang. Jf; Lv. Y; Chen. Xy; Lin. Ww; Fu. Z ; Shi. Jj. Comparison of molar intrusion efficiency and bone density by CT in patients with different vertical facial morphology. J of Oral Rehabilitation 2015, 42,355–62.

Firouz, M.; Zernik, J.; Nanda, R. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992, 102,197-205.

G. William Arnetta; Lorenzo Trevisiolb; Elisabetta Grendenec; Richard P. McLaughlind; Antonio D’Agostinob. Combined orthodontic and surgical open bite correction: Principles for success. Part 1.ngle Orthod 2022,92,161-72.

Gandamayu, I. B. M., Antari, N. W. S., & Strisanti, I. A. S. (2022). The level of community compliance in implementing health protocols to prevent the spread of COVID-19. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n2.1897

Giuntini. V; Franchi. L; Baccetti. T; Mucedero. M; Cozza. P. Dentoskeletal changes associated with fixed and removable appliances with a crib in open-bite patients in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008, 133,77-80.

Hart. TR; Cousley. RR; Fishman. LS; Tallents. RH. Dentoskeletal changes following mini-implant molar intrusion in anterior open bite patients. Angle Orthod 2015,85,941–8.

Harta. TR; Cousleyb. RJ; Fishmanc. LS; Tallentsd. RH. Dentoskeletal changes following mini-implant molar intrusion in anterior open bite patients. Angle Orthod 2015, 85,941–8.

Hsu JT, Chang HW, Huang HL, Yu JH, Li YF, Tu MG. Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:511–519.

Jaradat. M; Al Omari. S. Orthodontic Mini Implants, an Update . EC Dent Sci 2021, 20, 107-16.

Johns.G. Orthodontics mini implants. Inter Dent J Student’s Res 2021,9,176–80.

Karthick. D; Shetty; Vivek. P; Soni. Skeletal open bite: a non-surgical approach. A review of different techniques. Scientific J 2007, 1,72-9.

Leung. MT; Lee. TC; Rabie. AB; Wong. RW. Use of Mini-screws and Miniplates in Orthodontics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008, 66,1461-6.

Masella RS, Meister M. Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:458–468.

Ng. J; Major. PW; Flores-Mir. C. True molar intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006, 130,709-14.

Park. HS; Kwon. OW. Nonextraction treatment of an open bite with mini-screw implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006,130,391-402.

Park. JH; Tai. K; Takagi. M. Open-bite treatment using maxillary and mandibular miniplates. J Clin Orthod 2015,398-408.

Posterman. B; Posterman. L; Fisher. R; Gornitsky M. The use of implants for the orthodontic correction of an open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995, 106,245-50.

Ren Y, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maltha JC. Immunohistochemical evaluation of osteoclast recruitment during experimental tooth movement in young andadult rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;50:1032–1039.

Ross, VA.; Isaacson, R.; Germane, N.; Rubenstein, LK. Influence of vertical growth pattern on faciolingual inclination and treatment mechanics. Am J Orthod 1990, 98,422-429.

Saima Nizar Hirji1. Non-Surgical Approach to Correct Skeletal Open-Bite Malocclusion in an Adult Patient Using Third Molar Intrusion Mechanics:A Clinical Case Report. Eur J Gen Dent 2022,11,64–72.

Sherwood. KH; Burch. JG; Thompson. WJ. Closing anterior open bites by intruding molars with titanium miniplate anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002, 122,593-600.

Steele, BP.; Pandis, N.;Darendeliler, M.; Papadopoulouc, A. A comparative assessment of the dentoskeletal effects of clear aligners vs miniplate-supported posterior intrusion with fixed appliances in adult patients with anterior open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021,2021.03.022.

Stuani, MB.; Stuani, AS. Modified Thurow appliance: a clinical alternative for correcting skeletal open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005, 128,118-125.

Tasanapanont. J; Wattanachai. T; Apisariyakul. J; et al. Biochemical and clinical assessments of segmental maxillary posterior tooth intrusion. Int J Dent 2017,2017(2),1–7.

Tian. X; Qian. L; Xin. X; Wei. B; Gong. Y. An analysis of the proximity of maxillary posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2016,42, 371–7.

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Xun. C; Zeng. X; Wang. X. Microscrew anchorage in skeletal anterior open bite treatment. Angle Orthod 2007, 77,47-56.

Published

01-08-2022

How to Cite

Ali, M. M. M., Abderrazik, M. A., Jambi, S., Badri, M. K. A., Elsayed, S. A., & Diab, A. M. I. (2022). Effect of maxillary molar intrusion on surrounding bone density during treatment of anterior open bite. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 4746–4757. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11461

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles