Effect of amniotic membrane versus collagen membrane on sticky bone graft in lateral sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement

Clinical and radiographic study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.11250

Authors

  • Nourhan Mohamed Hassan Department of oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry- Egyptian Russian University
  • Ashraf Abdel Fattah Mahmoud Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Assiut, Al-Azhar University.
  • Hossam El din Mohamed Ali Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Assiut, Al-Azhar University.
  • Abdel Aziz Baiomy Abdullah Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Assiut, Al-Azhar University
  • Mohamed Mahgub El-Ashmawy Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Faculty of Dental Medicine, Boys, Assiut, Al-Azhar University
  • Mohamed Ashraf Abdel Fattah Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Ahram Canadian University

Keywords:

sinus lifting, sticky, implant, collagen membrane, amniotic membrane

Abstract

Objectives: to compare of effect amniotic membrane versus collagen membrane on sticky bone with simultaneous implant placement after lateral sinus lifting procedure. Patients and methods: Seven patients with bilateral sever bone resorption undergone immediate implant after lateral sinus lifting and placement of sticky bone. In G (I): Collagen membrane covered sticky bone and implant while in G (II): Amniotic membrane covered sticky bone and implant. Surgical sites were evaluated clinically for any signs of infection, wound dehiscence, or exposure of implant threads. Also, Implant stability and bone density were obtained at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months. Results: Amniotic group revealed statistically significant value in percentage increase of bone density. Conclusion: The application of sticky bone with amniotic membrane was more likely proved to have the ability to assist and accelerate bone healing and osseointegration.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anker PS, Scherjon SA, Kleijburg-van der Keur C, de GrootSwings GMJS, Claas FHJ, Fibbe WE, Kanhai HHH. Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells of fetal or maternal origin from human placenta. Stem Cells. 2004; 22:1338-45.

Araujo DB, de Jesus Campos E, Oliveira MA, Lima MJ, Martins GB, Araujo RP. Surgical elevation of bilateral maxillary sinus floor with a combination of autogenous bone and lyophilized bovine bone. The Journal of Contemporary and Dental Practice. 2013; 14:445–450

Aryani, L. N. A. ., & Kurniawan, L. S. . (2020). Cost analysis of health for popular depression in Bali. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 3(1), 117-122. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v3n1.182

Azuara-Blanco A, Pillai CT, Dua HS. Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Br J Opthalmol. 1999; 83:399–402.

Calciolari, E.; Ravanetti, F.; Strange, A.; Mardas, N.; Bozec, L.; Cacchioli, A.; Kostomitsopoulos, N.; Donos, N. Degradation Pattern of a Porcine Collagen Membrane in an in Vivo Model of Guided Bone Regeneration. J. Periodontal Res. 2018, 53, 430–439.

EL Moheb Mohamed. “The Use of Growth Factors Fibrin Network to Enhance Architecture, Mechanical and Biological Aspect of the Graft Particles”. Int J Preven & Clin Dent Res 2014;1 : 41-4.

Kumar A, Chandra RV, Reddy AA, Reddy BH, Reddy C, Naveen A. " Evaluation of clinical, anti-inflammatory and anti-infective properties of amniotic membrane used for guided tissue regeneration: a randomized controlled trial". Dent Res J. 2015; 12:127.

Malhotra C, Jain AK. Human amniotic membrane transplantation: Different modalities of its use in ophthalmology. World J Transplant. 2014; 4:111

Mathilde Fénelon, Olivier Chassande, Jérome Kalisky, Florelle Gindraux3, Stéphanie Brun, Reine Bareille,Zoran Ivanovic, JeanChristophe Fricain, Claudine Boiziau . Human amniotic membrane for guided bone regeneration of calvarial defects in mice. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine (2018) 29:78.

Niknejad H, Peirovi H, Jorjani 93–704. M, Ahmadiani A, Ghanavi J, Seifalian Alexander (2008) Properties of the amniotic membrane for potential use in tissue engineering. Eur Cells Mater 15:88–99

Niknejad H, Yazdanpanah G. "Opposing effect of amniotic membrane on angiogenesis originating from amniotic epithelial cells". J Med Hypo Ideas. 2014; 8:39- 41

Ríos LK, Espinoza CV, Alarcón M, Huamaní JO. Bone density of defects treated with lyophilized amniotic membrane versus collagen membrane: a tomographic and histomorfogenic study in rabbit s femur. Journal of Oral Research. 2014;3(3):143-9.

Rodella LF., et al. “Growth factors, CD34 positive cells, and fibrin network analysis in concentrated growth factors fraction”. Microscopy Research and Technique 2011; 74:72-7.

Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(3): 369-378.

Samandari M, Adibi S, Khoshzaban A, Aghazadeh S, Dihimi P, Torbaghan SS, Keshel SH, Shahabi Z. Human amniotic membrane, best healing accelerator, and the choice of bone induction for vestibuloplasty technique (an animal study). Transpalnt Res Risk Manage. 2011;3:1-8

Sohn DS, Heo JU, Kwak DH, Kim DE, Kim JM, Moon JW, Lee JH, Park IS. Bone regeneration in the maxillary sinus using an autologous fibrin-rich block with concentrated growth factors alone. Implant Dent 2011 Oct 1;20(5):389-95

Sohn S, Huang B, Kim J, Park E, Park C. Utilization of Autologous Concentrated Growth Factors (CGF) Enriched Bone Graft Matrix (Sticky Bone) and CGF-Enriched Fibrin Membrane in Implant Dentistry. JIACD,2015;7(10);11-29.

Srouji S, Kizhner T, Ben David D, Riminucci M, Bianco P, Livne E. The Schneiderian membrane contains osteoprogenitor cells: in vivo and in vitro study. Calcif Tissue Int 2009; 84: 138-45

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938

Velez I, Parker WB, Siegel MA, Hernandez M. Cryopreserved amniotic membrane for modulation of periodontal soft tissue healing: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2010 Dec;81(12):1797-804.

Waleed M., Abdel Aziz F., Lydia N. Sticky bone in dehiscence defect around dental implant. ADJ 2018;43 :35-40.

Published

29-07-2022

How to Cite

Hassan, N. M., Mahmoud, A. A. F., Ali, H. E. din M., Abdullah, A. A. B., El-Ashmawy, M. M., & Fattah, M. A. A. (2022). Effect of amniotic membrane versus collagen membrane on sticky bone graft in lateral sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement: Clinical and radiographic study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 10347–10354. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.11250

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)