Load deflection characteristics of copper nickel titanium orthodontic Archwires

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11562

Authors

  • Mathew Thomas Maliael Post-Graduate Student, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai - 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Harish Babu Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai - 600077, Tamil Nadu, India

Keywords:

load deflection, copper nickel, titanium, orthodontic

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and assess the force applied by a broad arch form orthodontic archwire on displaced teeth in ovoid arch form maxillary dentition. Materials and Methods: An in-vitro three-point test was devised to study force applied. An Ovoid form Maxillary pre-treatment model was selected at random. Right Lateral incisor and left second premolar teeth were trimmed out to simulate deflected teeth. Three different brands of wires were evaluated. The wires were divided into four groups.  Each group had 10 wires for testing. The testing was done in both sites. ANOVA test was done to compare the mean force levels. Results: The lowest force level at 0mm deflection was recorded at 1.27gf and the highest force level at 4mm was recorded at 355.88gf. Conclusion:  The forces applied were low and there was no significant difference in the force levels among the groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buehler WJ, Wiley RC. Nickel-base alloys. 3174851, https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/60/57/80/e5941b87509929/US3174851.pdf (1965, accessed 12 July 2021).

BUEHLER, W. J. TiNi-Ductile intermetallic compound. Trans Am Soc Med 1962; 55: 269–276.

Andreasen GF, Hilleman TB. An Evaluation of 55 Cobalt Substituted Nitinol Wire for Use in Orthodontics. The Journal of the American Dental Association 1971; 82: 1373–1375.

Andreasen GF, Morrow RE. Laboratory and clinical analyses of nitinol wire. American Journal of Orthodontics 1978; 73: 142–151.

Kusy RP. A review of contemporary archwires: their properties and characteristics. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 197–207.

Hurst CL, Lynn Hurst C, Duncanson MG, et al. An evaluation of the shape-memory phenomenon of nickel-titanium orthodontic wires. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1990; 98: 72–76.

PROFFIT, W. Mechanical principles in orthodontic force control. Contemporary orthodontics 1986; 228–269.

Nakano H, Satoh K, Norris R, et al. Mechanical properties of several nickel-titanium alloy wires in three-point bending tests. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 390–395.

Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, et al. The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 1–10.

Andreasen G, Heilman H, Krell D. Stiffness changes in thermodynamic Nitinol with increasing temperature. Angle Orthod 1985; 55: 120–126.

Burstone CJ, Qin B, Morton JY. Chinese NiTi wire—A new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 445–452.

Wilkinson PD, Dysart PS, Hood JAA, et al. Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 483–495.

Bartzela TN, Senn C, Wichelhaus A. Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium wires. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 991–998.

Waters NE. Superelastic Nickel-titanium Wires. British Journal of Orthodontics 1992; 19: 319–322.

Sachdeva R. Sure-Smile: technology-driven solution for orthodontics. Tex Dent J 2002; 119: 608–615.

Segner D, Ibe D. Properties of superelastic wires and their relevance to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 395–402.

Liaw Y-C, Su Y-YM, Lai Y-L, et al. Stiffness and frictional resistance of a superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wire with low-stress hysteresis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 578.e12–8.

Iijima M, Ohta M, Brantley WA, et al. Transformation behavior of nickel-titanium orthodontic wires under tensile load. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 398–403.

Tonner RI, Waters NE. The characteristics of super-elastic Ni-Ti wires in three-point bending. Part II: Intra-batch variation. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 421–425.

Meling TR, Odegaard J. The effect of short-term temperature changes on superelastic nickel-titanium archwires activated in orthodontic bending. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 263–273.

Santoro M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Pseudoelasticity and thermoelasticity of nickel-titanium alloys: a clinically oriented review. Part I: Temperature transitional ranges. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 587–593.

Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod 1998; 32: 670–680.

Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, et al. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 647–652.

Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 208–215.

Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, et al. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 248–253.

Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, et al. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 222–233.

Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, et al. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 185–193.

Cattaneo PM, Salih RA, Melsen B. Labio-lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self-ligating brackets. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 691–697.

Badawi HM, Toogood RW, Carey JPR, et al. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 721–728.

Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, et al. Moments generated during simulated rotational correction with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 1030–1034.

Damon D. Damon system: the workbook. Ormco, 2005.

Arai K, Will LA. Subjective classification and objective analysis of the mandibular dental-arch form of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: e315–21.

Fleming PS, Dibiase AT, Lee RT. Arch form and dimensional changes in orthodontics. Prog Orthod 2008; 9: 66–73.

de la Cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, et al. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 518–530.

R, Andrés De la Cruz, Sampson P, Little RM, et al. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 518–530.

Rudge SJ. Dental arch analysis: arch form. A review of the literature. Eur J Orthod 1981; 3: 279–284.

Mateu ME, Benítez-Rogé S, Calabrese D, et al. Prospective clinical study of transverse development with orthodontics with self-ligating brackets. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2020; 33: 112–116.

Mateu ME, Benítez-Rogé S, Iglesias M, et al. Increased interpremolar development with self-ligating orthodontics. A prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2018; 31: 104–109.

Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 395–399.

Gianoni-Capenakas S, Flores-Mir C, Vich ML, et al. Oropharyngeal 3-dimensional changes after maxillary expansion with 2 different orthodontic approaches. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021; 159: 352–359.

Lineberger MB, Franchi L, Cevidanes LHS, et al. Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 609–614.

Copelovici N, Tran M-L, Lefebvre F, et al. Super-elasticity in vitro assessment of CuNiTi wires according to their Austenite finish temperature and the imposed displacement. Angle Orthod 2022; 92: 388–395.

A S, Selvaraj A, Antony PJ, et al. Comparison of load deflection properties and force level of newly introduced M5TM thermal copper NiTi with other orthodontic NiTi wires: an in vitro study. Procedia Computer Science 2018; 133: 248–255.

Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Lena A, et al. Force levels of fiber-reinforced composites and orthodontic stainless steel wires: a 3-point bending test. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 410–413.

Quintão CCA, Cal-Neto JP e., Menezes LM, et al. Force-deflection properties of initial orthodontic archwires. World J Orthod 2009; 10: 29–32.

Mallory DC, English JD, Powers JM, et al. Force-deflection comparison of superelastic nickel-titanium archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 110–112.

Widana, I.K., Sumetri, N.W., Sutapa, I.K., Suryasa, W. (2021). Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(3), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22202

Rahmadeni, A. S. ., Hayat, N. ., Alba, A. D. ., Badri, I. A. ., & Fadhila, F. . (2020). The relationship of family social support with depression levels of elderly in 2019 . International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 3(1), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhms.v3n1.188

Published

05-08-2022

How to Cite

Maliael, M. T., & Babu, H. (2022). Load deflection characteristics of copper nickel titanium orthodontic Archwires. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 4008–4016. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.11562

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles