A clinical study on the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.12099

Authors

  • Akula Swathi Consultant ENT Surgeon, Prasad Multispecialty Hospital, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Akula Satya Preethi Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences, Amalapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Ch. Bhava Teja Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Vishwa Ortho Hospital, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Pandit Vinodh Bandela Associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Meela Ranjith Kumar Tutor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Telangana, India

Keywords:

dacryocystorhinostomy, epiphora, mucopurulent discharge, nasal endoscopy, syringing

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) has advantages like excellent homeostasis, absence of scar, less post operative pain and edema. However, less literature is available on success rate. Aim and objectives: To evaluate the success rate of endoscopic DCR. After 3 months DCR success rate was estimated based on relief perceived by the patient, free flow of saline on syringing through the lower canaliculus and presence of patent stoma visualized on rigid endoscopy. Materials and methods: 25 Epiphora patients underwent anterior rhinoscopy, nasal endoscopy, syringing, CT scan and DCR.  They were evaluated for the relief of symptoms at 2 week and 3 month respectively. Results: Mostly 76% females with mean age (females:54.4/Males:59) were present. Symptoms: watering of eyes (100%), swelling (92%) and mucopurulent discharge (68%). Disease on the right side- 40% and left side -56% only 4% were with bilateral disease. On follow up after 3months 96% patients reported symptomatic relief of complaints and 4% had granulations at the neoostium and synechiae between nasal and lacrimal mucosa which were removed and subsequent relief of symptoms and free flow of saline on syringing were seen. Conclusion:  Endoscopic DCR is a safe, minimally invasive, surgical procedure with 96% functional success rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker, B B. “Dacryocystorhinostomy without flaps.” Ophthalmic surgery vol. 19, 6 (1988): 419-27

Ben Simon, Guy J et al. “External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center.” Ophthalmology vol. 112,8 (2005): 1463-8. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.015

Caldwell, G. W. “Two New Operations for Obstruction of the Nasal Duct.” N Y Med J, vol. 57, 1893, pp. 581–582.

Cokkeser, Y., Evereklioglu, C., & Er, H. (2000). Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 123(4), 488–491. doi:10.1067/mhn.2000.105470

Dressner, S. C., et al. “Outpatient Dacryocystorhinostomy.” Ophthalmic Surg, vol. 22, no. 4, 1991, pp. 222–224.

Emmerich, K. H., et al. “Dacryocystorhinostomia externa. Technique, indications and results.” Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, vol. 91, no. 3, 1994, pp. 395–398.

Erfanian Salim R, Mohammadi S. Results of Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy; Necessity of Teamwork and Patient Selection. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2015 Fall;4(3):114-9. PMID: 27350952; PMCID: PMC4921211.

Halle, M. “Zurintranasalen Operation Am Tranensack.” Arch Laryngol Otol Rhinol, vol. 28, 1914, pp. 256–266.

Hartikainen, J et al. “Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy.” Ophthalmology vol. 105,6 (1998): 1106-13. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96015-8

Jha, K N, and Wvbs Ramalingam. “External Versus Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Retrospective Study.” Medical journal, Armed Forces India vol. 65,1 (2009): 23-5. doi:10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80048-8

Karpishchenko S, Vereshchagina O, Baranskaya S, Karpov A. Rhinological Aspects of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy. Glob J Oto 2018; 14(4): 555895. DOI: 10.19080/GJO.2018.14.555895.

Linberg, J V et al. “Study of intranasal ostium external dacryocystorhinostomy.” Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill.:1960) vol. 100,11 (1982): 1758-62. doi:10.1001/archopht.1982.01030040738005

Maini, S et al. “Endoscopic endonasal laser versus endonasal surgical dacryocystorhinostomy for epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct obstruction: prospective, randomized, controlled trial.” The Journal of laryngology and otology vol. 121,12 (2007): 1170-6. doi:10.1017/S0022215107009024

McDonogh, M, and J H Meiring. “Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy.” The Journal of laryngology and otology vol. 103,6 (1989): 585-7. doi:10.1017/s0022215100109405

Millman, A L et al. “Dacryocystography: the technique and its role in the practice of ophthalmology.” Radiologic clinics of North America vol. 25,4 (1987): 781-6.

Neil Fergie, Nicholas S Jones.Dacryocystorhinostomy. In: Michael Gleeson, et al. (Eds,). Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. (7th edn), Hodder Arnold, Great Britain, UK. 2008. p.1689‒1698.

Rakhmonov, O. M., Shadmanov, A. K., & Juraev, F. M. (2021). Results of endoscopic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with metabolic syndrome. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n1.1811

Rosen, Nachum, et al. “Dacryocystorhinostomy with Silicone Tubes: Evaluation of 253 Cases.” Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers & Imaging Retina, vol. 20, no. 2, 1989, pp. 115–119, doi:10.3928/1542-8877-19890201-10.

Sham, C L, and C A van Hasselt. “Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy.” The Laryngoscope vol. 110,6 (2000): 1045-9. doi:10.1097/00005537-200006000-00029

Stammberger, H. “Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery: Concepts in Treatment of Recurring Rhinosinusitis. Part II.” Surgical Technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, vol. 94, 1986, pp. 147–156.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2022). Post-pandemic health and its sustainability: Educational situation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(1), i-v. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n1.5949

Tarbet, K. J., and P. L. Custer. “External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Surgical Success, Patient Satisfaction and Economic Cost.” Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 7, 1995, pp. 1065–1070.

Tsirbas, A, and P J Wormald. “Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps.” The British journal of ophthalmology vol. 87,1 (2003): 43-7. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.1.43

West, J. M. “A Window Resection of the Nasal Duct in Cases of Stenosis.” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 12, no. Pt 2, 1910, pp. 654–658.

Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S. Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jul;86(7):792-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.7.792. PMID: 12084752; PMCID: PMC1771179.

Published

24-08-2022

How to Cite

Swathi, A., Preethi, A. S., Teja, C. B., Bandela, P. V., & Kumar, M. R. (2022). A clinical study on the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S4), 9856–9865. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.12099

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)