Comparison of laser and cautery in maxillofacial surgical procedures

An original research

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.12725

Authors

  • G. Jeevan Kumar Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
  • Bangaru Mounika Department of periodontology and implantology, Private dental practitioner, Hyderabad
  • Ashank Mishra Assistant Professor, Dept of Periodontics and Implantology, Government Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad
  • Sarin A. Nizar Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Sankara Dental College, Akathumuri, Varkala, Trivandrum, Kerala
  • Fawaz Abdul Hamid Baig Assistant professor. Dept of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, Abha, KSA
  • Damarasingu Rajesh OMFS, PhD Scholar, Dept of OMFS, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat

Keywords:

cautery, clinical trial, diode laser

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the comparison of laser versus cautery usage in various maxillofacial surgical procedures. Methodology: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, 40 individuals were randomly allocated to two groups: group 1 (G1) consisted of 20 individuals assigned to treatment with diode laser and group 2 (G2) consisted of 20 individuals assigned to treatment with electrocautery. The following transoperative parameters were evaluated: bleeding, temperature, and surgical technique parameters (energy deposited on tissue, flow rate, and time of incision). The postoperative parameters evaluated were as follows: pain, functional alterations (chewing, speaking), analgesic medication intake, swelling, healing of the wound area, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among the 40 individuals included in the study, four (two in G1 and two in G2) did not complete the entire follow-up. Therefore, 36 individuals (18 in G1 and 18 in G2) participated. Participants in G1 and in G2 had similar demographic characteristics. No difference regarding the trans- or postoperative parameters evaluated was observed between G1 and G2 (p > 0.05). Also, no difference regarding the time for healing was observed between groups. Conclusion: Diode laser seems to be as effective and safe as electrocautery when applied under similar conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sulewski JG. Historical survey of laser dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44(4):717-52.

Asnaashari M, Mohebi S, Paymanpour P. Pain reduction using low level laser irradiation in single-visit endodontic treatment. J Lasers Med Sci 2011;2(4):139-43.

Asnaashari M, Moeini M. Effectiveness of Lasers in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity. J Lasers Med Sci 2013;4(1):1-7.

Chalya PL, Mchembe MD, Mabula JB, Gilyoma JM. Diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy: A prospective randomized controlled clinical study. East Cent Afr J Surg 2013;18:71 7.

Kumar V, Tewari M, Shukla HS. A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer. Indian J Cancer 2011;48:216-9.

Osman FS. Dental electrosurgery: General precautions. J Can Dent Assoc 1982;48:641.

Vedbhushan ST, Mulla MA, Haroonrasid, Chandrashekhar DM. Surgical incision by high frequency cautery. Indian J Surg 2013;75:440 3.

Babaji P, Singh V, Chawrasia V, Jawale M. Electro surgery in dentistry: Report of cases. J Pediatr Dent 2014;2:20-4.

Romanos G, Nentwig GH (1999) Diode laser (980 nm) in oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures: clinical observations based on clinical applications. J Clin Laser Med Surg 17:193–197.

Hunter JG (1991) Laser or electrocautery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 161:345–349.

Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ (1997) A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116: 379–385.

Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sandoval LF, Feldman SR, Pearce D, Williford PM (2014) Electrosurgery: part I. Basics and principles. J Am Acad Dermatol 70:591.e1–591.14 quiz 605–606.

Rappaport WD, Hunter GC, Allen R, Lick S, Halldorsson A, Chvapil T, Holcomb M, Chvapil M (1990) Effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Am J Surg 160: 618–620.

Mannion AF, Balagué F, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C (2007) Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3:610–618.

Macedo Firoozmand L, Dias Almeida J, Guimarães Cabral LA (2005) Study of denture-induced fibrous hyperplasia cases diagnosed from 1979 to 2001. Quintessence Int 36:825–829.

Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, Minsley G, Guckes A, Haug S, Meredith P, Solie C, Avery D, Deal Chandler N, American College of Prosthodontists (2011) Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Prosthodont 20(Suppl 1):S1–S12.

MacEntee MI (1985) The prevalence of edentulism and diseases related to dentures–a literature review. J Oral Rehabil 12:195–207.

Suter VG, Altermatt HJ, Bornstein MM (2017) A randomized controlled clinical and histopathological trial comparing excisional biopsies of oral fibrous hyperplasias using CO2 and Er:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci 32:573–581.

Amaral MB, de Ávila JM, Abreu MH, Mesquita RA (2015) Diode laser surgery versus scalpel surgery in the treatment of fibrous hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44: 1383–1389.

Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sandoval LF, Feldman SR, Pearce D, Williford PM (2014) Electrosurgery: part I. Basics and principles. J Am Acad Dermatol 70:591.e1–591.14 quiz 605–606.

Suryasa, I. W., Rodríguez-Gámez, M., & Koldoris, T. (2021). Get vaccinated when it is your turn and follow the local guidelines. International Journal of Health Sciences, 5(3), x-xv. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.2938

Resubun, R. M. S., Razak, A., Arifin, A., Indar, I., Malloangi, A., & Thamrin, Y. (2022). The intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on the performance of midwife in community health center. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(2), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6n2.7387

Nur, I. L., Ahmad, M., Syarif, S., & Ahmar, H. (2021). The performance of midwives in managing childbirth using a digital partograph. International Journal of Life Sciences, 5(2), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijls.v5n2.1219

Published

14-09-2022

How to Cite

Kumar, G. J., Mounika, B., Mishra, A., Nizar, S. A., Baig, F. A. H., & Rajesh, D. (2022). Comparison of laser and cautery in maxillofacial surgical procedures: An original research. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S6), 10325–10332. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.12725

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>