Comparative evaluation of microhardness of residual dentin in primary molars following caries removal with chemomechanical agent (BRIX 3000) and polymer burs (ss white)

In vitro study

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.12882

Authors

  • Pranjali Gunjal Postgraduate, Department of Pedodontics & preventive dentistry, Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr.D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri,Pune,Maharasthra, India
  • Rashmi Singh Chauhan Professor, Department of Pedodontics & preventive dentistry, Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr.D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri,Pune,Maharasthra, India
  • Sunnypriyatham Tirupathi Assistant Professor, Department of Pedodontics & preventive dentistry, Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr.D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharasthra, India
  • Vishwas Patil Senior consultant, Pediatric dentistry. Surya mother and child care hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India- 411018
  • Payal Kothari Postgraduate, Department of Pedodontics & preventive dentistry, Dr.D.Y.Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr.D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri,Pune,Maharasthra, India

Keywords:

BRIX 3000, chemomechanical agent, enzymatic gel, minimal invasive dentistry, primary teeth, polymer bur, microhardness

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare microhardness of residual dentin in primary molars following caries removal with chemomechanical agent (BRIX 3000) and polymer burs (SS white). Materials and Method: Extracted maxillary or mandibular primary molars with proximal carious lesion, were selected with active carious cavities extending in to 2/3rd of dentin. The selected teeth were preserved in phosphate buffer saline solution no longer than 30 days. The selected teeth were separated into two experimental groups: group A- chemomechanical method – Brix3000 and Group B- slow speed polymer bur. After caries excavation the microhardness test was carried out on treated dentin using a Knoop indenter. Results: The results suggest a significant difference between among the groups Brix 3000â showed superior results compared to group B (Polymer burs) i.e., The results showed that the microhardness of the remaining dentine after caries excavation with Brix 3000 was found to be greater than the microhardness of the remaining dentine after caries excavation with Polymer bur. Conclusion: In conclusion of the current study, it can be stated that Brix 3000 may be utilized as a successful agent in minimally invasive caries excavation since Polymer burs showed partial removal of carious dentine. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar AS, Kumar RK, Prasad Rao VA, Reddy NV, Reshma VJ. Evaluation of Microhardness of Residual Dentin in Primary Molars Following Caries Removal with Conventional and Chemomechanical Techniques: An In vitro Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S166–72.

Aswathi KK, Rani SP, Athimuthu A, Prasanna P, Patil P, Deepali KJ. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017 Mar;35(1):6–13.

Aydın B, Pamir T, Baltaci A, Orman MN, Turk T. Effect of storage solutions on microhardness of crown enamel and dentin. Eur J Dent. 2015 Jun;9(2):262–6.

bp_behavguide.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.aapd.org/globalassets/media/policies_guidelines/bp_behavguide.pdf

Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: a micro-CT investigation - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21111770/

Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: A comparative in vivo study - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27403059/

Chuenarrom C, Benjakul P, Daosodsai P. Effect of indentation load and time on knoop and vickers microhardness tests for enamel and dentin. Mater Res. 2009;12:473–6.

Clinical Evaluation of Caries Removal in Primary Teeth Using Carie-care and SmartPrep Burs: An In vivo Study Shivasharan PR, Farhin A K, Wakpanjar MM, Shetty A - Indian J Oral Health Res [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 24]. Available from: https://www.ijohr.org/article.asp?issn=2393-8692;year=2016;volume=2;issue=1;spage=27;epage=31;aulast=Shivasharan

Clinical evaluation of polyamide polymer burs for selective carious dentin removal - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 26]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19575051/

Clinical evaluation of polyamide polymer burs for selective carious dentin removal - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 26]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19575051/

Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An in vivo study - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 24].

Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: An in vivo study . [cited 2021 Nov 24]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33384489/

Comparing the Efficacy of Three Minimally Invasive Techniques on Demineralized Dentin in Primary Teeth and Evaluating Its Residual Dentin and Microhardness Levels: An In Vitro Study - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 24].

Corrêa FNP, Rocha R de O, Rodrigues Filho LE, Muench A, Rodrigues CRMD. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31(3):187–92.

Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 24].

Ferraz C, Thé P, Mendonça J, Fernandes CA, Rodrigues L, Yamauti M. Effectiveness of different removal methods of artificially demineralized dentin. Arq Em Odontol. 2014 May 31;50:56–62.

Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin; diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent. 1979;4(2):63–70.

Gutiérrez-Salazar M del P, Reyes-Gasga J. Microhardness and chemical composition of human tooth. Mater Res. 2003 Jun;6:367–73.

Hand RE, Smith ML, Harrison JW. Analysis of the effect of dilution on the necrotic tissue dissolution property of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1978 Feb;4(2):60–4.

Isik EE, Olmez A, Akca G, Sultan N. A microbiological assessment of polymer and conventional carbide burs in caries removal. Pediatr Dent. 2010 Aug;32(4):316–23.

Jain MR, S G. Dentin Comparison in Primary and Permanent Molars under Compound Light Microscopy: A Study. Res J Pharm Technol. 2015 Oct 28;8(10):1369–73.

Jennett E, Motamedi M, Rastegar S, Frederickson C, Arcoria C, Powers JM. Dye-enhanced ablation of enamel by pulsed lasers. J Dent Res. 1994 Dec;73(12):1841–7.

Kitsahawong K, Seminario AL, Pungchanchaikul P, Rattanacharoenthum A, Pitiphat W. Chemomechanical versus drilling methods for caries removal: an in vitro study. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1–8.

Kittur M, Ghivari S, Pujar M. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of two minimally invasive caries removal techniques on fracture resistance of the teeth restored with composite: An SEM study. J Conserv Dent. 2021 Mar 1;24(2):204.

Lohmann J, Schäfer E, Dammaschke T. Histological determination of cariously altered collagen after dentin caries excavation with the polymer bur PolyBur P1 in comparison to a conventional bud bur. Head Face Med. 2019 Jul 15;15(1):19.

Measurement of the microhardness and Young’s modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2021 Nov 27]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8937644/

Meller C, Welk A, Zeligowski T, Splieth C. Comparison of dentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 1985. 2007 Aug;38(7):565–9.

Murali R. Minimal Invasive Techniques in Pedodontics- A Review. J Pharm Sci. 2017;9:3.

Pandey P, Pandey P, Nandkeoliar T, Nandkeoliar T, Tikku AP, Tikku AP, et al. Prevalence of dental caries in the Indian population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 May 1;11(3):256.

Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Vanajassun PP. Effect of two different chemomechanical caries removal agents on dentin microhardness: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent JCD. 2013 Sep;16(5):429–33.

Shakya V, Chandra A, Tikku A, Verma P, Yadav R. A comparative evaluation of dentin caries removal with polymer bur and conventional burs—An in vitro study. Open J Stomatol. 2012 Jan 1;02.

Sheiham A. Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children. Br Dent J. 2006 Nov;201(10):625–6.

Somani R, Chaudhary R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ. Comparative Microbiological Evaluation after Caries Removal by Various Burs. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Dec;12(6):524.

Storage media to preserve dentin and their effects on surface properties Shamim Sultana, BDS,a Toru Nikaido, DDS, PhD,a Md Asafujjoha, BDS,b Junji Tagami, Int Chin J Dent 2006; 6: 123-129 -

Thakur R, Patil SDS, Kush A, Madhu K. SEM Analysis of Residual Dentin Surface in Primary Teeth Using Different Chemomechanical Caries Removal Agents. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(4):289–93.

Thompson V, Craig RG, Curro FA, Green WS, Ship JA. Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review. J Am Dent Assoc 1939. 2008 Jun;139(6):705–12.

Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J. 2000 Feb;50(1):1–12.

Viral PM, Nagarathna C, Shakuntala BS. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;37(3):269–74.

Yildiz E, Sirinkaraarslan E, Yegin Z, Cebe MA, Tosun G. Effect of caries removal techniques on the bond strength of adhesives to caries-affected primary dentin in vitro. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Sep;14(3):209–14.

Published

20-09-2022

How to Cite

Gunjal, P., Chauhan, R. S., Tirupathi, S., Patil, V., & Kothari, P. (2022). Comparative evaluation of microhardness of residual dentin in primary molars following caries removal with chemomechanical agent (BRIX 3000) and polymer burs (ss white): In vitro study. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S8), 3516–3530. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS8.12882

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)