Resection of tumors within and near to the primary Sensory-Motor cortex using Phase reversal Cortical mapping and bipolar stimulation

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS10.13599

Authors

  • Deepak Narendraray Joshi Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Smt B.K Shah Medical Institute and Research centre, Pipariya Vadodara
  • Arpit Joshi Resident, Neurosurgery
  • Mehul I. Solanki Resident, Neurosurgery

Keywords:

gliomas, clinical outcome, intraoperative mapping, neurophysiology, functional balance, extent of resection, morbidity, deficit, oncology

Abstract

Objective Brain mapping techniques allow one to effectively approach tumors involving the primary sensory-motor cortex and nearby area (M1). Tumor resectability and maintenance of patient integrity depend on the ability to successfully identify motor tracts during resection by choosing the most appropriate neurophysiological paradigm for motor mapping. Mapping with a high frequency (HF) stimulation technique has emerged as the most efficient tool to identify motor tracts because of its versatility in different clinical settings. At present, few data are available on the use of HF for removal of tumors predominantly involving M1.  Methods The authors have analysed a series of 6 patients with brain tumors within M1, by reviewing the use of HF as a guide. The neurophysiological protocols adopted during resections were described and correlated with  patients’ clinical and tumor imaging features. Feasibility of mapping, extent of resection, and motor function assessment  were used to evaluate the oncological and functional outcome to be correlated with the selected neurophysiological  parameters used for guiding resection. The study aimed to define the most efficient protocol to guide resection for each  clinical condition. gliomas

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bello L, Riva M, Fava E, Ferpozzi V, Castellano A, Raneri Rossi et al. F, et al: Tailoring neurophysiological strategies with clinical context enhances resection and safety and expands indications in gliomas involving motor pathways. Neuro Oncol 16:1110–1128, 2014

Buckner J, Giannini C, Eckel-Passow J, Lachance D, Parney I, Laack N, et al: Management of diffuse low-grade gliomas in adults—use of molecular diagnostics. Nat Rev Neurol 13:340–351, 2017

De Witt Hamer PC, Robles SG, Zwinderman AH, Duffau H, Berger MS: Impact of intraoperative stimulation brain mapping on glioma surgery outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 30:2559–2565, 2012

Duffau H, Mandonnet E: The “onco-functional balance” in surgery for diffuse low-grade glioma: integrating the extent of resection with quality of life. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155:951–957, 2013

Han SJ, Morshed RA, Troncon I, Jordan KM, Henry RG, Hervey-Jumper SL, et al: Subcortical stimulation mapping of descending motor pathways for perirolandic gliomas: assessment of morbidity and functional outcome in 702 cases. J Neurosurg 131:201–208, 2019

Ius T, Angelini E, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Mandonnet E, Duffau H: Evidence for potentials and limitations of brain plasticity using an atlas of functional resectability of WHO grade II gliomas: towards a “minimal common brain.” Neuroimage 56:992–1000, 2011

Magill ST, Han SJ, Li J, Berger MS: Resection of primary motor cortex tumors: feasibility and surgical outcomes. J Neurosurg 129:961–972, 2018

Noell S, Feigl GC, Naros G, Barking S, Tatagiba M, Ritz R: Experiences in surgery of primary malignant brain tumours in the primary sensori-motor cortex practical recommendations and results of a single institution. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 136:41–50, 2015

Obermueller T, Schaeffner M, Gerhardt J, Meyer B, Ringel F, Krieg SM: Risks of postoperative paresis in motor eloquently and non-eloquently located brain metastases. BMC Cancer 14:21, 2014

Penfield W, Boldrey E: Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389–443, 1937

Rossi et al. M, et al: Intraoperative electrical stimulation in awake craniotomy: methodological aspects of current practice. Neurosurg Focus 28(2):E7, 2010

Rossi M, Sani S, Nibali MC, Fornia L, Bello L, Byrne RW: Mapping in low-grade glioma surgery: low- and high frequency stimulation. Neurosurg Clin N Am 30:55–63, 2019

Sanai N, Berger MS: Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 62:753–764, 264–266, 2008

Schucht P, Seidel K, Beck J, Murek M, Jilch A, Wiest R, et al: Intraoperative monopolar mapping during 5-ALA-guided resections of glioblastomas adjacent to motor eloquent areas: evaluation of resection rates and neurological outcome. Neurosurg Focus 37(6):E16, 2014

Seidel K, Beck J, Stieglitz L, Schucht P, Raabe A: Low threshold monopolar motor mapping for resection of primary motor cortex tumors. Neurosurgery 71 (1 Suppl Operative):104–115, 2012

Smith JS, Chang EF, Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD, Cha S, et al: Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol 26:1338–1345, 2008

Szelényi A, Bello L, Duffau H, Fava E, Feigl GC, Galanda J Neurosurg Volume 133 • September 2020 653 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 08/31/22 04:50 PM UTC

Szelényi A, Senft C, Jardan M, Forster MT, Franz K, Seifert V, et al: Intra-operative subcortical electrical stimulation: a comparison of two methods. Clin Neurophysiol 122:1470– 1475, 2011

van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D, Taphoorn MJB, Jaeckle K, Junck L, et al: Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol 12:583–593, 2011

Published

06-11-2022

How to Cite

Joshi, D. N., Joshi, A., & Solanki, M. I. (2022). Resection of tumors within and near to the primary Sensory-Motor cortex using Phase reversal Cortical mapping and bipolar stimulation. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S10), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS10.13599

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles