Evaluate clinical outcome of residual subgingival cement in prosthetic dentures reliant on dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zahra Nasiri; Mohammad Shokri Vahed; Maryam Rezazadeh Shermeh; Pouria Behzadnejad

doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS10.13747

Authors

Zahra Nasiri Postgraduate Student, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Shokri Vahed
mohammad.shokri_v@yahoo.com
Department of periodontics, School of dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Maryam Rezazadeh Shermeh Dental Student, Naxcivan Dövlet Universiteti (Nakhchivan State University), Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan
Pouria Behzadnejad Post Graduate Student, Dental Students, Research Committee, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Keywords:

residual subgingival cement, probing depths, dental implants

Abstract

Aim: the aim of present study was Evaluate clinical outcome of residual subgingival cement in Prosthetic Dentures Reliant on Dental Implants. Method: Databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO and Embase were searched for systematic literature until March 2022. 95% confidence interval for effect size with fixed effect model and Inverse-variance method were calculated. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata/MP v.16 software (The fastest version of Stata). Result: Bleeding on Probing was observed in 60% of implants with excess cement and the Survival rates of implants was 91% (ES, 91% 95% CI; 75%-100%). Conclusion: present meta-analysis showed that survival rates are 91% and residual subgingival cement can be considered a risk factor for probing depths crestal bone loss and peri-implantitis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Preoteasa E, Florica LI, Obadan F, Imre M, Preoteasa CT. Minimally Invasive Implant Treatment Alternatives for the Edentulous Patient—Fast & Fixed and Implant Overdentures. Current Concepts in Dental Implantology: IntechOpen; 2015.

Shadid R, Sadaqa N. A comparison between screw-and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2012;38(3):298-307.

Nematollahi F, Beyabanaki E, Alikhasi M. Cement selection for cement‐retained implant‐supported prostheses: A literature review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2016;25(7):599-606.

Weber HP, Kim DM, Ng MW, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP. Peri‐implant soft‐tissue health surrounding cement‐and screw‐retained implant restorations: a multi‐center, 3‐year prospective study. Clinical oral implants research. 2006;17(4):375-9.

Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang H-L. Screw-versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts. Implant dentistry. 2010;19(1):8-15.

Wadhwani C, Rapoport D, La Rosa S, Hess T, Kretschmar S. Radiographic detection and characteristic patterns of residual excess cement associated with cement-retained implant restorations: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2012;107(3):151-7.

Kemp BS. Development of a Low Profile, Endoscopic Implant for Long Term Brain Imaging. 2019.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Altman D, Antes G, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine. 2009;7(9):889-96.

Jagathpal AJ, Vally ZI, Sykes LM, du Toit J. Comparison of excess cement around implant crown margins by using 3 extraoral cementation techniques. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021;126(1):95-101.

Hidalgo J, Baghernejad D, Falk A, Larsson C. The influence of two different cements on remaining cement excess in cement-retained implant-supported zirconia crowns. An in vitro study. BDJ open. 2021;7(1):1-6.

Korsch M, Robra BP, Walther W. Predictors of excess cement and tissue response to fixed implant‐supported dentures after cementation. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17:e45-e53.

Korsch M, Robra B-P, Walther W. Cement-associated signs of inflammation: retrospective analysis of the effect of excess cement on peri-implant tissue. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015;28(1).

Korsch M, Obst U, Walther W. Cement‐associated peri‐implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant‐supported restorations using a methacrylate cement. Clinical oral implants research. 2014;25(7):797-802.

Clementini M, Morlupi A, Canullo L, Agrestini C, Barlattani A. Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: a systematic review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2012;41(7):847-52.

Costa FO, Takenaka‐Martinez S, Cota LOM, Ferreira SD, Silva GLM, Costa JE. Peri‐implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5‐year follow‐up. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2012;39(2):173-81.

Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 1999;14(6):865-8.

Shapoff CA, Lahey BJ. Crestal bone loss and the consequences of retained excess cement around dental implants. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2012;33(2):94-6, 8.

Stancari FH, de Araujo MAR, Conti PCR, de Araujo CdRP, Sinjari B, Iezzi G, et al. Bone behavior in relation to the depth of the line of marginal cementation of prostheses on morse cone implants: Radiographic evaluation in a dog model. Implant dentistry. 2015;24(6):720-5.