Dynamic condylar screw functional outcome in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures in adult patients

https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14177

Authors

  • Shams Ur Rehman Assistant professor Orthopedic, MTI Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar.
  • Miqdad Hussain Medical Officer, Orthopedic unit, DHQ Parachinar, KPK.
  • Nisar Ahmed Associate professor Orthopedic, CMH Kharian Medical College (CKMC) Kharian Cantt
  • Fazl Ur Rahman Saeed Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, PNS Shifa Hospital Karachi
  • Imran Ahmed Murad Senior Registrar, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bilawal Medical College LUMHS Jamshoro, Sindh
  • Raza Hassan Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Northwest General Hospital and Research Centre

Keywords:

Dynamic Condylar Screw, Unstable Proximal Femoral Fractures, Functional Outcome, Harris Hip Score, Adult Patients, Fracture Union are a number of the terms utilized in this study

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome of dynamic condylar screw (DCS) fixation in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures in adults. Study Place and Duration: This descriptive study was done from March 2021 to November 2022 at MTI Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar. Methods: A descriptive study, employing dynamic condylar screws to treat proximal femur fractures in all adult patients who met the inclusion criteria, was utilized in this in-depth examination (DCS). The Harris Hip Score was used to determine post-surgery mobility. Results: The average age of patients was 63 having standard deviation of 14. Fracture union took 14.3 +/- 3.8 weeks on the average. At 24 months, the typical HHS was 85.2 +/-12.3, and 78.1% of patients reported adequate or outstanding functional performance. Nonunion, malunion, or hardware failure occurred in 13.3% of patients. Complications were unaffected by age, gender, or fracture type. Conclusion: Dynamic condylar screw therapy has demonstrated promising functional and radiological benefits with few adverse effects in people with unstable proximal femoral fractures. DCS fixation, an efficient treatment for such fractures, is one of the best treatment for such fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996;18(1 Suppl):57S-63S.

Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726-33.

Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9):CD000093.

Anglen JO, Weinstein JN. Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice: a review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(4):700-7.

Goffin JM, Pankaj P, Simpson AH. The importance of lag screw position for the stabilization of trochanteric fractures with a sliding hip screw: a subject-specific finite element study. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(4):596-600.

Wu D, Ren G, Peng C, et al. Comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic condylar screw in treating unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):228.

Huang X, Leung F, Liu M, et al. Dynamic condylar screw and locking compression plate in the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36(8):1697-701.

Jain P, Maini L, Mishra P, et al. Evaluation of proximal femoral locking compression plate in unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2014;5(4):203-9.

Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737-55.

Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75(5):797-8.

Kulkarni SG, Babhulkar SS, Kulkarni SM, et al. Dynamic condylar screw for intertrochanteric fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2005;39(4):234-7.

Chen L, Zhang G, Song D, et al. The use of dynamic condylar screws and locking compression plates in the treatment of elderly patients with complex femoral fractures. Exp Ther Med. 2015;10(5):1971-6.

Yu W, Zhang X, Zhu X, et al. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of PFNA, PFLCP, and DHS in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018;52(3):201-6.

Maini L, Jain P, Mishra P, et al. Evaluation of dynamic condylar screw system in distal femoral fractures. Injury. 2005;36(10):1222-7.

Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, et al. Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures: randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(1):86-94.

Zou J, Xu Y, Yang H. A comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw devices in trochanteric fractures. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(4):1057-64.

Published

21-04-2023

How to Cite

Ur Rehman, S., Hussain, M., Ahmed, N., Saeed, F. U. R., Murad, I. A., & Hassan, R. (2023). Dynamic condylar screw functional outcome in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures in adult patients. International Journal of Health Sciences, 7(S1), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14177

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)