Functional outcome of Latarjet for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation
Keywords:
anterior shoulder dislocation recurrence, open latar jet technique, functional outcomesAbstract
Background and Aim: Recurrent shoulder dislocations can be treated with a variety of surgical procedures. However, soft-tissue repair appears to be ineffective in all cases of recurrent shoulder dislocation. The present study aimed to determine the Latar jet technique functional outcome for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Patients and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 42 recurrent shoulder dislocation patients at the MTI Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar from January 2019 to December 2022. All the eligible patients were operated with open Latar jet procedure. Constant-Murley shoulder score was used for the assessment of functional outcome at 6th months. SPSS version 27 was used for data analysis. Results: Of the total 42 patients, there were 40 (95.2%) male and 2 (4.8%) female. The overall mean age was 46.8±8.4 years. The right and left-side involvement was found in 32 (76.2%) and 12 (23.8%) respectively. The incidence of poor, fair, good, and very good outcomes was 3 (7.1%), 4 (9.5%), 12 (28.6%), and 23 (54.8%) respectively. There was significant improvement in shoulder motion and reduction in pain after 6th month's follow-up.
Downloads
References
Ahmad E, Basit MM. Outcome of MA, Shakeel M, Hamid Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior MS, Jalal SF, Hanif Shoulder. J Pak Orthop Assoc 2021;33(2).
An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, Trantalis J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2016; 25(5):853-63.
Bessière C, Trojani C, Carles M, Mehta SS, Boileau P. The open Latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic Bankart repair. Clinical Ortho paedics and Related Research®. 2014;472(8):2345-51.
Bohu Y, Abadie P, van Rooij F, Nover L, Berhouet J, Hardy A. Latarjet procedure enables 73% to return to play within 8 months depending on preoperative SIRSI and Rowe scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06475-1.
Chillemi C, Guerrisi M, Paglialunga C, Salate Santone F, Osimani M. Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: A 24-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021;141(2):189-196.
Cunningham G, Benchouk S, Kherad O, Ladermann A.Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:540-545.
Dupley L, Funk L. The Latarjet Procedure: Effective and Safe. The Open Orthopaedics Journal 2019;13:272-275.
Ernstbrunner L, Plachel F, Heuberer P, Pauzenberger L, Moroder P, Resch H, et al. Arthroscopic versus open iliac crest bone grafting in recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: A computed tomography-based quantitative assessment. Arthroscopy 2018;34(2):352-359.
Ernstbrunner L, Wartmann L, Zimmermann SM, Schenk P, Gerber C, Wieser K. Long-term Results of the Open Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Older Than 40 Years. Am J Sports Med 2019 ;47(13):3057-3064.
Ersen A, Birisik F, Ozben H, Atalar AC, Sahinkaya T, Seyahi A, et al. Latarjet procedure using subscapularis split approach offers better rotational endurance than partial tenotomy for anterior shoulder instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26(1):88-93.
Hurley ET, Jamal MS, Ali ZS, Montgomery C, Pauzenberger L, Mullett H. Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019;28(2):33-39.
Hurley ET, Jamal MS, Ali ZS, Montgomery C, Pauzenberger L, Mullett H et al. Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2018.
Hurley ET, Manjunath AK, Matache BA, Jia NW, Virk M, Jazrawi LM, et al. No difference in 90-day complication rate following open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06301-0.
Levy DM, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. History of surgical intervention of anterior shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25(6):139-150.
Randelli P, Fossati C, Stoppani C, Evola FR, De Girolamo L. Open Latarjet versus arthroscopic Latarjet: clinical results and cost analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24:526-532.
Rao AJ, Verma NN, Trenhaile SW. The “Floating Labrum”: bankart lesion repair with anterior capsular extension using 2 anterior working portals. Arthrosc Tech 2017; 6(5):1607-1611.
Rollick NC, Ono Y, Kurji HM, Nelson AA, Boorman RS, Thornton GM, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Bankart and Latarjet repairs: A systematic review. Open Access J Sports Med 2017:8:97-105.
Rollick NC, Ono Y, Kurji HM, Nelson AA, Boorman RS, Thornton GM, Lo IK. Long-term outcomes of the Bankart and Latarjet repairs: A systematic review. Open access journal of sports medicine. 2017; 8:97.
Shah AA, Butler RB, Romanowski J, Goel D, Karadagli D, Warner JJ. Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure. JBJS. 2012; 94(6):495-501.
Unger RZ, Burnham JM, Gammon L, Malempati CS, Jacobs CA, Makhni EC et al. The responsiveness of patient-reported outcome tools in shoulder surgery is dependent on the underlying pathological condition. The American journal of sports medicine. 2019; 47(1):241-7.
Young AA, Baba M, Neyton L, Godeneche A, Walch G. Coracoid graft dimensions after harvesting for the open Latarjet procedure. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22(4):485-488.
Zhu YM, Jiang CY, Lu Y, Li FL, Wu G. Coracoid bone graft resorption after Latarjet procedure is underestimated: A new classification system and a clinical review with computed tomography evaluation. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2015;24(11):1782-8.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of health sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.








