Compare the stability of sagittal skeletal and overjet anteroposterior correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in orthognathic procedures

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Seyedeh Maryam Mousavi Resident of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Shadi Poursoltani DDS (doctor of dental surgery), Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
  • Sheila Shahsavaripour Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz Iran
  • Mohammad Harati Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Keywords:

class III malocclusion, orthognathic, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy

Abstract

Background and aim: The purpose of this study was Compare the Stability of Sagittal Skeletal and Overjet Anteroposterior Correction of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion in Orthognathic Procedures.Method: Databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, ISI Web of knowledge and Embase were searched for systematic literature between 2011 to 30 November 2022. Data analysis was performed using STATA/MP V17 software. 95% confidence interval for mean difference with fixed effect model and Inverse-variance method were calculated. Result: In the initial review, duplicate studies were eliminated and abstracts of 303 studies were reviewed, the full text of 54 studies was reviewed by two authors, finally, five studies were selected. Mean differences of relapse in the ANB angle, A-point to horizontal and overjet was -0.15 (MD, -0.15 95% CI -0.78, 0.47; p=0.64), -0.17 (MD, -0.17 95% CI -0.42, 0.08; p=0.19) and 0.22 (MD, 0.22 95% CI -0.26, 0.70; p=0.37), respectively. Conclusion: Based on the current meta-analysis, both the single-jaw surgery and the two-jaw surgery in anterior-posterior skeletal stability and overjet were similar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jaradat M. An overview of Class III malocclusion (prevalence, etiology and management). development. 2018;7:8.

Dehesa-Santos A, Iber-Diaz P, Iglesias-Linares A. Genetic factors contributing to skeletal class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021;25(4):1587-612.

Watanabe M, Suda N, Ohyama K. Mandibular prognathism in Japanese families ascertained through orthognathically treated patients. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2005;128(4):466-70.

Proffit WR, Fields Jr H, Moray L. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1998;13(2):97-106.

Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, et al. Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial. Journal of orthodontics. 2016;43(3):164-75.

Khan R, Horrocks E. A study of adult orthodontic patients and their treatment. British journal of orthodontics. 1991;18(3):183-94.

Lee R, Hwang S, Lim H, Cha J-Y, Kim K-H, Chung CJ. Treatment satisfaction and its influencing factors among adult orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;153(6):808-17.

Arnett GW, Trevisiol L, Grendene E, McLaughlin RP, D'Agostino A. Combined orthodontic and surgical open bite correction: Principles for success. Part 1. The Angle Orthodontist. 2022;92(2):161-72.

Tugwell P, Tovey D. PRISMA 2020. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;134:A5-A6.

Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. European journal of epidemiology. 2010;25(9):603-5.

Higgins J, Altman D, Gøtzsche P, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman A, et al. Cochrane bias methods group; cochrane statistical methods group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials BMJ. 2011;343(7829):d5928.

Ooi K, Inoue N, Matsushita K, Yamaguchi H-o, Mikoya T, Kawashiri S, et al. Comparison of postoperative stability between BSSRO and Le Fort 1 Osteotomy with BSSRO in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with severe open bite. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2020;19(4):591-5.

Han JJ, Jung S, Park H-J, Oh H-K, Kook M-S. Evaluation of postoperative mandibular positional changes after mandibular setback surgery in a surgery-first approach: isolated mandibular surgery versus bimaxillary surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;77(1):181. e1-. e12.

Larson BE, Lee N-K, Jang M-J, Yun P-Y, Kim J-W, Kim Y-K. Comparing stability of mandibular setback versus 2-jaw surgery in Class III patients with minimal presurgical orthodontics. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017;75(6):1240-8.

Al-Delayme R, Al-Khen M, Hamdoon Z, Jerjes W. Skeletal and dental relapses after skeletal class III deformity correction surgery: single-jaw versus double-jaw procedures. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2013;115(4):466-72.

Proffit WR, Phillips C, Turvey TA. Stability after mandibular setback: mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2012;70(7):e408-e14.

Kobayashi T, Watanabe I, Ueda K, Nakajima T. Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1986;44(9):698-702.

Published

08-06-2023

How to Cite

Mousavi, S. M., Poursoltani, S., Shahsavaripour, S., & Harati, M. (2023). Compare the stability of sagittal skeletal and overjet anteroposterior correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in orthognathic procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Health Sciences, 7(S1), 1249–1258. Retrieved from https://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijhs/article/view/14339

Issue

Vol. 7 No. S1 (2023)

Section

Peer Review Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of health sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.

Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.

Most read articles by the same author(s)