Exploring the role of pharmacology in surgical anatomy and patient outcomes
Keywords:
pharmacology, surgical anatomy, patient outcomes, propofol, sevoflurane, multimodal analgesiaAbstract
Introduction: This study looked at how pharmacology affected surgical anatomy and patient outcomes. Methods: The research included a total of 162 participants who were having elective surgery. Propofol or sevoflurane was randomly allocated to patients for the initiation and maintenance of anesthesia. Acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs), and opioids were used in combination to alleviate pain. Results: When compared to patients receiving sevoflurane, those receiving propofol had substantially reduced rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (p 0.05). Additionally, the propofol group saw quicker healing and shorter hospital stays (p 0.05). Multimodal analgesia was linked to better pain management and reduced opioid use. Conclusion: The use of propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance, as well as multimodal analgesia, may provide superior outcomes for patients undergoing surgery. These findings highlight the importance of pharmacology in surgical anatomy and patient outcomes and emphasize the need for further research to optimize the use of these interventions in the perioperative period.
Downloads
References
Chou, R., Gordon, D. B., de Leon-Casasola, O. A., Rosenberg, J. M., Bickler, S., Brennan, T., ... & Wu, C. L. (2016). Management of Postoperative Pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American pain society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' committee on regional anesthesia, executive committee, and administrative council. The journal of pain, 17(2), 131-157.
Flin, R., & Maran, N. (2015). Basic concepts for crew resource management and non-technical skills. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 29(1), 27-39.
Gan, T. J., Diemunsch, P., Habib, A. S., Kovac, A., Kranke, P., Meyer, T. A., ... & Tramèr, M. R. (2014). Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 118(1), 85-113.
Giovannitti, J. A., Rosenberg, M. B., & Phero, J. C. (2013). Pharmacology of local anesthetics used in oral surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, 25(3), 453-465.
Kacmar, R. M. (2017). Safety interventions on the labor and delivery unit. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 30(3), 287-293.
Kearns, R., Macfarlane, A., Grant, A., Puxty, K., Harrison, P., Shaw, M., ... & Kinsella, J. (2016). A randomised, controlled, double blind, non‐inferiority trial of ultrasound‐guided fascia iliaca block vs. spinal morphine for analgesia after primary hip arthroplasty. Anaesthesia, 71(12), 1431-1440.
Lax, M., Pesonen, E., Hiippala, S., Schramko, A., Lassila, R., & Raivio, P. (2020). Heparin dose and point-of-care measurements of hemostasis in cardiac surgery—results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 34(9), 2362-2368.
Nishtala, P. S., Salahudeen, M. S., & Hilmer, S. N. (2016). Anticholinergics: theoretical and clinical overview. Expert opinion on drug safety, 15(6), 753-768.
Plackett, T. P., Ton-That, H. H., Mueller, J., Grimley, K. M., Kovacs, E. J., & Esposito, T. J. (2015). Screening for at-risk drinking behavior in trauma patients. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 115(6), 376-382.
Roger, C., & Beloucif, S. (2016). Communication with patient's families in the intensive care unit: Do we really meet their needs?. Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine, 35(3), 179-181.
Silva, M., & Halpern, S. H. (2010). Epidural analgesia for labor: Current techniques. Local and regional anesthesia, 143-153.
White, P. F., Kehlet, H., Neal, J. M., Schricker, T., Carr, D. B., Carli, F., & Fast-Track Surgery Study Group. (2007). The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 104(6), 1380-1396.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of health sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJHS volumes 4 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.